came4U
Posts: 3572
Joined: 1/23/2007 From: London, Ontario Status: offline
|
quote:
My issue isn't with poverty. Circumstances happen, especially now with mass lay offs. That is what I meant by intent..not environmental challenges/changes. People with 'intent to improve' gradually over time, who overcome social boundaries to accomplish many things using many aquired and varied skills. This has nothing to do with a guy who went bankrupt last week, this has everything to do with a guy who is 40+ and has zero accomplishment to even compare to someone who lost more than that other person even has proven so far. That man who went bankrupt likely has the potential to again improve through sheer determination (domination) of his surroundings. is why I said: quote:
Defend poverty all you want, but someone who is 'intentionally' poor is not going to turn my crank. Someone like this is either mentally challenged or has no intent on controlling his environment/surroundings to be calling himself a dominant. quote:
It's being completely negative, getting upset when someone else finds the negativity unattractive, and then blaming others for the situation. I agree. It is the same for people that expect something for nothing. New money or old money issue aside, educated or highschool dropout, if you are any kind of dominant personality....expect the 'average' submissive's choice to be someone of higher quality, intel and financial position to be higher than the submissive her/himself. That is life. Why choose a man of weaker social/economic and academic status to dominate? Even for play, some can do so (because they don't care to know how unworldly he actually is). I don't get it, I never will. I have to highly respect a man in many ways before I consider him a dominant. A simple man of little means,brains and/or ability can only dominante me (or some others) by brute force or unconsensual kidnapping. That doesn't mean I would respect him via natural time and form. Despite the concept of Stockholm Syndrome, the thought of love and respect would be artificial in concept...therefore 'useless' in my ideal of lifestyle-adaptive reality. A millionaire could kidnap a gal, doesn't mean he is less of a goofball who didn't use his brains to aquire polite social skills and a means of manipulating the world (even women) around him to do his bidding. When we are adults, a goof personality is still a goof. A native Indian has been raised by birth to hunt, trap and be brave in the face of danger.....if you cannot live off the fat of the land, contribute, be generous and show some dignity to that clan then you are pretty well useless to the entire society. Nothing has changed, furs and meats just turned into cotton and paper. Don't expect someone who prefers meat and fur to be impressed when all you have is ..... factory processed burger and a bus pass to nowhere.
< Message edited by came4U -- 2/21/2009 12:56:51 PM >
|