RainydayNE
Posts: 978
Joined: 10/21/2008 Status: offline
|
a previous poster stated the exact reason why i also am not an organ donor on my license. if they're more concerned with my parts, they'll worry about that, rather than saving me. and i don't necessarily like that. my family/loved ones will know my stance on it, and if there is nothing that can be done, they'll know what to do. but i don't want to be considered spare parts before my life has been saved =p anyway lessee... i don't agree with abortion, but i agree with people having some sort of self-determination. first of all, very VERY few people discuss the horrible emotional problems that plague alot of women who get abortions OR the fact that there are unscrupulous doctors selling abortions to women who don't actually even need them. also, NOBODY ever deals with the issue of fetal pain. if they can kick and suck their thumbs, certainly they can feel themselves being dismembered. have you ever met Giana Jessen? she's one of the more famous people who survived being aborted. it DOES happen, and it isn't pretty. whether you consider them viable or not, i don't believe you have sanction to be cruel to them. second, a father's rights activist raised a really REALLY good point that most women will never consider -- if a woman has a right to kill a fetus, why doesn't the man have the right to say "i won't financially support it when it gets here." it's her body, it's his money, right? which one is worth more? life or the potential for it, or money? so... i think people should take responsibility for themselves. abortions should NOT be used as birth control. there are legitimate issues like rape and incest where a woman who feels forced to carry the product of such a heinous act might end up killing herself over it. and you have cases of medical issues where you either abort the (or one, in the case of high-risk multiples) fetus, or the mother dies. so many grey areas. but in general, i side with "pro-life." sure, a fetus may not be able to survive outside the womb on its own, but neither can the "parasite" in a conjoined twin system. the dependant twin is still considered a life form, isn't it? the death penalty is interesting, too. i swing back and forth on it. on one hand, i have no problem with retribution. eye for an eye, and all that rot. it has nothing to do with keeping crime down, it obviously isn't doing that. but i think it serves another purpose, and i think servantboyforyou (i think i got that right) outlined it well. the grey area there, of course, is how many people are sitting on death row who are truly innocent? how many people have been excuted already only to be exonerated by DNA? can we ever trust a system run by humans to be 110% accurate and keep innocent people from being killed for something they didnt do? with right to die, i think if you want to check out, you should be able to.
|