HandSolo
Posts: 323
Joined: 11/22/2007 Status: offline
|
Not aimed at the OP: If you don't have anything to contribute to the debate, you can always cook up crooked statistics, and get cheap headlines to generate misdirected outrage! Buried in the article: "In addition, 4 per cent of the therapists and psychiatrists questioned said they would be prepared to try to change a patient's sexuality if asked." So fewer than 1 in 20 would try to "cure" homosexuality. Where does the 1 in 6 come from? Why, surprise, surprise, there's no clear explanation! So if a therapist currently in his 60's gave a whirl at "curing" somebody who felt their attractions were inappropriate, in, say 1975, was polled, and admitted he did so, he's the 1 in 6? What does that have to do with the consensus among therapists on the "treatability" of homosexuality? Compare the actual figures in the article to the quote from "lead researcher" Professor Michael King, from University College London: "...it is surprising that a significant minority of practitioners still offer this help to their clients." 4% is a significant minority? Bull. He has deliberately rolled the larger number of therapists who have tried to talk someone out of their sexual identity with those are currently willing to do so. Mark Twain: "There are lies, damned lies, and statistics."
_____________________________
I plan on leaving this world the way I came in: naked, screaming and by accident.
|