ExKat
Posts: 300
Joined: 8/25/2008 Status: offline
|
I vote no for bi-curious as a label...I've always disdained "curious" as a label most anything apart from babies or cats. It's true that many women on here are not hardcore bisexuals. However, by very definition, bisexual means a little of both. Many of the women that I've run into on here and in real life who define themselves as bi are about 75% into men/25% into women. And that's okay. The fact that I like men more doesn't make me only curious about women...I've been with women and it definitely has it's charms. Of course, partners should share their level of experience before they meet, but I don't think that needs to be part of the label. Should we have a listing of the exact amount of sexual experience someone has had next to their label? Seems like there are lots of more annoying things about CM to rant about. ~Katie, who considered herself bisexual long, long before she ever put on that cherry chapstick
_____________________________
~*~ The amalgam of Exquemelin and Katie978~*~ In the forums, it'll usually be Katie you're speaking to. testing "That's the plan/ Rule the world/ You and me/ Anyday ::wink::"
|