Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Argh!!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Argh!! Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Argh!! - 5/6/2009 11:37:27 PM   
GYPZYQUEEN


Posts: 730
Joined: 4/14/2009
Status: offline
BI the way...
BI-sexuality is sexual behavior with or physical attraction to both genders.
SO then a virgin nun who will never have sex or kiss a wo/man could still be bi (** pls  no nun jokes)

In a 600 page paper VICE VERSA ..GARBER states that

 we would all be bi 

if it were not for "repression,religion,repugnance,denial and premature specialization"
Edward De Bono writes about the same
 
I AGREE

There is
sexual attraction..emotional attraction..and affectional attraction...you can have 1 2 or all with someone.Personal or social identity can be based on those attractions and HOW they are expressed by the person

Sexual orientation falls along a continuim over a lifetime..so one does not have to be exclusively hetero or homosexual but can feel varying degrees of both.
Heteros who engage in occasional homosexual activity could be considered bi but may not identify as such but as hetero..some who engage in bi may not identify as such...

I do agree with others here that we are seeing  KOOL trendy trend
bull shit around bi...especially girl on girl as a preformance/pleasing men

what next? 
*missionary will be the new anal?
*bush will be the new shaved?

GQ

bi for now........

< Message edited by GYPZYQUEEN -- 5/6/2009 11:40:20 PM >

(in reply to Jeptha)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 12:26:13 AM   
YoursMistress


Posts: 894
Joined: 12/17/2008
Status: offline
I second Miss GQ's motion. 

yours


_____________________________

May your service of love a beautiful thing; want nothing else, fear nothing else and let love be free to become what love truly is. -- Hadewijch of Antwerp

As a rule, I don't like to make general statements.

(in reply to GYPZYQUEEN)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 12:51:39 AM   
NihilusZero


Posts: 4036
Joined: 9/10/2008
From: Nashville, TN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: missturbation

'I kissed a girl and i liked it, the taste of her cherry chap stick'............but i'm not bi

I can't stand that song.

Maybe the purist in me is just pissed because Jill Sobule did it first and did it better.


_____________________________

"I know it's all a game
I know they're all insane
I know it's all in vain
I know that I'm to blame."
~Siouxsie & the Banshees


NihilusZero.com

CM Sex God du Jour
CM Hall Monitor

(in reply to missturbation)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 12:54:17 AM   
LadySweetOrSour


Posts: 1415
Joined: 3/21/2009
Status: offline
I just don't like cherry chapstick. Quite frankly, I don't want to kiss anyone wearing chapstick. Or vicks vaporub.

(in reply to NihilusZero)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 1:16:56 AM   
UglyTruth


Posts: 126
Joined: 7/14/2008
Status: offline
Sorry, I have to disagree with the OP and GYPZYQUEEN, although I'm closer to agreeing with GQ.

And I'd add that I don't find men attractive. Just penis.

(in reply to LadySweetOrSour)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 2:48:40 AM   
HalloweenWhite


Posts: 1028
Joined: 6/20/2005
Status: offline
It may have been that this person thought they were bi, or didn't know and wanted to find out, maybe they just liked they idea and wanted to try it, then discovered they weren't bi at all.Maybe, like IronBear said there should be a "bi-curious" option, but there again what's wrong with just talking?, where does it end? a list of favourite colours? lol. (No offence IronBear, just using that as an example).

You shouldn't assume people will follow through with anything they say just because they say it. You were et down-this time, so try again....and again....and again until you find what you're looking for. Or something close.

(in reply to darkclouds)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 4:21:16 AM   
RCdc


Posts: 8674
Status: offline
Your idea is flawed because by your premise then experience is the only indicator of sexual preference and that just isn't true.
 
I do not agree that bi-curious should be an option either.  Otherwise you should also have slave-curious, dominant-curious, switch-curious... the list would just go on and on.
 
the.dark.

_____________________________


RC&dc


love isnt gazing into each others eyes - it's looking forward in the same direction

(in reply to darkclouds)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 5:28:15 AM   
MissJanice2


Posts: 178
Joined: 3/4/2009
Status: offline
Label attack again.   We all don' t fit into the little box.
 
Best Wishes,
 
Mistress_Jan

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 5:36:34 AM   
tiinkerbell


Posts: 96
Status: offline
quote:

However, I will say I knew I was bi long before I kissed my first woman. You can know which genders you are attracted too sexual prior to having contact.

This is something that I would have to agree with. I was in 8th grade when I discovered my liking for ladies;there was no being 'curious' about it. Yet, it was only less than a year ago that I had my first relationship with a woman.

Allison


_____________________________

Allison

- Some People walk in the rain; others just get wet -
Roger Miller

(in reply to LovingMistress45)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 5:41:48 AM   
MissJanice2


Posts: 178
Joined: 3/4/2009
Status: offline
Well,
 
This term bi-curious has always confused me.   I am basically straight; however, there are moments when I find myself looking at women, and them looking at me.
My slave swears I am a lesbian.  It scares me to death.
The one who said that if there were no religion or certain orders to keep us "rounded", we would have a lot more freedom to search these feelings.

The new generation is very lucky to be able to experience things that my generation had to keep locked inside.
 
Best Wishes,
 
Mistress_Jan

(in reply to LadySweetOrSour)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 5:49:05 AM   
SailingBum


Posts: 3225
Joined: 12/10/2007
From: Sailin the stormy sea
Status: offline
what the hell is going on here?????  I thought EVERYONE likes a VIRGIN sheesh ... send all those virgin bitches over my way....Ill teach em the error of their ways.

BadOne


_____________________________

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

According to SwithNSpanky
We are all so very lucky to have you with us to impart your great wisdom.

(in reply to Jeptha)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 5:59:16 AM   
breatheasone


Posts: 4004
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
LOL ok well without beating the meaning of any one word to death, i wouldn't mind a bi-curious option. If only to show that someone is open to that, without having to claim it as a full time lifestyle preference. 

_____________________________

Romans 10:13,For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Mike posts in black font
candy posts in pink font

(in reply to SailingBum)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 6:02:17 AM   
GoddessTeaze


Posts: 1125
Joined: 10/14/2006
From: The Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SailingBum

what the hell is going on here?????  I thought EVERYONE likes a VIRGIN sheesh ... send all those virgin bitches over my way....Ill teach em the error of their ways.

BadOne



I'm on My way *EG*



GoddezzT`


_____________________________

~* The only disability in life is a bad attitude. ~Scott Hamilton*~

~*Beauty is not in the face; beauty is a light in the heart. ~Kahlil Gibran*~

(in reply to SailingBum)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 6:06:20 AM   
oceanwinds


Posts: 530
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MissJanice2

Well,
 
This term bi-curious has always confused me.   I am basically straight; however, there are moments when I find myself looking at women, and them looking at me.
My slave swears I am a lesbian.  It scares me to death.
The one who said that if there were no religion or certain orders to keep us "rounded", we would have a lot more freedom to search these feelings.

The new generation is very lucky to be able to experience things that my generation had to keep locked inside.
 
Best Wishes,
 
Mistress_Jan


The female form has always captured my eye, but I know that I am not a lesbian nor really bi-sexual. Maybe just the artist eye in me that finds the female form more captivating.

_____________________________

I know where I came from and where I am today. I am forever grateful to all that touched my life. Thank you all and especially you, Goddess.

(in reply to MissJanice2)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 6:20:40 AM   
YoursMistress


Posts: 894
Joined: 12/17/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark

Your idea is flawed because by your premise then experience is the only indicator of sexual preference and that just isn't true.
 
I do not agree that bi-curious should be an option either.  Otherwise you should also have slave-curious, dominant-curious, switch-curious... the list would just go on and on.
 
the.dark.


Sigh.  I continue to be exasperated by the notion that there are a fixed and finite number of subsets of sexuality that are important to maintain and that everyone must be identified and categorized into one. Even if I am heterosexual, it doesn't mean that I will be attracted to anyone else who also identifies themselves as hetero.  If it is so darned important to categorize people, wouldn't it be easier to do so given more categories? 

The hardest thing for me is to get why it is important for someone who isn't gay, bi or God forbid, bi-curious to determine that anyone else in the world oughtn't to claim to be in one or another category.  For all you know, the person who claims to be hetero dreams of nothing but dicks all night, and the one who claims to be gay is doing so strictly to seem trendy. 

I won't disagree that having broad categories (straight, gay, bi, dominant, submissive, switch) makes it easy to organize a website so that people can more quickly narrow their searches and raise their chances of finding compatible people or pertinent information with higher probability.  However, when it comes to how individuals identify themselves, whether they want to call themselves bi-curious, 50% gay, demi-gay, in a g
ray area, gayish, bi-ish, or whatever, who's bloody business is it really? 

yours



< Message edited by YoursMistress -- 5/7/2009 6:21:35 AM >


_____________________________

May your service of love a beautiful thing; want nothing else, fear nothing else and let love be free to become what love truly is. -- Hadewijch of Antwerp

As a rule, I don't like to make general statements.

(in reply to RCdc)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 6:25:25 AM   
IrishMist


Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:

However, when it comes to how individuals identify themselves, whether they want to call themselves bi-curious, 50% gay, demi-gay, in a gray area, gayish, bi-ish, or whatever, who's bloody business is it really?


Dayum straight Ma'am

_____________________________

If I said something to offend you, please tell me what it was so that I can say it again later.


(in reply to YoursMistress)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 6:31:36 AM   
SunNMoon


Posts: 1058
Joined: 3/18/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomImus

quote:

ORIGINAL: darkclouds
I am sick of all the profiles searching for a third cause the sub has suddenly decided she is Bi, and yet she has no experience with another woman.


I clearly declared myself heterosexual before I had any experience with a woman (or girl - as the case may be). Most of us were aware of our sexuality or sexual orientation before we became sexually active. Please feel free to explain the difference to me.



I so very much agree with DomImus. Really when does one get to have a sexual orientation?

_____________________________

"We agreed to S&M only, sex and mockery." - Gray’s Anatomy.

(in reply to DomImus)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 6:41:51 AM   
breatheasone


Posts: 4004
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
i think the OP started out just maybe commenting that its probably a tad frustrating to think you are getting someone experienced, and at ease with being "bi-sexual", only to find that you have someone thats hesitant, or ill at ease, and that can be a little disappointing when its not what you were expecting.

_____________________________

Romans 10:13,For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Mike posts in black font
candy posts in pink font

(in reply to SunNMoon)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 6:50:22 AM   
OmegaG


Posts: 1474
Joined: 10/23/2007
Status: offline
I could have sworn it was here but maybe it was somewhere else that there was a bi-curious option, it doesn't solve any problems.  I'd have people contact me that wanted a woman that was willing to be with women but weren't into women.  When I told them that I definately like woman almost as much as I like men but had never had the chance to be with a woman, I was yelled at for misrepresenting myself and that I should clearly state tha I am bi.

You can't please everyone all the time.

_____________________________


Regret for the things we did can be tempered by time; it is regret for the things we did not do that is inconsolable. Sydney J. Harris

Sex without pain is like food without taste.
- de Sade

(in reply to breatheasone)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Argh!! - 5/7/2009 7:45:09 AM   
SailingBum


Posts: 3225
Joined: 12/10/2007
From: Sailin the stormy sea
Status: offline
Goddess You HAVE got to stop teasing me ... my heart can't take it... 

I did have to laff at the post that said there somehow is a dif bet a "exp bisexual and a virgin bisexual"....  WTF over???  Were I to swing dat way.  Doing the nasty whether boy or girl not any dif, cept one has a extra orfice for me to pound into to.....

Note to self NO bald men...  gotta have a hand hold

BadOne


_____________________________

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

According to SwithNSpanky
We are all so very lucky to have you with us to impart your great wisdom.

(in reply to OmegaG)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Argh!! Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125