RCdc -> RE: Israel is a racist state, says Iranian president (4/30/2009 11:09:00 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Termyn8or D&TD, I am ready to drop it. I found it very interesting but others do not. We are wrecking too many threads about this. The fact is I don't care if it was typed out at random, like the so many monkeys typing Shakespeare thing. I have apologized and called for a truce, we cannot debate this here. Also, the issue is not really all that important. T I'm not really debating the book itself Term. It's more in the context of truth and giving credit where it's due. The thing is Term, is that you found it interesting, but wouldn't you rather read the original words in it's original context, rather than a book that plagerised? Forget the book itself and all that it's about for the moment, but focus on the fact that it was a plagerisation of other text, so surely your interest should be focused on the original author and book and the context it is in(satire), instead of a lie? It wasn't random, it was plagerised. It's important because it was originally fiction, not fact. Satire, not serious. It's a whole different ball game. You asked - quote:
If you could prove to me that the Protocols are less valid than say the book of Revelations somehow, The answer is there in the original text of the original book, if you really want that answer. I understand you called a truce, and I am not really bothered about the context of the book itself, rather the issue of plagerism and more importantly - the context. That makes something like the statement made in the OP directly linked. the.dark.
|
|
|
|