Interesdom
Posts: 197
Joined: 5/24/2004 From: England Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: spittlelick Any members of RL Real slavery, it is so ideal, Real slavery is what it is all about, agree? No, I can not agree that Real slavery is what is is all about. Not on this site, I can't. CollarMe is a broad and generic BDSM website, probably the widest used and most comprehensive free BDSM site in the world. So I can't agree that any one specific way is what "it is all about" for a non-specific forum here. I have some views of slavery that many here would take to be extreme and as this thread shows, I am not alone in that. However, RLSlavery does go a bit overboard into fantasy in what the (apparently sole) owner says is slavery. - I have heard from US lawyers that there are rights that cannot be disabled.
- Defining a slave as 'a piece of (movable) personal property (a.k.a. "chattel") owned by another person' is pathetic. A slave - in the meaning of this site or that one - is a person; if something is personal property then it is owned so need not be repeated. 'A person owned by another person' would be quite sufficient.
- 'a slave can also just as easily be misused and abused' is obviously true but so what? It is obviously true. It is also just as obviously true - of historic, non-consensual slaves just as much as consensual slaves - that misusing and abusing a slave too much means that the slave will run away.
- Then it gets worse: 'Slavery is about control: the utter and total domination and control over another human being's life,' yet also on the site: 'If your Owner decided to ... ignore you completely you would accept ... That is what 'real' slaves do.' In that latter case, slavery need not be about control, domination or anything at all! Let's face it, slavery is about ownership, which might or might not be total domination or total control.
- And while I personally largely agree with this: 'Slavery is also about responsibility: the utter and total responsibility of another human being's life,' it does not gel with the idea that an owner could be a lazy slob who does nothing.
I have no problem with consensual slavery being as deep as the law will allow. I have no problem with somone running their own website about their own, narrow, view of slavery. I do wish that they were a bit more sensible and thoughtful. I do think that if people take this site too seriously, either owner or slave, they could find themselves seriously hurt and in serious trouble.
|