LaTigresse
Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael I wanted to add that part of what fueled this for me is that the whole bit with "my way or the highway" is that where is the skill in that? Where is the dominance? Where is the molding/shaping/guidance in that? I just wanted to address the part I bolded. Two things that I see often twisted around and overly romanticised. The skill aspect. Assuming we are discussing relationships and not whipping techniques, skill is, in my mind, not the best word to use. Or if so, take it out of context as being only a dominant skill. ALL people need good relationship skills, not just the dominant party in a relationship. We figuratively beat people over the head with this concept, on the forums, all the time. Phrases like "The common denominator is you!!" etc.. As for "where is the dominance" well, it doesn't take a skilled rocket scientist to have a dominant personality. Hell, I've got a 12# canine that is more dominant than most people I know. No skill in that, she just is, it is her personality. Now, being a sucessful leader in a relationship, especially a power exchange relationship, is going to take a combination of things. Good relationship skills, mastery of self, maturity, and a dominant personality.....to make it work. While the phrase "my way or the highway" may be used negatively by many, may have a negative feel about it to many, it really is a concept that is the foundation of a power exchange relationship. It simply takes a lot of mature communication to discover what those "ways" are and whether or not they are compatible. What I see as being a bad thing, is constantly making "my way" too fluid. Too dependant upon keeping the other person, keep them happy, just so they don't "hit the highway". We are all drawn to a power exchange relationship, whatever it is to us, for a reason. The question for many seems to be, do you want that to be simply an illusion to make you feel dominant or submissive, or do you want the reality and all that entails? (not you in particular Michael). Example: I want to dominate you as long as you are feeling warm fuzzies and will still love me and stay with me. Or....I want to submit to you as long as I am feeling warm fuzzies and all loved and stuff, reserving the right to change my mind on whim, about what that is. I don't think any one way is better. Whatever floats any one person's boat. I just want to see clear communication as to what that person's way is. If they think they want to serve me, but on their terms, after I've explained clearly it will be "my way" then they will hit the highway. My way, isn't conditional to all their warm fuzzies and moods. If I did that, I would be compromising my own integrity and nature. I've done enough of that in my life. I think there is a certain level of manipulation to all of that. All of that being said, I also believe there needs to be some flexibility in any given relationship. Regardless of type. I just don't think that flexibility should compromise the foundation that relationship was built on.
_____________________________
My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one! Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!
|