Vendaval
Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005 Status: offline
|
Fast Reply - First a couple of points, my experience and perspective of unions echos what has been stated in some of the threads started by Mz. Mia on this subject. Some of the unions are overall positive in their contributions to their workers and business and the local economy, others are more negative than positive. And of course there are major differences depending on the location, city & county politics and the type of profession represented. A common problem in California is that many contractors are not only non-union but also non-licessed and hire workers without checking their legal status and pay below-market wages without reporting them for taxes and neglect safety training and codes. The results are predictable in terms of poor quality, rapid failure of the structures, injuries, deaths and additional costs for repairs and law suits. I did some basic checking on differences in safety ratings for union vs non-union construction and these are some of the findings - "Plasterers Local 200 "Effective Safety Training Worksite injuries are a major concern for workers, property owners and contractors alike. Union workers respond to those concerns by learning proper work habits and a thorough understanding of OSHA safety regulations on the work site. The Plasterers’ Union Local 200 is unparalleled in its commitment to ongoing safety programs. These efforts serve to substantially reduce accidents, employer liability, and valuable time lost on work projects. Our Record Speaks for Itself A study released in Cockshaw’s Construction Labor News & Opinion (April 2003) revealed that non-union contractors were 360% more unsafe than union contractors. Comparing a 42-month period from 1998 to 2001, OSHA statistics showed 758 OSHA violations in the non-union sector versus 162 violations in the union sector. These types of results are a direct result of the diligence of union safety training." http://www.plastererslocal200.org/ This next report is specific to South Florida, page 68 in the pdf. IMMIGRANT CONSTRUCTION WORKERS AND SAFETY AND HEALTH IN SOUTH FLORIDA, A Research Report Bruce Nissen, Research Institute on Social and Economic Policy (RISEP), Center for Labor Research and Studies, Florida International University, June 2007 "Finally, a look at the serious injury rates of these workers again indicated that unionization greatly improves their safety, while documented legal status does not. The results are consistent that unionization improves safety. (While an association is not proof of a causal relationship, in this instance imputation of causality is probably justified, because while it is intuitively implausible or impossible for something like training or personal work habits or employer safety practices to cause, or lead to, unionization, the reverse is not at all implausible.) A third hypothesis was that the unskilled (general laborers) would receive inferior safety outcomes compared to those either semi-skilled or skilled. Results generally support this hypothesis, although not for use of personal protective equipment and only weakly regarding employer practices. Finally, a fourth hypothesis was that inferior working conditions in other areas (lack of health insurance, lack of a pension plan, being paid in cash, etc.) would be associated with inferior safety outcomes. The results strongly support this "bad employer" hypothesis that inferior treatment is clustered in particular employers across safety and non-safety lines. It appears that a very strong variable leading to safer or less safe conditions for these workers is an employer who "cuts corners" in the pursuit of profit compared to one who does not." http://www.risep-fiu.org/reports/Immigrant_Construction_Workers_and_S_%20H.pdf
_____________________________
"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light. So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that great day, I will tease you all the same." "WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE http://KinkMeet.co.uk
|