CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jeptha Calla, I agree with your big picture assessment - but to be "dominant" don't you have to be dominant in relation to something? I -am- dominant in relation to something. In fact, I am dominant in relation to just about -everything-. Even in my job, where I have a boss, rather than just taking orders on how things must be, I created my own job title and duties -- a job in which my particular talents would be well-utilized, and my less-than-stellar qualities would not creep up to sabotage the organization. My boss -does- provide a doorway for leadership, but I am -always- proactive in how I approach issues that may come up. Usually, I am the first one to know I screwed up... so rather than waiting for the hammer to drop, I will go to my boss and say "Hey, I ran into an issue with this. I messed up here and here, and this is what I'm doing to fix it." I am dominant in relation to life, and to society. I move through the world within a map that I actively control. quote:
If I were to try to offer my own succinct answer to "what is it that dominants do", I would probably come up with something like "take responsibility for themselves", which I think is in the neighborhood of your idea. Yes, that pretty much is a good way to sum it up succinctly. As a word/description junkie, I just like to flesh it out and give it the substance of the descriptives. quote:
But - would that be something that dominants do, or just something that adults do? Not all adults take responsibility for themselves. Not very many adults actually want or need to chart their own course of life. Many adults are more than happy to let employers, family members, businesses, marketers, salespeople, neighbors, religious leaders, and other people decide for them how they will live, the work they will have to be satisfied with, the beliefs they will hold, and the causes they will support. Heck, it's been my experience that a majority of adults aren't even paying -attention- to their lives on a minimal level... and then they're shocked when suddenly, the bottom falls out and they have no idea how to put their lives back together. If my life goes off-course, I have a process in place to get it back on track. If it's knocked off by 1 degree or 180, I know what process I need to go through to get myself back to where I've mapped. If I screw up, I have a process to get me back on track... and I do my absolute best to get a picture of what's going on around me, since part of the process of dominion, on this level, includes "forewarned is forearmed". quote:
I love Padriag's answer because it is challenging to think about - and, because there are subs who are looking for a particular expression of dominance or another. And there is a difference in how dominants interpret and express it. I agree that Padriag's answer suits very well when discussing relations with others -- but I hold to my position that dominion is, first, an act of self-creation, and only on an ancillary level is it about how we -relate-. I would also agree that it is a particular bias of mine, and may be heavily related to the amount of time I've spent in monastic pursuits, where one's dominion is rarely over anything but oneself, and, perhaps, a blank manuscript page or the tomato worms in the garden. Warmly, Dame Calla
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|