CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
Original: catize Does the one who owns you not submit to the laws, to the government? Does he have any authority to make the person driving in front of him move out of his way? Does he have the influence to tell people at work how to live their private lives? If he is stopped for speeding does he have the power to tell the cop not to give him a ticket? I consider this to be a spurious argument. Of course, one aspect of living in community is a requirement to abide by its laws. However, as one in dominion, it is -also- my place to evaluate the laws of the land and the government under which I abide, and to determine whether the laws or actions of those governing bodies is supportive of my ethical framework and the health and well being of my family. If not, it is up to -me- to find a way to bring my family and the laws of the land/government into synchrony (including, if necessary, removing my household to a place where the laws and governmental behavior is more ethically compatible to the framework by which I and those I am responsible for abide). If I am disobeying the laws, it is the mark of one with self dominion to accept censure for what one has done wrong. That is a mark of responsibility for one's actions. It doesn't mean that one will never step off-course, but that one in dominion accepts responsibility for restoring balance when such a thing has happened. If I were speeding and pulled over, I would accept a ticket, not as evidence of police dominion over me, but as the responsible repercussion of my behavior. If I did not agree with the reason for the ticket, I would not discuss it with the police officer. He is a subject of the PTB (powers that be), and, as such, it is senseless to argue the point with him... instead, I would deal with the matter in the courts of law, before my peers. Dominion over oneself and one's household also does not apply, in any relevant way, to controlling the behavior of others (co-workers, subordinates at work, etc.). As I am free, and in dominion of my own life, so, too, do I accept and respect that others have dominion over their own life and choices OR have abdicated that dominion to another individual by mutual consent. It is a senseless individual, dominant or not, who would attempt to steal the life from one who has not yielded up that decision process. Dominion does NOT mean bossing everyone around, nor does being dominant give one that right... OR responsibility -- and yet, being in a situation where one does not, in any given moment, have complete control of the situation also does not offset the dominion of an effective dominant, especially over the direction of one's life. Yes, it may be expedient, at a given time, to allow someone else to control a given situation, and doing so, when it is appropriate, also does not offset one's dominion over self or those one is responsible for -- in fact, it is, in my mind, a representation of one's responsibility and a point of wisdom, as one who holds dominion, to know when to let someone with greater knowledge or experience lead the way. The thing that marks the dominant in such situations isn't whether xhe bosses everyone around hir around... but whether, in the midst of an untenable situation, xhe completely capitualtes or, instead, seeks ways to turn the situation to hir benefit and the benefit of those whom xhe is responsible for (or get all of them out of the situation if there is no way to turn it to one's benefit). Dame Calla
< Message edited by CallaFirestormBW -- 6/21/2009 3:18:33 PM >
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|