TreasureKY -> RE: My way or the highway? (3/26/2009 11:32:56 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LaTigresse quote:
ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael I wanted to add that part of what fueled this for me is that the whole bit with "my way or the highway" is that where is the skill in that? Where is the dominance? Where is the molding/shaping/guidance in that? I just wanted to address the part I bolded. Two things that I see often twisted around and overly romanticised. The skill aspect. Assuming we are discussing relationships and not whipping techniques, skill is, in my mind, not the best word to use. Or if so, take it out of context as being only a dominant skill. ALL people need good relationship skills, not just the dominant party in a relationship. We figuratively beat people over the head with this concept, on the forums, all the time. Phrases like "The common denominator is you!!" etc.. As for "where is the dominance" well, it doesn't take a skilled rocket scientist to have a dominant personality. Hell, I've got a 12# canine that is more dominant than most people I know. No skill in that, she just is, it is her personality. Now, being a sucessful leader in a relationship, especially a power exchange relationship, is going to take a combination of things. Good relationship skills, mastery of self, maturity, and a dominant personality.....to make it work. While the phrase "my way or the highway" may be used negatively by many, may have a negative feel about it to many, it really is a concept that is the foundation of a power exchange relationship. It simply takes a lot of mature communication to discover what those "ways" are and whether or not they are compatible. What I see as being a bad thing, is constantly making "my way" too fluid. Too dependant upon keeping the other person, keep them happy, just so they don't "hit the highway". We are all drawn to a power exchange relationship, whatever it is to us, for a reason. The question for many seems to be, do you want that to be simply an illusion to make you feel dominant or submissive, or do you want the reality and all that entails? (not you in particular Michael). Example: I want to dominate you as long as you are feeling warm fuzzies and will still love me and stay with me. Or....I want to submit to you as long as I am feeling warm fuzzies and all loved and stuff, reserving the right to change my mind on whim, about what that is. I don't think any one way is better. Whatever floats any one person's boat. I just want to see clear communication as to what that person's way is. If they think they want to serve me, but on their terms, after I've explained clearly it will be "my way" then they will hit the highway. My way, isn't conditional to all their warm fuzzies and moods. If I did that, I would be compromising my own integrity and nature. I've done enough of that in my life. I think there is a certain level of manipulation to all of that. All of that being said, I also believe there needs to be some flexibility in any given relationship. Regardless of type. I just don't think that flexibility should compromise the foundation that relationship was built on. Excellent, excellent post, LAT. For me, your emphasis on leadership and not particularly "dominance" resonates with mine and Firm's relationship... though I do recognize that others live their lives differently. There have been many great points made in this thread on all sides, but I think for every person there is a different truth. For myself as a submissive, I claim a softer version of "it's my way or the highway"... though I'd never frame it in those specific terms. Ultimately, if Firm did not meet my idea of a partner, he wouldn't hold that position. Most assuredly, the same goes for him. He doesn't force me to comply with his wishes by using "it's my way or the highway" as a threat... even though the agreement we had going into this relationship is that he's the boss and gets to make the decisions. In the same vein, I do not hold it over his head that if he began to consistently fail to meet my needs that the highway option would most certainly be employed. Threats and ultimatums just don't work for us, but truthfully, we all have a breaking point where things just stop working for us. Who would want to be stuck in a relationship where you couldn't call it quits? We each get to decide what works for us and when it stops working. Firm doesn't inspire my submission any more than I inspire his dominance. Although, if he weren't the person that he is, I wouldn't be inspired to follow his lead... just as I would bet he wouldn't be the least bit inspired to lead me if I didn't have an agreeably compliant nature. So yeah... dominant and submissive are natural characteristics of ours that exist regardless of who we are with... but the choice to fit those two characteristics together as the centerpiece of our relationship was wholly made based on skills and compatibility... and our mutual desire to be flexible. Flexibility allows us to put it all to the side if we wish and just enjoy being compatible even during disagreements... without having to resort to the highway.
|
|
|
|