Andalusite
Posts: 2492
Joined: 1/25/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jeptha "...Domination is the word I use in the context of BDSM to describe that feeling of the other person's will being surrendered to me...." Maybe the end result is the same; but one view seems to see the action as hinging upon an act of the dominant (imposing their will) , the other view chooses as its subject the decision made by the submissive to submit. It may seem the same in the end, but I think there's actually a big difference in there somewhere. I don't feel so much as though I'm imposing my will as that I'm encouraging someone else to exercise their own free will... (while also doing the same myself, of course) Hmm, to me, it's actually both people making that decision/interaction, and it's more inspired by them, or a reaction to them, than a conscious act of will. I'm completely neutral toward almost everyone in terms of D/s, and all but 3 of my relationships since I was 20 were egalitarian kinky - no overt D/s, though they tended to cater to me regardless of what we did in the bedroom. I tend to feel dominant toward someone who *acts* in a submissive fashion (body language, doing what I tell them to do or little service-oriented things, reacting in yummy ways when I do hurty or controlling things to them). However, just topping them isn't enough for me to consider it to be Domination, and ordering them to do housework/etc. wouldn't do anything for me, absent a pre-existing relationship. Some people just push my Dominant buttons, and while there are things I can point to that are elements, a lot of it is subconscious, pheremones, the way they breathe, the way they smell, their expression. I'm currently in a M/s relationship, and I similarly needed my Master to draw those reactions and feelings from me, before I could submit to him. We did discuss his expectations in abstract first, what he wanted me to do, what he felt was essential vs. optional, how it would apply to our relationship/interaction/daily lives, especially since we aren't living together. However, no matter how great he was at Topping me, or how much I philosophically agreed with him about D/s, or how intelligent/honorable he is, I couldn't have submitted to him unless he encouraged that side of my nature. On both sides, I don't see free will as being involved in the D/s inspiration part, but in the "choosing to act upon/follow through with it" part. I've reacted submissively toward two men in the past, but neither offered the kind of relationship I needed. So, I chose not to be *their* submissive, and to not pursue D/s, or a emotional/romantic/sexual relationship with either of them at all. When I was looking for a partner, things like being physically strong enough to pick me up, help me practice my gymnastics moves, making me feel safe/protected when we're out in public around other people, being honorable, caring, patient, sociable with my friends, interesting to talk to, low-drama/self controlled, intelligent, having sexual chemistry with me, etc. matter to me regardless of the D/s or BDSM dynamic. They are equally important in a bottom, a Dominant, a switch, or a vanilla guy who is openminded about trying BDSM but has no idea yet what he'll like.
< Message edited by Andalusite -- 6/14/2009 12:52:01 PM >
|