marie2 -> RE: Reality or fantasy? (4/2/2009 9:51:45 AM)
|
I think our desires to experience these types of relationship in our lives (to whatever degree) is "real". I think entering into these power exchange relationships and living in that dynamic can and does cause feelings in us that are genuine and necessary to our individual fulfillment, for example, passion, intimacy, intensity, discovery, love, emotionally bonding, etc etc. All of those feelings are authentic and are created by the dynamic that we are interacting within. The relationship is real, it's authentic, it's genuine. However, I do not believe it is one of genuine slavery, mastery or human ownership. I believe that those who say they are in master/slave relationships are really in master/slave simulation relationships. This is not to say that the power exchange isn't actually there, or that the dominance and submission isn't actually there etc. It's just to say that I don't think what we do is slavery. Maybe it just comes down to definitions? I don't know. For me, "Master slave" has always felt silly, and analagous to "cowboys and indians", or "cops and robbers"; those games we played as kids when we went into character to enjoy a fantasy. I think these power exchange relationships need words in order to create understanding and effective communication between us, but I don't think there is a need for a particular shroud, especially not "Master slave". I think people (generic bdsmers) would likely stop questioning their realness and trueness if they just dropped the need to call it pointed things like "slavery" and "ownership", and whatnot.
|
|
|
|