Amaros
Posts: 1363
Joined: 7/25/2005 Status: offline
|
Not surprisingly, wiiwd attracts a lot of very anal people, like one guy who posted a list of something like 400 rules in here one time, it must have taken him weeks and he was mocked accordingly - second, it also attracts a lot of exhibitionists, who love to talk about everything they do (me) - now neither of these things is really a bad thing, but combine it with a control freak personality type and you get rules - no different really than Catholics who insist on the missionary position, or Quiverfulls who insist that every act of sex include the possibility of impregnation: i.e., these are exactly the same type of people, except that the ones involved in BDSM aren't trying to shove it down my throat or make it a constitutional amendment. If that's what get's their propeller spinning, more power to 'em, and I'm happy it works for them - just as some people like to make rules, there are other people that like to follow them. I'm more of a seat-of-the-pants kinda guy myself, I believe that very strict discipline is necessary because it actually gives you more time to fuck off but you can still snap when you have to, just my personal take on the subject, I do like to fuck off but I also have responsibilities. I don't have to read it if I don't want to, and I can take it with a grain of salt when I do - but, in fact, sometimes you do learn something, get some inspiration, discover something you've never heard articulated before, or things you never thought about, etc., i.e, you can cherry pick, it ain't a religion, it's just a thang. We are many, if not all of of us, explorers, sexual psychonauts navigating blindly in the darkness of the subconscious, and it's always interesting to hear the reports of other explorers, they are in a sense, maps; everybody's map may be a little bit different, but sometimes hearing the experiences of others is not only educational, it's also comforting to know that others wrestle with the same questions and conflicts you do, even if they resolve them a bit differently than you might. And if nothing else, it reiterates the perspective: different strokes for different folks.
< Message edited by Amaros -- 2/18/2009 4:15:53 PM >
|