CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: oceanwinds Do you see an s-type as a reflection of their Dom, and why or why not? oceanwynds Yes, I do, in the same way that I see the behaviors of any subordinate individual in any way of life as being reflective of the culture in which xhe works or is under management. If a subordinate individual is -not- a reflection of the dominant force in hir life, then what is xhe suborning hirself too? If someone claims to be yielding to me, I would expect that hir actions would reflect my expectations of hir, both in and out of my presence. I also have to clarify that, for me, this question is the fundamental difference of bottom vs. servant. A bottom is hir own person, and hir actions have no reflection on the tops that xhe interacts with. Xhe keeps hir own life, and retains autonomy aside from the period of a scene. A -servant-, to me, moves into that realm where, to a greater or lesser extent, xhe becomes a reflection of hir status as a 'kept individual'. The fact that xhe was chosen to be kept, and the rituals and expressions that mark hir as having been claimed by hir keeper present the picture of someone who willingly subsumes hir own spot as the 'sun' in hir own universe to a place where xhe becomes a 'moon', reflecting the image of the house or keeper whom xhe serves. Dame Calla
< Message edited by CallaFirestormBW -- 5/26/2009 1:00:17 PM >
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|