LafayetteLady
Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007 From: Northern New Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact I read through to the fourth page, and then I couldn't take it anymore. At the moment, I'm right there with you. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact If I had the same, or even secondary rights regarding clip as his wife does, I'd be thrilled. From a legal standpoint, I don't even have the right to be notified if he's killed in action. That's right. That's even less than what most people, regardless of their sexual orientation have. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact Unlike same sex couples, My company doesn't recognize My poly family for bereavement benefits. If clip were to be killed in action, I have no right to time off. I have no say in removing life support if his body is being kept alive, even though his brain might be dead. I have no right to his personal effects, nor the flag that would cover his coffin should he be killed during duty. Not really, a spouse is considered next of kin. If clip were your brother and he had a wife, you wouldn't receive DIRECT notification either. If clip were your CHILD and was married, you wouldn't have the choice about removing him from life support, you wouldn't get the flag. There is only one flag, so who would you say is entitled to it in a poly family? With life support, the immediate next of kin is given the weight of deciding life support unless there is an advance directive. You aren't entitled to time off from work if your grandparent were to die either. LadyPact, I agree that there are many types of civil unions that might need some recognition. But let's just look at the situation a bit differently. If and and clip were a heterosexual couple is simply living together, and has made the choice not to marry, you would not be entitled to a single thing mentioned above either. Your company would not be required to give you time off should he die, you aren't entitled to the flag, etc. I am by no means attempting to diminsh your family relationships, but given only one flag, why do you believe YOU would be entitled over his wife? It would seem he has at least two important relationships, why should you be put ahead of the other? Again, I don't mean anything against your relationship, or any poly families. You could be the spouse (gay or straight) and still not have the right to decide on life support, as it can be given to someone else. In any case, progress takes place slowly. At one point in time, blacks and whites were not permitted by law to marry. Now they are. One step at a time. Have you or other poly families ever attempted to figure out how to rectify the situation or attempt to create your own proposition to resolve your issue? Gay marriage is getting the attention, the proposition, etc. because gays are fighting for it. Certainly, one on one relationships are much easier to "divide" and make some of the decisions you mention above. There are also healthcare (primary, secondary, teriary, etc.), family leave, support should one of the relationships end and who is responsible, etc. I would be very interested in seeing how those issues would be resolved, and would support an argument for you to have the rights that you seek, but resolutions for those types of issues would have to be spelled out for you to even get footing in getting that right. In the situation of gay marriage, all current marriage and divorce laws would easily apply without the need for adjustment. While I would support the idea of you getting the rights that you seek, I don't think that mainstream society is quite ready for that yet. Look how long it has taken the gay community to get a foothold. Believe it or not, Lindsey, you're not exactly on the bottom of the totem pole. There are many poly families on these boards that don't even have the things you are turning your nose up at and you have no gratitude for. You are so angry that all you can do is talk. Sometimes, you should listen.
|