RE: Beautiful Minds

RE: Beautiful Minds (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

FullfigRIMAAM1 -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/13/2009 8:48:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance Wow, you know, I think that scening is THE perfect time to talk such things. At least I could blame my blank, glassy stare on the endorphins! I don't think I could even get over with that... I've been told my eyes and face are very expressive. [:D] With trans finite math, I'd probably start laughing hysterically, and kill the mood, just like when I went flying out of bed. M

QuixoticErrant -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/13/2009 9:16:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Cuffkinks I knew My little girl would find her way to this thread. [sm=biggrin.gif] If I may ask, being new here and all, who is she?

QuixoticErrant -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/13/2009 9:25:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FullfigRIMAAM1 quote: ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance Wow, you know, I think that scening is THE perfect time to talk such things. At least I could blame my blank, glassy stare on the endorphins! I don't think I could even get over with that... I've been told my eyes and face are very expressive. [:D] With trans finite math, I'd probably start laughing hysterically, and kill the mood, just like when I went flying out of bed. M Perhaps with that topic, but then again there may be others you are in to. I admit, I was a little surprised she was so interested in the topic myself.On the other hand she is very interested in philosophy and she has read and processed most of the classics.

FullfigRIMAAM1 -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/13/2009 9:32:31 PM)
I was joking.... I actually am turned on by a very smart man, but only if it doesn't accompany an ego the size of God's. What makes me tick is a balanced human being who isn't too self absorbed to apreciate/respect others. I suppose what I try to avoid is the mindset that believes value and goodness lies in his thoughts/beliefs/deeds, and hell is "the others" , paraphrasing what someone famous once said. M

came4U -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/13/2009 9:52:01 PM)
Smart discussions are hot, but I don't want to be the smart one or even close. If I were tied up or engaging in any other sexual activity and still conversing about quantum physics (before, during or after) ....then obviously I am not into the sexual activity at all. If I can talk, think or reason while some dude is 'doing things to me', then I ain't that into you and what you are doing to me isn't doing it for me. I prefer a guy to shut me up, tyvm. Reasoning has it's time and place, which is not when I am being 'fuked' with. Simpler way of saying it: If I remember my own name at the time then YOU SUCK!

QuixoticErrant -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/13/2009 9:58:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FullfigRIMAAM1 I was joking.... I actually am turned on by a very smart man, but only if it doesn't accompany an ego the size of God's. What makes me tick is a balanced human being who isn't too self absorbed to apreciate/respect others. I suppose what I try to avoid is the mindset that believes value and goodness lies in his thoughts/beliefs/deeds, and hell is "the others" , paraphrasing what someone famous once said. M Well, without getting all existentialist.... Seriously, I can't imagine anyone who enjoys imbalanced egotistical sociopaths. Honestly, I don't think it would be possible to have such an engaging and wonderful intellectual discourse like she and I had if there was not a great deal of mutual respect exchanged.

atypicalsub -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/13/2009 10:00:18 PM)
This often happens with Mistress and i. Conversations easily morph from one topic to another where most people would see no relation but to both of us there is a very logical path. Segways through obscure references that somehow make sense to both of us despite growing up in very different enviornments. She explains art to me, i rant about designing geodesic domes, we debate models of the universe, mythology, spirituality, psychology, evolution, and whatever else may cross over. quote: ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW nod I know that one thing that I really want, if we should ever find someone to add to our communion again, is someone who would understand the concept of "Happy Tangent Land"... the idea of a conversation that starts out here (X), and travels this circuitous, scenic journey through realms that one wouldn't even think of as being remotely related... and yet, the track of the conversation makes perfect sense as it goes along... only to end up -back- at (X) at some point (often -hours- later). We used to wake up in the middle of the night to these amazingly complex conversations... they'd just wander around, like professors in their nightgowns, tossing out relevant, but random, concepts for the nearest butterfly net.

QuixoticErrant -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/13/2009 10:08:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: came4U Smart discussions are hot, but I don't want to be the smart one or even close. If I were tied up or engaging in any other sexual activity and still conversing about quantum physics (before, during or after) ....then obviously I am not into the sexual activity at all. If I can talk, think or reason while some dude is 'doing things to me', then I ain't that into you and what you are doing to me isn't doing it for me. I prefer a guy to shut me up, tyvm. Reasoning has it's time and place, which is not when I am being 'fuked' with. Simpler way of saying it: If I remember my own name at the time then YOU SUCK! Believe me I get that. There's a time and a place for that too. I'm thinking that perhaps because she knows we can go into the deeply intellectual, it is now easier for her to go more like you just described. Actually, would any of the submissives here care to comment on that?

came4U -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/13/2009 10:11:25 PM)
I would get into it but I am currently sitting on a big cock and can't think. [:(] jokin. I wish.

MarsBonfire -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/13/2009 10:12:32 PM)
Gallileo used to have this kind of relationship with the church and the Inquisition: He'd advance some theory that would move mankind out of it's dark and dreary world of supernatural theocracy, and they would playfully threaten him and his family with torture and then (ha ha) place him under house arrest for the rest of his life, seperating him from his daughter, never allowing them to see each other. That's the problem with conservative trains of thought: they never give you a safeword. This is what being a good church goer gets you.

QuixoticErrant -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/13/2009 10:15:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MarsBonfire Gallileo used to have this kind of relationship with the church and the Inquisition: He'd advance some theory that would move mankind out of it's dark and dreary world of supernatural theocracy, and they would playfully threaten him and his family with torture and then (ha ha) place him under house arrest for the rest of his life, seperating him from his daughter, never allowing them to see each other. That's the problem with conservative trains of thought: they never give you a safeword. This is what being a good church goer gets you. Pardon me, I am a little confused where this is coming from. Not that I disagree with your history, I just don't follow your context. BTW she has a safe word - it's actually a rather famous, yet not too commonly talked about philosopher and another in-joke.

FullfigRIMAAM1 -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/14/2009 1:41:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: QuixoticErrant Well, without getting all existentialist.... Seriously, I can't imagine anyone who enjoys imbalanced egotistical sociopaths. [:D] quote: came4U If I can talk, think or reason while some dude is 'doing things to me', then I ain't that into you and what you are doing to me isn't doing it for me. I know what you mean... A sure sign that we're not going to become lovers is when I can have great, open, easy conversation on the first date. I like to get a feel for how well we communicate on the phone instead, because the chemistry doesn't interfere as much with my ability to express that way. M

LadyMerrisa -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/14/2009 5:04:05 AM)
Hmm...it must have been really adorable. Naked, bound girl and her Master, discussing about some mathematical theories during session...^-^ And if afterwards you were both able to feel the desire and passion again (even with a double strenght), than there's everything all right ;-) It's just mean, that for you there is no bad time to have a conversation. It's beautiful in my opinion ^-^

hejira92 -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/14/2009 6:13:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: QuixoticErrant quote: ORIGINAL: Cuffkinks I knew My little girl would find her way to this thread. [sm=biggrin.gif] If I may ask, being new here and all, who is she? She's the one who has "Owned and Operated by Cuffkinks since 3/06" in bold letters in her sig line.

Aileen1968 -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/14/2009 6:19:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: QuixoticErrant quote: ORIGINAL: Aileen1968 OMG....I'm supposed to talk to him?!?!?! Depends on if I've used a gag... I have 22 other hours in the day to discuss all kinds of things with him... I'm not wasting intense times to talk about physics. But if that floats your boat...it just seems that you're starting to come across with the "I'm better and more refined than you" vibe. It could be that I haven't had enough coffee yet this morning, but that's the impression I'm getting.

feydeplume -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/14/2009 6:23:02 AM)
Two thoughts... There can be a lot of just standing around waiting for the D to get the ropes and chains sorted out and small talk can make that more comfortable while you are shivering and trying not to be bored. Mind fucks come in all shapes and sized so taking a highly vocal and intellectualizing (often a protective coping skill) person from that mental space all the way to non vocal is kinda hot.

QuixoticErrant -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/14/2009 7:54:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyMerrisa Hmm...it must have been really adorable. Naked, bound girl and her Master, discussing about some mathematical theories during session...^-^ And if afterwards you were both able to feel the desire and passion again (even with a double strenght), than there's everything all right ;-) It's just mean, that for you there is no bad time to have a conversation. It's beautiful in my opinion ^-^ Thank you very much. I think you hit on something there. If you can talk like that even in session, there is a great deal of closeness and that builds trust which will make the next session all the more awesome.

QuixoticErrant -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/14/2009 7:56:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aileen1968 quote: ORIGINAL: QuixoticErrant quote: ORIGINAL: Aileen1968 OMG....I'm supposed to talk to him?!?!?! Depends on if I've used a gag... I have 22 other hours in the day to discuss all kinds of things with him... I'm not wasting intense times to talk about physics. But if that floats your boat...it just seems that you're starting to come across with the "I'm better and more refined than you" vibe. It could be that I haven't had enough coffee yet this morning, but that's the impression I'm getting. I'm really surprised you feel that way. Not my goal at all.

LadyMerrisa -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/14/2009 11:09:24 AM)
Hmm...I haven't noticed any conceit in OP's words. He's not proclaming: "Oh, listen everyone! I'm better than all of you, cause I am discussing about mathemathic, even while playing BDSM scene! And you're not, haha!". He's just sharing his experiance - which he considered amusing and worthy to mention - with us. And I think, that this is one of the main functions of internet formus - exchange of opinions and experiences ;-)

came4U -> RE: Beautiful Minds (2/14/2009 11:16:20 AM)
The only thing I noticed is that I fell for it again because of my lack of attention span in keeping track of who's who. Last week the OP had a stalker, days later he discussed angst at telling his wife about his D/s desires, now he has a play partner I guess. I wish I could remove statements here now, scruplistically (made up word) I cannot fathom commenting or contributing attention towards anyone who intentionally cheats on his spouse. To do so would seem too much like advocating their behaviour.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875