Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 1:18:25 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
I responded to your statements in post #47 about laws being in place to protect people now.  The laws along the border to protect workers are not well enforced and the abuses have been documented.

(edited to add a sentence)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
Where did I ever say NAFTA was a good idea?


< Message edited by Vendaval -- 2/11/2009 1:31:14 PM >


_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 1:23:52 PM   
Coldwarrior57


Posts: 297
Joined: 12/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cjan

quote:

ORIGINAL: Steponme73

Union labor drives up the price of construction.  I build and use only non-union.  Skilled people who make a good living, but not raping the consumer.


Nonsense. I know a number of contractors here in Florida who employ illegal ( mostly Mexican ) workers and pay them shit. They DO NOT pass on thier savings costs to consumers. They stuff their own pockets with the difference. Also, having lived in the Midwest for many years where construction labor is mostly union, I deplore the pittance that skilled labor   such as carpenters ) are paid in the non-union south. The cost of the finished product to the home buyer in the south is , almost always, much higher than the same house would cost in the unionized labor north.
Myth: Union-only PLA's reduce construction costs.
 Fact: Union-only requirements limit bidders, force
construction users to pay inflated union wages and
follow outmoded and inefficient union work rules. The
bottom line: Union-only PLA's unnecessarily drive up
costs on projects.

http://www.plawatch.com/mythvsfact.htm

_____________________________

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell

(in reply to cjan)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 1:29:37 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
Wrong.  Accidents like these were primary reasons unions started in the first place and unions provide education and safety training to their members.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Unions don't write or enforce fire code, and neither do they write or enforce OSHA regulations. Neither of the industrial accidents you described had anything to do with Unions or the lack thereof.


_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 2:57:24 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
Just a few of the U.S. industrial accidents from the last 100 years as example are listed here: the Texas City Disaster from 1947 in Texas; Three Mile Island in Penn. 1979; and the Sago Mine Disaster, West Virginia, 2006.
 
 
The Sago Mine disaster was a coal mine explosion on January 2, 2006, in the Sago Mine in Sago, West Virginia, USA near the Upshur County seat of Buckhannon. The blast and ensuing aftermath trapped 13 miners for nearly two days, Only one of them, Randal McCloy, survived. It was the worst mining disaster in the US since the Jim Walter Resources Mine Disaster in Alabama on September 23, 2001 [1] [2] killed 13 people, and the worst disaster in West Virginia since a 1968 incident that killed 78 people.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sago_Mine_Disaster
 
The Three Mile Island accident of 1979 was a partial core meltdown in Unit 2 (a pressurized water reactor manufactured by Babcock & Wilcox) of the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania near Harrisburg. It was the most significant accident in the history of the American commercial nuclear power generating industry, resulting in the release of an estimated 43,000 curies (1.59 PBq) of radioactive krypton,[1] but under 20 curies (740 GBq) of the particularly hazardous iodine-131.[2]
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Mile_Island_accident


"The Texas City Disaster of April 16, 1947, started with the mid-morning fire and detonation of approximately 2,300 tons[1] of ammonium nitrate on board the French-registered vessel SS Grandcamp in the port at Texas City, Texas, killing at least 567 people. It also triggered the first ever class action lawsuit against the United States government, under the then-recently enacted Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), on behalf of 8,485 victims."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_City_Disaster


quote:

ORIGINAL: Coldwarrior57

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Come now Vendaval,we all know a tragedy such as the Triangle Shirtwaist  Factory could never ever be repeated today.
Responsible business men can be counted on to make responsible decisions....allways keeping the welfare of the worker front and center.
Triangle Fire disaster of 1911. Please . 98 years ago, wow thats a stretch.
lets try to stick with current affairs.
lets say staying in this  millennium.


_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to Coldwarrior57)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 3:30:57 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
~FR~

There is a place for a few unions, but there are many unions that exist solely to create inflated wages, and/or an illusion of employee welfare. I do not think you can lump unions into any category of good and bad. An example would be the IBEW, and the benchmark of excellence that is set. For larger electrical jobs I would want union workers, but for minor repairs and such a non-union electrician would do just fine.

In 1987, I was a 49% owner in a construction company that did concrete flatwork, including driveways, sidewalks, curbs, and foundations. Our work excellence was set at current union benchmarks of that time. Within a couple of years cheaper labor came along and our jobs were underbid by an average of 40%. There was no way to stay in business as we were doing it.

Unions have their place, but they can sometimes do as much damage as help. The residential construction market is a place where people wanted lower prices on homes, so more people could qualify. It was the demand of the consumer that caused many builders to start using cheaper labor, and materials. Very similar to the demand that the American people have for anything cheaper, just look at how much we buy from China and other places labor is cheap.

If unions bargain for higher wages and benefits, beyond what can be sustained in the market, what will be done then?

As far as safety laws not being enforced, that is an issue that needs to be directed towards the government not doing it's actual job - Enforcing laws and public safety. Why would we want a private substitute to handle the job the government should do?

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 3:37:45 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

When I was a Teamster the only rep I ever saw was one great big fat guy who came to the plant driving a long white Caddy a couple of times per month, and he only made an occasional grievance meeting and took our dues. There was never money in the strike fund and they sure as hell never gave us safety training or anything, the company did that because OSHA required it. Where did all the money go? To the mobsters? The mafia?

Have you ever been a part of a union? They only make it harder to fire the scuz buckets that nobody wants around - all the decent people could handle their own grievances fine on their own. That's been my experience.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

Wrong.  Accidents like these were primary reasons unions started in the first place and unions provide education and safety training to their members.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Unions don't write or enforce fire code, and neither do they write or enforce OSHA regulations. Neither of the industrial accidents you described had anything to do with Unions or the lack thereof.



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 3:38:21 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
The laws and regulation concerning workers safety and buidling codes is not a one sided arrangement.  Training and education and the right equipment helps prevent accidents and deaths and collapsed structures.  Business owners and worker's unions and the government all need to do their part.

_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 3:46:09 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

There is a violent side to unions too, where goons start fires and intimidate people, even getting people killed sometimes.

They're not all that you seem to think that they are.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

The laws and regulation concerning workers safety and buidling codes is not a one sided arrangement.  Training and education and the right equipment helps prevent accidents and deaths and collapsed structures.  Business owners and worker's unions and the government all need to do their part.


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 3:47:16 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
You interpretation is incorrect.  I know about the thuggery and mob connections with certain unions. 

_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 6:09:47 PM   
Coldwarrior57


Posts: 297
Joined: 12/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

And all the circumstances you cite are as a result of Unions....remove them from the equation and who will protect that prevailing wage.....or the thousand other benifits workers have as a result of the good work of unions.

The courts will.


_____________________________

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 6:15:04 PM   
corysub


Posts: 1492
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cjan

Cory, did you read my post regarding contractors who build in Florida who use illegal, non-union labor and simply pocket the savings ? If you did, , read it again and pay attention this time.

Florida has NEVER had union contsruction labor. I'd think you'd know that since you venture an opinion on it.

  Really!  Someone tell the IBEW http://www.ibewflorida.org/orgnotes/060130_miami349.htm

And thanks, so much, for the lesson on economics and how products, including housing, are priced and marketed. What you seem to be ignorant of is that classroom economics rarely have any bearing on real market practices. For example, the housing bubble in my area was due, to a large extent, on contractors ( whom I know ) who took advantage in the early days by buying up, at hugely inflated prices, three homes at a time in an area in which lots were cheap and on which they wished to build.
I think it's good that you know the economics in your neighborhood.  We all should.  However, Miami, West Palm Beach and Orlando were all in the top ten of overbuilt cities in the country so it's more than just a few local contractors buying a few houses on spec.  As far a understanding "comps" tell me your joking...or do you think knowing what a neighbors house sells for is a divine revelation. And please tell me that you don't buy anything because a "real estate appraisor" says it's worth $650,000!  I would hope you know better than that...and that those "pre-construction loans" are there to buy the raw materials with prices jobbed out to specs that a bank feels makes sense on cost per sq/ft.  That's mostly the rule of thumb my bankers used..but hey..maybe in Florida the banks lend money on an estimated selling price not cost price...Nice loan if you can get it.

They used the "comps" ( I hope you know what those are ) made by real estate appraisers (whom I also know ) in order to obtain pre-construction loans from banks and to support their inflated asking prices for the finished product. And, yes, they used non-union, illegal alien labor to build them. THAT's how the free market often operates.

quote:

good news for the guy who uses cheaper labor for the same end result.


But very bad news for the worker who is trying to keep a roof over his own families head, feed them and educate his kids. Btw, if the working person ( think "workin poor " , a lovely term ) can barely make ends meet, then he/she can't possibly buy consumer goods ,new clothes for the kids and other essential things , like a new car, appliances or even take them out to dinner, a ball game or go on vacation. In case you aren't aware, cory, all this consumer spending is what keeps theU.S. economy humming. But wait, what's that silence... ? Oh yeah, it's not humming because, to a large extent, working people don't have the $$ and can't afford to spend.

I thought we were comparing contractors using illegals verus those that don't.  Now you want to talk about workers..an entirely different topic.  Quite a passionate comment and I applaud you for your humanity.


I only wish I was basing my opinon on "Classroom economics"...Please tell my banks that it was all a game and we were not playing for keeps.  As far as Florida being not being

(in reply to cjan)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 6:23:33 PM   
cjan


Posts: 3513
Joined: 2/21/2008
Status: offline
Look, Unions, of course, like anything are not perfect. Yes, there is and has been corruption and various sleezy actions by organized labor. I'm not against re-negotiating labor contracts where it's appropriate, such as tha auto industry.

However, when people complain that U.S. products and manufacturers are at a disadvantage due to cheaper labor costs over seas, the best thing to do is to encourage labor to organize in those foreign countries and collectively bargain for better wages and safer work environments, NOT to stupidly reverse years of social and economic gains enjoyed in this country due to collective bargaining. That the playing field would be more level, everyone's standard of living would improve and foreign workers would have some money to spend on our products, fueling the world economy.

When will U.S. sheeple wake up and stop working and voting against their own best interests ?


_____________________________

"I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself. A bird will fall ,frozen , dead, from a bough without ever having felt sorry for itself."- D.H. L

" When you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks in to you"- Frank Nitti



(in reply to Coldwarrior57)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 6:53:05 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic
    I saw some Youtube video last week of Robert Reich testifying before Charlie Rangel about the stimulus, the importance of rebuilding infrastructure, and that these jobs weren't for white male construction workers, but would go to the long-term unemployed, women and minorities (no shit.  link here).  I had issues with that which had nothing to do with the rascism.


It has EVERYTHING to do with racism!!!!

I saw that same vid...my brother sent it to me weeks ago...not only did Reich say it...but Congressman Rangel reiterated it....it was astounding...more so because not ONE news agency picked it up.

If it had been said about black men (grab the link....listen to it)...every white man on Earth would have been excoriated.

It was no less than astounding.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 7:27:15 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

There is little wonder the Democrats have begun exploring ways to shut down free speech in the form of Fox News and talk radio. CNN won't cover this shit, and the New York Times won't.


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 7:30:56 PM   
aravain


Posts: 1211
Joined: 8/26/2008
Status: offline
I think TheHeretic meant HIS issues with it had nothing to do about the racism involved. Not that it didn't have any racism involved 

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 7:33:24 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
And sexism.

Riech would like women(half the population) to also benefit.

Seems fair.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 7:40:17 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
I've personally seen that exact behavior, even behavior much more extreme than that.

The plant I was working in at the time has all but closed down now, no business can possibly survive in that kind of environment.


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

When a non union hires new younger faster more productive employee his co-workers dont say " Buddy slow down you are making us look bad"
Those words are used often to the new guys at Unions ;)





_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to MasterShake69)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 7:54:36 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
I`ve seen(on the news)white collar types sending poisoned and diseased food out for people to eat.

Dose this mean all management should get a bad rap?

Perhaps so.

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 2/11/2009 7:56:47 PM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 8:09:08 PM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Coldwarrior57

quote:

ORIGINAL: cjan

quote:

ORIGINAL: Steponme73

Union labor drives up the price of construction.  I build and use only non-union.  Skilled people who make a good living, but not raping the consumer.


Nonsense. I know a number of contractors here in Florida who employ illegal ( mostly Mexican ) workers and pay them shit. They DO NOT pass on thier savings costs to consumers. They stuff their own pockets with the difference. Also, having lived in the Midwest for many years where construction labor is mostly union, I deplore the pittance that skilled labor   such as carpenters ) are paid in the non-union south. The cost of the finished product to the home buyer in the south is , almost always, much higher than the same house would cost in the unionized labor north.
Myth: Union-only PLA's reduce construction costs.
 Fact: Union-only requirements limit bidders, force
construction users to pay inflated union wages and
follow outmoded and inefficient union work rules. The
bottom line: Union-only PLA's unnecessarily drive up
costs on projects.

http://www.plawatch.com/mythvsfact.htm
Ah hahahaha right. And for whom does the PLA bell toil? It toils for "Associated Builders and CONtractors is a national association representing more than 23,000 "merit shop" construction and construction-related firms in 80 chapters across the United States."

No, no bias there. None at all.  Just like there'd be no bias in "Myths about our kindly vegetarian lover of kids and small animals Adolf Hitler" by the NASDP.

Like shooting dead fish in a teacup with an M-60.Ae than 23,000 merit shop construction and construction  related firms in 80 chapters across the United States.
ssociated Builders and Contractors (ABC) is a national association representing more than 23,000 merit shop construction and construction  related firms in 80 chapters across the United States. ssociated Builders and Contractors (ABC) is a national association representing more than 23,000 merit shop construction and construction  related firms in 80 chapters across the United States.


_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to Coldwarrior57)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons - 2/11/2009 8:10:42 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
As has been mentioned here before not all unions are the same in terms of their ethics and there are big differences in different parts of the country.
 
What I have seen with family and friends who are in various types of unions is that they are better protected from being mistreated, harrassed and fired without cause and that they have an additional pension upon retirement.  Most of the union representation in my social and family network is for civil servants, educators, truck drivers, mechanics, janitors, farm workers and others who work in agriculture.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
When I was a Teamster the only rep I ever saw was one great big fat guy who came to the plant driving a long white Caddy a couple of times per month, and he only made an occasional grievance meeting and took our dues. There was never money in the strike fund and they sure as hell never gave us safety training or anything, the company did that because OSHA required it. Where did all the money go? To the mobsters? The mafia?

Have you ever been a part of a union? They only make it harder to fire the scuz buckets that nobody wants around - all the decent people could handle their own grievances fine on their own. That's been my experience.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

Wrong.  Accidents like these were primary reasons unions started in the first place and unions provide education and safety training to their members.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Unions don't write or enforce fire code, and neither do they write or enforce OSHA regulations. Neither of the industrial accidents you described had anything to do with Unions or the lack thereof.




_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Union vs non-union construction, pros and cons Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109