CatdeMedici
Posts: 2257
Joined: 10/20/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: QuixoticErrant I am not blaming BDSM. I am saying it adds another level of complication. OK? I am going to dance on the saber here----yes for SOME it does add a level of complexity that many of us can't empathize with. I have a submissive friend who for 3 years twisted herself 7 ways to Sunday over some of these every issues, only to realize she had to stand on her values and beliefs and she walked away. It appears he thinks by being the Dominant, he can domineer his way to get her acquiescence--her needs, wants, desires around this extend much deeper --well beyond any D/s---my question now as I dance on the other side--did she not think it might come to this? Did she not listen to that nagging voice in the seconds between the darkness and the dawn that said, "what if?" and I am not talking Master sub, I am talking two people who have or are developing some kind of emotional attachment that could lead to the vanilla institution of marriage. And were there not signs about other things that may have given a clue? If she is talking to you, I am going to bet its because on certain things, he refuses to listen. IMHO a Dominant does not have the right to demand someone give up core values for the sake of D/s, a Dominant needs to understand the submissive, their drivers and be big enough to deal with them OR both parties need to part ways. Conversely, submission does not equate to asphalt, at the end of the day, there is a person in there with wants, need, desires, beliefs and they have to do one of two things: acquiesce or stand their ground. No one here can tell her which way is right, only she knows.
_____________________________
I am the Cat, holder of the whip and chair. "Let's see-whips, dips, chains, chips, yep sounds like a party to Me!"
|