catize -> RE: Hard Limits (4/19/2009 9:43:25 AM)
|
quote:
Now this concerns a situation where you have initially discussed desires and needs and then later on a Master wants you to do something that you know will cause you harm either mentally or physically. There are several things about hard limits discussions that frustrate me a great deal. My hard limits are mine. It doesn’t matter that my dominant has some of the same hard limits. They were mine before I met him, and they will still be mine if he is no longer in my life. It’s all well and good to talk about trust that the dominant will not cause me harm; but I feel the dominant should trust me; trust that I am able to define harm for myself. Trust that I have valid reasons for those hard limits and I’m not just making it up to avoid things. Trust that when I say “I can’t” it doesn’t mean “I won’t” or “I don’t wanna.” It really means that I cannot do it. A dominant can have any damn limit he/she wants. That’s the nature of D/s. But a discussion of a dominant’s limits goes like this: D. :I don’t do X.” s. “OK” <scratches it off the list of possible fun stuff we’re gonna do.> On the other hand, a discussion about a submissive’s hard limits goes on and on; explanations, painful revelations which may not even have an impact on the dominant’s final decision, the knowledge that the dominant may bring it up again in the future, ‘revisit’ the option to see if that limit has changed, or to see if I have “grown” in my submission. It is my opinion, based on past experience, that pushing hard limits has little to do with my well-being and has a lot to do with the dominant wanting it all at any cost. (The above is a strongly held opinion, and as always YMMV)
|
|
|
|