Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Acceptable Murder


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Acceptable Murder Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/3/2009 7:36:06 PM   
slaveboyforyou


Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005
From: Arkansas, U.S.A.
Status: offline
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_7

The above is an escape incident from a Texas prison by lifers and guys doing long sentences.  They killed a police officer when they robbed a sporting goods store.  Other incidents like that have occurred throughout American correctional systems. 

Kittin, prisons are complicated facilities to run.  They get every stripe of social misfit in there.  In order to maintain order, they have to give prisoners incentives to behave.  Otherwise, they couldn't control it.  If they seperated all the violent inmates into once facility, they'd have a prison full of plotting, violent psychopaths with barely any hope of rescue from their fate.  Escape would be a constant problem; you would not beleive how ingenious people can be when they are locked up with nothing to do.  They're dangerous.

You can't compare our prison system with other Western nations.  We are so much larger, and we have a lot more violent crime than anyone else. 

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/3/2009 7:42:57 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou
We are so much larger, and we have a lot more violent crime than anyone else. 


No, slaveboy - it just takes political will and popular support, and the death penalty can be abolished for the benefit of society as a whole. It's just an unpopular issue in America, but the fact remains that the death penalty contributes to violence in society; it does not suppress it. How about America got tough on the causes of  violent crime?


_____________________________



(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/3/2009 7:46:23 PM   
Lashra


Posts: 4900
Joined: 2/9/2006
Status: offline
Abortion-I am Pro-choice. What a woman does with her own body is her decision. I do not feel that anyone else has the right to tell her otherwise. It is her decision up until the point that child breathes on its own. I believe that our children should be taught about birth control, I believe pregnant women should be counseled on their alternatives to giving birth if they ask for them.

Executions-I am for executions in specific crime cases. I also do not believe that prisoners should sit on death row for years. Perhaps a few weeks at most and then carry out the sentence.

Right to die- I support the right to die. Again what a person does with their own body when they are so sick and in pain is their choice. I think physician assisted suicide should be legal all over the USA.

Pulling the plug-If this is the persons wish then carry it out.

These are my opinions and I have no intention of arguing about them. Opinions were asked for and I gave them.

~Lashra


_____________________________

“We can never judge the lives of others, because each person knows only their own pain and renunciation. It's one thing to feel that you are on the right path, but it's another to think that yours is the only path.”






(in reply to StrangerThan)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/3/2009 7:53:59 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lashra
I also do not believe that prisoners should sit on death row for years. Perhaps a few weeks at most and then carry out the sentence.


This would be refusing them due process and take away their right to appeal the sentence, thus making the legal system even more unbalanced and unethical than it already is.

_____________________________



(in reply to Lashra)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/3/2009 7:59:05 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: rubberpet
I don't expect a lot of people to share my view and I'm not looking to start a ranting and raving debate about it.


So you just want to make a statement and not have anyone comment on it? Because I'll be honest: after I read your post, my fingers itched to type a lengthy reply  .


OK, I can go watch BSG then. I was waiting for me screen to start smokin. I have to admit though. I pretty much agreed with your first post. I'm just too tired to put it into words myself.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/3/2009 8:11:29 PM   
UPSG


Posts: 331
Joined: 1/22/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Of course condoms aren't infallible: that's why abortions are necessary at times. My heart bleeds for men who were tricked into fathering offsprings against their will: but in the end, there is another person born partly because of them that needs to be fed, clothed and brought up. I have a feeling that this 'Roe for men" thing is a way for some men to try and get their own back and regain a kind of power they feel they have lost. The problem with that is that their children still need to eat. This isn't a perfect world: perhaps men should abstain from sexual activity altogether, since women are such manipulative creatures  .


Kittin, as a matter of observational science pregnant women already carry another human life - a child or children - in them. Birthing this human out of the womb does not magically turn it into a child. In fact a fetus requires food as well, it is also harmed by say... the mother smoking crack (even though it is regarded as an abstract choice as those that ponder when human life begin scratch the tops of their heads beffudled) not so unlike a 4 year old child (mind you that looks different and is cognitively different than a 15 year old and 72 year old person) smoking crack would have his or her brain chemistry altered over time.

So, providing for a child, protection and nurturing of a child, begins months before that child's birth. When a woman aborts - or toss a child in a dumpster - she declines her motherly obligation. Is a 17 year old boy so much more sinister than the 25 year old woman that wants to "party like a rock star" when they both decline their obligation? I think not. The 25 year old woman is given legal protection to do so so long as she aborts the child before birth.

What "Roe for Men" ask is that if the woman wants the child let her take on full financial responsibility for her choice. If something is a choice of a biologically separate person, than another person that was given no say or choice in that matter should not be responsible for anothers choice (e.g. a man has no say in whether his child can be born).

Women when they want an abortion insinuate it takes only one to create the child, ergo "It's my body, it's my choice" (strangely that argument does not work for crack smoking, heroin use, or attempting suicide, in which case the state may incracerate a person). But when they want the child all of a sudden every pro-choice woman amazingly comprehends the contribution of the father in creating that child - then it becomes, "Be a man," I didn't do this on my own and it took the two of us.

Your comments presume that if a man does not want a child he should ensure he does not get a woman pregnant - otherwise he ought 1950ish style stand up and "Be a man." Yet, your comments are silent on women taking responsibility not to get pregnant - as though they have no choice or are to dumb to figure out they do not have to allow a penis with no condom on inside them. But we don't demand women stand up 1950ish style and be "real women."



At any rate, it is clear you and I don't see eye to eye on this. Disagreement is part of life. I suspect there are other things in life we probably find agreement on though. So, I hope our disagreement does not leave hard feelings (I realize certain issues arouse passion or annoyance in us all) and we can still remain friends.



(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/3/2009 8:12:25 PM   
slaveboyforyou


Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005
From: Arkansas, U.S.A.
Status: offline
quote:

No, slaveboy - it just takes political will and popular support,


How does politcal will and popular support prevent violent criminals from escaping prison to commit more crimes?  Didn't I just hear about another helicopter escape from a French prison by violent criminals?  What if the next time, they kill 8 or 9 people breaking out?  What if they take a bunch of people hostage?  Life imprisonment does not seperate violent criminals from society. 

I don't buy into this idea that violence begets violence.  The Japanese have one of the most orderly societies in the world, and they use the death penalty. 

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/3/2009 8:15:21 PM   
SpinnerofTales


Posts: 1586
Joined: 5/30/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana
.
1-That assumes that morally and ethically a man can walk out on his kids.
and
2-It assumes equally that morally and ethically a woman couldn't do it.



I was not talking about morality or ethics. I was talking possibility. A man can physically remove himself from an unwanted pregnancy. A woman cannot. That's not legislation. It's biological necessity.

As for abandoning children, I know some people are conscienceless about this. I forget the state at the moment, but one state passed a law that a child could be left at a hospital without legal action being taken against the parent. They forgot to put an age limit. Some "parents" were dropping off teenagers! Proof that even a dog can have offspring, it takes something more to be a parent.



(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/3/2009 8:24:12 PM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rubberpet


Once again...my opinion are my opinions.  Like 'em, dislike 'em...either way, I really don't care.  If you want take time out of your busy day to criticize and critique the opinions of someone you don't know and probably will never meet because they don't match yours, then so be it.  I don't criticize your opinion on the death penalty because everyone has their own viewpoint on the subject. 


Well, fair enough. That's just kind of what we do, though, is comment on the opinions people toss out. Positive and negative. I've read enough of your posts to know I'd like you personally no matter what your view of the death penalty, but you have to admit, your opinion was a radical one, and it's a passionate subject. If you don't want to argue about it, no harm done. Thanks for sharing it, anyway!


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to rubberpet)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/3/2009 8:26:30 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
      I haven't read the thread, but strictly to the questions of the OP;

Abortion:  Right up to the point where we can just induce labor and adopt out a preemie.  The sovereignty of an individual over their body wins the values conflict.

Execution:  I support the death penalty, and think we should use it more often than we do.  Some crimes demand the ultimate sanction.  The social compact trumps the individual.

Right to die:  Again, the sovereignty of the individual over their body remains the higher value

Pulling the plug:  Ok.  This one is harder.  The people who might be asked to make such a decision on my behalf know what I think about persistent vegetative states.  I know how my father feels if anyone ever asked, and I would fight for accordance with what he has told me.  If I were ever forced to make a decision without that knowledge, I would be able to make it, but it would haunt me.  It would haunt me no matter which way I chose.

< Message edited by TheHeretic -- 3/3/2009 8:29:35 PM >


_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to StrangerThan)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/3/2009 8:28:39 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
quote:


These are my opinions and I have no intention of arguing about them. Opinions were asked for and I gave them.

~Lashra




       If only we were all as sensible as you, Lashra. 

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to Lashra)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/3/2009 10:42:26 PM   
rubberpet


Posts: 1743
Joined: 4/6/2006
From: The Land of Voodoo
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: rubberpet


Once again...my opinion are my opinions.  Like 'em, dislike 'em...either way, I really don't care.  If you want take time out of your busy day to criticize and critique the opinions of someone you don't know and probably will never meet because they don't match yours, then so be it.  I don't criticize your opinion on the death penalty because everyone has their own viewpoint on the subject. 


Well, fair enough. That's just kind of what we do, though, is comment on the opinions people toss out. Positive and negative. I've read enough of your posts to know I'd like you personally no matter what your view of the death penalty, but you have to admit, your opinion was a radical one, and it's a passionate subject. If you don't want to argue about it, no harm done. Thanks for sharing it, anyway!



Right back at ya, Panda!  I do have a more radical opinion than most and do feel very passionate about it.  In fact, I think that's how we eventually got the strength of the justice system.  We probably had radicals on one side, conservatives on the other, and we compromised and met in the middle.  Our justice system is far from perfect, but I think it more than does the job properly. 

_____________________________

Collared and devoted property of Mistress Lorelei (vampchick88) as of 3/26/08.

Rubberpet - The Resident Anti-Subby and mysterious shadowy figure known as Voodoo, proud hitman and wiseguy for the Subby Mafia.


(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/3/2009 11:20:14 PM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline
I'm with boijen: there's pro-choice and anti-choice. Saying one is "pro-life" is like saying one is "pro-air". Who in the fuck is against air? I'm firmly pro-choice.

I'm also firmly pro-life imprisonment. When is it moral for a group of people (the State) to do that which it is immoral for one person to do (take a life with premeditation)? I say never. That's a waste of potential labor which could benefit society. Say, raising veggies for women's shelters, things like that.

Right to die: I am for it as part of a program of compassionate palliation, which includes counseling and medication for those who suffer from long-term severe, major depression.

"Pulling the plug": Living Wills must be obeyed, IMO. In cases where there are no explicit instructions, and the patient has a Trust (including Wills), those legal documents should be examined and any who would be beneficiaries should be prohibited from taking part in the decision-making process. Non-beneficiary family members should make that decision in consultation with a panel of doctors and medical ethicists. In cases where the patient is intestate, his closest family members whould make that decision, in consultation with a panel of doctors and medical ethicists.  I haven't given much thought to this situation; I may revise my opinion after more deliberation.

Panda: very moving. You have my sympathy for not only your loss but also having had to endure such a difficult trial.

_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/4/2009 3:52:19 AM   
hizgeorgiapeach


Posts: 1672
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan

Abortion. If you are a pro-choice person, is there a point where you view the process as murder or is it until birth, a choice?
  I am pretty staunchly pro-choice, but within a few limitations.  Once the fetus is capable of sustaining it's own life, without the aid of machinery, termination is not a viable option - inducing early and adopting said spawn out is.

quote:

Executions: Regardless of whether or not they deter criminals, do you think executing someone for the murder of another to be an acceptable form of punishment? If not, are there instances where it would be?
  This is a very crowded lil mudball we all call home.  Yes, I consider it an acceptable form of punishment for certain crimes.  There are, unfortunately, a lot of Truely Stupid people born - people who lack the intellect to learn from merely locking them away from the rest of society at society's expense.  It is no different than putting down a rapid animal who is a threat to society when the person is simply to unintelligent (not uneducated - UnIntelligent) to learn from their mistakes.

[quote/Right to die: How do you view right to die laws that exist for the terminally ill? Should it be a right in your view? Or do you believe that medical science has evolved to a point where one can die in peace without suffering? If you were the person making the decision, what would drive that process, fear? Economics? What?  I'd like to shoot the politicians who would legislate the right to die out of existance.  Spend a few years of your life watching someone suffer Daily, who prays Fervently for the release of death to put a stop to their suffering - but who, because of politics, stupidity, and medical professionals who think they should play Diety - isn't allowed to find that sucrease from pain.  It changes your perspective a bit.  It is a fact of existance that eventually, we all cease to exist.  Trying to overcome that fact does not change it - it only makes the portion at the end less tolerable.

quote:

Pulling the plug: One of the areas in which I've always found pro-lifers to be inconsistent in defending life is removing others from life support. Aside from Terri Shaivo (sp), it is a common practice done in hospitals every day that generates little if any uproar. But in a technical sense, it is taking the life of another person. A few months ago a story ran on the front page of Yahoo about a man who had been brain dead, or at least thought to be, for 17 years who suddenly woke and came back with most if not all of his mental faculties. If you were called upon to make that decision, do you feel it to be one that could haunt you?
Having been involved in this very decision a few years back, when my mother was on life support, it doesn't haunt me at all.  She'd been in excruciating pain for years, which even the strongest pain medications did nothing to Remove - only limit sufficiently to tolerate another day without blowing her own brains out to get it over with.  She had made it plain during those years that she absolutely did NOT want to be kept alive artificially.  She had put it in writing, in the form of a  medical Advanced Directive - although at that point in time, doctors in this state would still ask the family whether or not to follow an AD.  We - dad and I - gave the doctors a specific amount of time to find a means of getting her off the machines and living out the rest of her life without the aid of those devices.  When they finally admitted, at the end of that time, that it simply wasn't possible - we told them to pull the plug.  (And then I reamed the doctor in the hallway, out of hearing of my father, for having given him false hope at the Beginning of that 3 day wait to see whether they would be able to find a method.)  We sat there with her during that final hour, saying our goodbyes.  Only to be accused of murder by my grandmother the bat once it was all over - if the choice had been left up to her, mom would Still be in the hospital, in an ICU ward, forever on a machine.

_____________________________

Rhi
Light travels faster than sound, which is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Essential Scentsations

(in reply to StrangerThan)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/4/2009 4:14:14 AM   
Aynne88


Posts: 3873
Joined: 8/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rubberpet

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: rubberpet


Once again...my opinion are my opinions.  Like 'em, dislike 'em...either way, I really don't care.  If you want take time out of your busy day to criticize and critique the opinions of someone you don't know and probably will never meet because they don't match yours, then so be it.  I don't criticize your opinion on the death penalty because everyone has their own viewpoint on the subject. 


Well, fair enough. That's just kind of what we do, though, is comment on the opinions people toss out. Positive and negative. I've read enough of your posts to know I'd like you personally no matter what your view of the death penalty, but you have to admit, your opinion was a radical one, and it's a passionate subject. If you don't want to argue about it, no harm done. Thanks for sharing it, anyway!



Right back at ya, Panda!  I do have a more radical opinion than most and do feel very passionate about it.  In fact, I think that's how we eventually got the strength of the justice system.  We probably had radicals on one side, conservatives on the other, and we compromised and met in the middle.  Our justice system is far from perfect, but I think it more than does the job properly


You do? I wonder if the thousands of people unjustly accused share that opinion. I wish I had that kind of blind faith in the system. Not gonna happen.  Governement sanctioned murder isn't "radical." Radical is making a change and making a difference, finding a solution that really works, not some archaic outdated incompetent system where we kill innocent people and even the killing of the guilty ones does nothing to prevent future crime. It has been proven over and over again to not be a deterrent.  

_____________________________

As long as people will shed the blood of innocent creatures there can be no peace, no liberty, no harmony between people. Slaughter and justice cannot dwell together.
—Isaac Bashevis Singer, writer and Nobel laureate (1902–1991)



(in reply to rubberpet)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/4/2009 4:52:51 AM   
hizgeorgiapeach


Posts: 1672
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

Unfortunately about transplants, time is critical. The way around this, and every other medical ethics question is to sign the forms when you are well. Have a signed and notarized health proxy giving someone the right to make the decisions and tell them what decisions you want made. That's the sensible thing to do.

How many of us on this thread have done that? Or given a durable power of attorney?
For years, I had a durable PoA signed, as well as Health Proxy which was part of my PoA - unfortunately, one of the two people who was listed is dead, and the other is currently dying.  Which means I need to write a new one - given I find someone I actually trust to carry through with what *I would want done, rather than getting emotional about it and doing what They want.  It's a bit of a quandry for me, really.  My older spawn is of legal age, but mentally incompitant - and therefore not an option.  My younger spawn is not of legal age to make such decisions for herself, let alone for someone else, and it would therefore fall on the sperm donor that sired her - not someone I would trust to make an intelligent decision about whether or not to tie a pair of shoe laces, much less follow through on my wishes medically.  In fact - I would expect him to do the exact Opposite of what I have in advanced directives - simply out of spite.  I am unmarried, I have no boyfriend nor likely to have any sort of significant other for the remainder of my life.  I trust my sibling even less than I trust the spawn's father.  I have a few close friends that I would trust with such a responcibility - but do I really have the right to ask such a service from them?

I am dad's Power of Attorney.  I am his Health Proxy.  There are copies of his living will, advance directive, etc all on file with the hospital, his PCP, the Hospice company, his former Nursing Home, his attorney (who is also my attorney) and 3 copies in my possession should anything happen and he go to a hospital other than the one which has a copy permanently on file.  We've discussed - in great detail and at some length - what he expects, what he wants, and what he would be Seriously Angry about should I make a decision other than those which we've already discussed.  Fortunately, our views of what we would individually Want done, or would chose for others, are the same.

_____________________________

Rhi
Light travels faster than sound, which is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Essential Scentsations

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/4/2009 5:01:33 AM   
TNstepsout


Posts: 1558
Joined: 8/3/2005
Status: offline
"Legislatively. And essentially that's all that matter. It's similar to charging interests on loans or state and or federal taxes, regardless of what anyone feels on the matter morally or ethically one way or the other that these things are legal grants them a presumed innocence of right, especially in a U.S. culture which typically views morality through the prism of what's legal or illegal (e.g. alcohol vs cocaine)."

OK- I'm doing this a little differently because we have a weird thing going on with the quotes.

What kind of legislation are you talking about? Legally men can be porn stars too. Legally men can have 12 lovers and Legally men don't need abortions. So what are you talking about?

(in reply to UPSG)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/4/2009 5:13:22 AM   
StrangerThan


Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan

I had this talk with my girl this morning. She works in the medical field and has both a more pragmatic and probably realistic view of life and death. And before I pose the questions, understand I have no real answers for anyone else. I think in terms of my personal choices and what they would be on a given subject.

So here they are.

Abortion. If you are a pro-choice person, is there a point where you view the process as murder or is it until birth, a choice?

Executions: Regardless of whether or not they deter criminals, do you think executing someone for the murder of another to be an acceptable form of punishment? If not, are there instances where it would be?

Right to die: How do you view right to die laws that exist for the terminally ill? Should it be a right in your view? Or do you believe that medical science has evolved to a point where one can die in peace without suffering? If you were the person making the decision, what would drive that process, fear? Economics? What?

Pulling the plug: One of the areas in which I've always found pro-lifers to be inconsistent in defending life is removing others from life support. Aside from Terri Shaivo (sp), it is a common practice done in hospitals every day that generates little if any uproar. But in a technical sense, it is taking the life of another person. A few months ago a story ran on the front page of Yahoo about a man who had been brain dead, or at least thought to be, for 17 years who suddenly woke and came back with most if not all of his mental faculties. If you were called upon to make that decision, do you feel it to be one that could haunt you?



I posted this thread because death can be and most often is an intensely personal experience, and because my own thinking has evolved over the years to where things don't sit in shades of black and white anymore but contain a lot of gray areas. Much of that has come about because I actually put thought into it, rather than followed along behind some sloganeer. Over the years, I've heard and used many of the catch phrases I've seen here and recognize them as waypoints on the road to the notions I currently hold. Another driving force behind posting a thread I knew would be divisive in some ways, wasn't to highlight those differences, but get true opinion.

I used to support the right to an abortion 100 percent. Now, I know, there are people who like to couch that term in different words, things like pro-choice, anti-choice, or pro-life. We tend to do that as a society, create terms that are more sanitary and more removed from the actual action in order to make it more palatable to more people. The truth is though, the base line concept is the right to end a life. Opponents call it murder. Proponents call it a choice.

Personally, I think its a bit of both. People will debate when and where a fetus becomes a baby all day long. For some that moment is conception. For others it is when they can hold it in their hands. I've written some... probably harsh words on the topic, saying at one point that when you can jerk it out, stick a bottle in its mouth and it doesn't die, then I'll agree its murder. I've also written that I see nothing sacred about life in general, that the one thing the human race has proven itself capable of regardless of war, famine or feast, is reproduction. I've written that I didn't believe that life itself was anything close to a miracle, that God gave you the ability and therefore didn't need to oversee the production line of human bodies that the ability would become.

Over the years I've watched the battles. When pro-lifers couldn't strike down the right up front, they began working on it piece by piece. I've watched pro-choice people defend each of those pieces even when they fly in the face of common sense. And in that is where my thoughts on the matter currently lie. I do not support the its my body sentiment. It may be your body, but the life within it is not yours. I do believe in personal liberty however and that is probably the only thing that keeps me on the pro-choice side of the debate. I believe that choice crosses a line somewhere though to where it becomes a choice to kill. If I were writing legislation to deal with it, I'm not sure where I'd put that line, but late term choices aren't choices to me. They are killing. It is understandable in some cases where health or life of the mother is at stake, but to simply decide I think is wrong and will no longer support. I also believe there are some father's rights issues left to be addressed. Face it, it took two to create, and part of the life growing is part of him. In fact, in this age of worrying about what everyone else feels and thinks, this area may eventually be the inroad the pro-life camp needs to stop some abortions. And there is the fact that viability is an issue where the dates are pushed further and further back each year. I don't buy the argument that you have to wait until it can survive on its own. The same people who would argue that, would be incensed if their son, mother, father were left to die after an operation because they needed a breathing tube or feeding tube and were not considered viable on their own.

By the same token, the right to die issue has always befuddled me. I've never understood those who claim to be compassionate denying someone the right to choose a more dignified and less painful manner of passing when the option of passing or remaining didn't exist. I've seen hospice at work and know the care they give. I know the quality of it, and the drugged out wait for that last breath. That's all fine and dandy. I can agree that the final moments are fairly peaceful. It is a long road to those final moments in many cases though. The few days of morphine induced peace at the end of it, is I suppose for those who would deny that right, the reward for the weeks of fear, pain, and reduction in the quality of life that come with dying slowly. My own thoughts on the matter come from watching loved ones die slowly. Three from cancer, a couple from alzheimers (sp). Hospice is a great place to end up in those cases. It is a shitty road getting there. What I take from this debate isn't the right to die, but rights in general when it comes to personal choices and liberty. I don't think that right should extend to just anyone, but to those who have no option as to whether they live or die, it should.

Honestly I've never put much thought into executions even though I included it on the list. If we're certain the person is guilty, then I have no problem with it at all. I'd much rather see all the parlimentary procedures reduced in those cases and the sentence handed down in a swifter manner. Then again, certainty is an issue. I can see the debate there where the innocent might be wrongfully executed. In many cases however, there is no uncertainty. When there's none, I'd rather it be done than left to linger.

The final issue of pulling the plug, is something I would hate to do. I could and would. I can honestly say though that I hope I'm never in that position. I do consider it an acceptable form of killing in our society. If you kept them alive for whatever reason, and then decide to terminate for whatever reason, the time of death is not listed at the point a brain died or at the point an accident occurrred. It is listed at the point they cease to live. If anything, this debate has pushed me to get a living will done. My girl, who as I said before works in the medical field, told me last night that her understanding was to never pull a plug if the family members were against it, no matter what a living will stated. So those who argued that point, have a valid point.

I'm not arguing with anyone here, just posting my own thoughts on it. I'm the kind of person who always leans towards personal rights and liberties, but there is a need for common sense within that leaning. Unfettered right is as dysfunctional for a society as is heavy handed rule. I think some of these issues, particularly abortion, are the driving force behind what has become a politically and socially polarized nation. I think if we are ever to close that gap and learn again to live peacefully with each other we're going to have to find a compromise somewhere.

My 3 cents.

(in reply to StrangerThan)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/4/2009 5:48:12 AM   
BoiJen


Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Nope, if you were God you wouldn't give a shit about what human beings get up to. You'd be too busy basking in your eternity.



Wrong. I take responsibility seriously. Which where I see a problem with the Christian concept. "God" has not taken responsibility for his creation...man. It's like a dead beat dad who doesn't pay child support. It's a half done shitty job as far as I'm concerned. Where as if I were "God" I'd be paying child support and being an active role in my kids' lives. Then again that's a different matter entirely.

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Acceptable Murder - 3/4/2009 6:21:22 AM   
Irishknight


Posts: 2016
Joined: 9/30/2007
Status: offline
I read through the whole thing and pretty much saw what I expected.  Here's my answers.

Abortion: It is not my choice.  However since I have wanted a child for years, any woman that aborted my child would no longer be dating me in any way.  That is my choice.  I would be more than happy to care for any child I helped create so if that chance is taken from me, I will go seek someone whose views are more like my own.

Death Penalty: There are many circumstances when the death penalty should be used for the protection of society.  It currently has excessive retrials and other garbage that make it more expensive but it can and has worked in the past.  In fact, the so called "wild west" had guns everywhere and public executions and in fact had a far lower rate of crime than most "civilized" countries today.  The death penalty does not creat more crime.  It stopped Ted Bundy, among others, from getting out (escaping) and killing others. 

Right to Die:  Gods, let a man fall on his sword and give himself a dignified death.  I would much rather kneel and ritually disembowel myself than have to lie wasting in a hospital bed in years of agony.  I realize most would choose something less painful than my above choices but I like the imagery.

Pulling the plug:  My grandmother had a do not resuscitate/ no machines order for the hospital.  The doctors ignored it and brought her back after she passed the first time and would have kept her on machines had we not been around to fight for her wishes.  She was terrified for the last 15 minutes of her life when she could have passed peacefully except for the arrogance of some asshat MD.  If I am only a machine kept vegetable, pull the plug and turn me into some ashes.  Pour me in the concrete used to make a statue of me but make sure the statue has a bigger dick than I did in real life.

_____________________________

What man is a man who does not make his world better?


Soldiers died for your right to be ungrateful.

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Acceptable Murder Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094