Andalusite -> RE: Young subs and old ugly men (3/29/2009 3:15:15 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact I would contend that for those who seek something in particular from a play only situation (not a dynamic or relationship) compatibility isn't always a necessary ingredient. <snipped> There is a beauty in rope work. Done to what appears to be perfection, the art is fantastic. If the intricacy of the work is your thrill, would you settle for the inexperienced who's best ties are on his shoes? Rather, would you want the rope laid upon your skin, in lovely design, that makes your heart soar? Could your soul still sing with sloppy, inexperienced work that was only a disappointment of your hopes and expectations? Oh, I understand what you mean, now! For me, I can be in an LTR with someone who is top or bottom, without any D/s, so I didn't realise you specifically meant casual play. I'm not currently looking for that, but a few years ago, when I was single, I did get to explore a few things like that. Most of my partners were men around my age, who were potential relationship partners, but I sometimes specifically chose someone who I felt was likely to *stay* casual, such as women, poly couples, or older men. I could potentially be attracted to people in one of those categories, but it's less likely, and I felt I was less likely to be tempted into it getting more sexual than I wanted it to than with someone who I was actively attracted to and viewed as a date. I'm not as focused on it with rope bondage in general, but certainly suspensions, knifeplay, fireplay, singletails, etc. require competence and experience, regardless of age.
|
|
|
|