OrionTheWolf
Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Crush quote:
ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf Depends on the wording of the bill. As far as I knew, when a firearm is purchased the Feds already get a copy of the purchaser information. *snip* Actually the Tiahrt Amendment keeps that from happening already. Gun dealers keep that info locally. That's why the Tiahrt Amendment is so important....keeps firearms registration from happening. Which in turn, as has been already pointed out, leads to confiscation. It just makes the data in the database from being used as evidence alone. The information is still released, when the appropriate request is filed, to assist in criminal investigations. Also, my point is that the Feds already get this information and have it in the Firearms Trace System database. quote:
The number of crimes relative to the number of guns in the average law abiding citizen's possession is minuscule. (See US Bureau of Justice stats ) around 500k nonfatal "gun involved crimes" and 10k "fatal handgun" crimes compared to an estimated 250,000k guns in the US. If we just said that each gun crime was a different gun (not valid, but for discussion purposes) then only 0.2% of guns are involved in gun crime. So most likely, less than 1/10 of 1 percent of all guns in the US. (yes, includes rifles, etc. ) So, register over 99.98% of the guns when only less than 0.02% are involved in crime? --------------- It is great to be a Floridian...Welcome to the Gunshine State! I agree completely with this. This is really just going to turn into one of those irrational progun vs. anti-gun debates though. BTW, thanks for the links.
_____________________________
When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."
|