marie2
Posts: 1690
Joined: 11/4/2008 From: Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cpK69 quote:
ORIGINAL: marie2 quote:
Acts are more than just "acts" they creat a feeling and put you in an emotional place. Like humilitaiton, that is far from being just an act. Yup. Gotta agree strongly with this. If my dom said to me tomorrow, hey marie, it's my will that you be the dominant in our relationship now, I guess he is still in control, in a technical sense. And if I obey his command to be dominant towards him, I guess I'm still being submissive by obeying, even though I'm dominating him now. What came first, the chicken or the egg? Is it not true, in order to be the dominant, one must assert their will on to another? If so, I am confused how a sub can still be the sub, once they start asserting their will. Kim If he says "Top me", "Spank me" or "Dominate me", it's still his order, and I'm still obeying him whether it's to top him sexually, or dominate what he's going to eat and wear today. He still told me to do it and I'm still obeying because he wants to feel it, or try it, or headfuck me, or whatever. Who is in control in that scenerio? It all depends on how you tilt the diamond. Can we say as a fact that taking a spanking or giving a spanking is a submissive or dominant act? It depends on how the parties associate that particular act. Of course we each see certain actions as dominant or submissive. If we didn't, we'd be in vanilla relationships where everything is on equal footing. We are doing something different in ds relationships. One party is being submissive and one is being dominant, so obviously certain acts must be defining that status for us. But what we could never all agree upon is what actions specifically are dominant or submissive. To each his own in the sense that we all process or associate different actions/behaviors/acts/mindsets as dominant or submissive.
|