RE: Dominant women (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


Dnomyar -> RE: Dominant women (6/20/2009 1:03:20 PM)

somoeone was insulting in the forum and I missed it. Dammm.




sweetsub1957 -> RE: Dominant women (6/20/2009 1:30:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sweetsub1957
Oh!  One last thing.....you forgot to capitalize "His" in your signature.  [;)]


quote:

ORIGINAL: VirginPotty

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

Oh don't come off all victim here!  You said things were final in many of your opinions.. such as.. end of story! This is the way it is!  It doesn't matter how you say that really... you let us know there was no changing your mind and that was the way it was, end of story.

You were not asking questions.  You had no humble to you.  You weren't even nice.  Don't play poor misunderstood victim now!


Well, at least she capitalized the H in her sig line so she DOES listen! [8D]


she did!  hahaha  someone listened to me!?  OMG!!  hahaha  Seriously though, she was so insulting to a whole group of People and so intolerant of Them and Their "kink," it was pathetic.  In doing so, she was reflecting terribly on herself and her Master, Who apparently hasn't taught her a thing about tolerance and respect for Oothers.....or at least she hasn't learned.  It's nice & all that, that she's come back on and said she presented her post in the wrong way, but it's already "out there" and has made it's impression.  i don't think Aanyone is falling for her "poor me" second post.

edited to add the "serious part."




Andalusite -> RE: Dominant women (6/20/2009 2:19:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: darkangel6989
That is biologically speaking though, not what the world/ society has taught women. the world has taught women that they must be strong, independent, that being sexually attractive to a male is slutty (in a bad way), that submitting to males is wrong… that males must not show who they really are sexually. Everything about females identifies that she is made to please men. The way her body is made weaker than a male. the way her face is shaped, breasts, the body shape, her ass….. just everything, the way she is made in every way. females are NOT made equal to Males and that is a fact. When you try to prove differently you are grasping at straws that society has taught you not what is actually true biologically and what is truly in female’s human nature. A female once finding her true nature and is bound will find true happiness and bliss that she will not find anywhere else, and if she loses her bindings she will chase after them forever. a Male however will always fight those binds and run fast away from them once freed. i hate when people fight their basic human structure. i will never understand women domination and i am not meant to understand it because it is not right. End of story you can try to prove me wrong but you will be sharing with me what society has taught you.

FR: I read through a few replies, but people have mostly just said "You're wrong" without explaining why.

Your Master is my height, and about 20 pounds heavier than I am. I could easily carry him piggyback, sweep him up in my arms and carry him across the room, etc. In raw strength, it would probably depend on which specific muscle groups - I'm *very* strong relative to my size and gender, but it's possible he might have an edge on upper body. In terms of unarmed combat, it would depend on a lot of factors: if he has any martial arts training, how seriously we were fighting (life and death vs. sparring), who had the advantage of surprise, etc. I'm very close to my own Master in strength, and have a lot more martial arts training than he does, though most of it has been breadth (whatever fit my schedule at university) rather than depth. He enjoys sparring/playfighting with me, and loves my power and athleticism in other ways, as well. I do gymnastics, so we do a lot of chin-ups, handstands, etc.

I started out as a Domme for about 5 years, when I was 20. After that, I was in egalitarian kinky relationships, including some bottoming, but not submission. In my last relationship, I was a submissive for 3 years, and I just became a slave a couple of weeks ago to my Master. However, gender or biological destiny had nothing to do with it - when I was looking this last time, and the previous time, I was just as open to finding a submissive man, a switch, a top, or a bottom. How I interact with someone depends on my feelings toward him, not because he is a man, and therefore is either superior or inferior to me.




Lockit -> RE: Dominant women (6/20/2009 2:36:24 PM)

It's kind of hard to train someone long distance and in a matter of a few weeks.  Not even someone so well versed in bdsm and d/s as the dominant was, with all that time he had invested in it all.

I just wonder how long hot air last's in a balloon and wonder if it lasts any longer in human beings... aside from dominant or submissive.  [sm=cute.gif] Passes out gas x and runs... [sm=couch.gif]




sweetsub1957 -> RE: Dominant women (6/20/2009 3:59:09 PM)

~Fast Reply~
Good one, Lockit!  [sm=applause.gif]




Lashra -> RE: Dominant women (6/20/2009 5:16:27 PM)

How do you know that men were not made to please women? Or perhaps to please each other? Your argument does not sound logical but is mere speculation. It is also a sweeping generalization.

I would say that YOU were made for pleasing men, that you are weaker and not equal to them. YOUR true nature is to be submissive to males and it would seem, combative and ill ease with those of the same gender just because we have different personalities. I have never been submissive and never will be. That is my nature and nature made me this way.

You can hate all you want but it will not change the fact that some women are Dominant, some are submissive and some are a mixture of both. Men do not flee from me, on the contrary I've never had a problem getting a man and he staying with me as long as our relationship worked for the two of us.

~Lashra




GreedyTop -> RE: Dominant women (6/20/2009 5:23:08 PM)

dont forget, Lashra.. that SOME women are vanilla...




DemonKia -> RE: Dominant women (6/20/2009 5:47:04 PM)

FR, after continuing read thru

lol . . . . This thread is still entertaining me so much . .. . . .

Okay, time for a little weird twist: the OP had pulled up the full profile for my bottom profile (laugh all you want, make fun, whatever, but I've tagged my bottom profile 'slave') . . . . . . So. Was she (a) looking at the 'competition'; (b) checking out how other slave-tagged profiles do their thing; (c) window shopping for a sister slave for her owner; (d) something else; or (e) some combo of the above? It was one of those 'strange small universe' moments to see her pic in the 'Viewed Full Profile' folder, gave me a good laugh . . . . .

ETA: I wonder if she realized that I was one of the big meanies refusing to dignify her drivel with serious replies to her OP . . . . . & if she did, I wonder what she thought / felt . . . . .




sunshinemiss -> RE: Dominant women (6/20/2009 6:05:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: darkangel6989
i hate when people fight their basic human structure.


As do I. I always admire people who accept their own limitations. So many times, we see people on these forums trying to make an impression on others by pretending to be much smarter than they really are. You have my respect for not trying to do that.



OM Gary...
I can't believe that!  I nearly spit soda all over the screen. 

I love you !!!




MoGa -> RE: Dominant women (6/22/2009 1:40:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Loki45

quote:

ORIGINAL: Asherdelampyr
Wow, I remember those chodes
damn that was a long time ago
wonder if that was were he learned to be a "Dominant"?
bet it is, that or the old Yahoo chat rooms


You're assuming he learned. Check the profile. The main text says he's the owner of the OP. The first and only journal entry says the 'search is never ending.'



Actually Loki45, the "the search IS never ending". If the search for knowledge and growth is what he meant by it. Unfortunately, unless he says otherwise (I haven't read all the responses yet) we can only assume what he meant when he wrote that line.

MoGa

Oh and on a side note: She capitalized His in her signature line now. Amazing..
 
..And also thanks goes to Asher for bringing this gem to my attention (What has made your eyes roll today?) I wouldn't have done a search on every thread I missed, while I was having a remarkable FUN weekend! *s*




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Dominant women (6/22/2009 3:25:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: darkangel6989
i hate when people fight their basic human structure.


As do I. I always admire people who accept their own limitations. So many times, we see people on these forums trying to make an impression on others by pretending to be much smarter than they really are. You have my respect for not trying to do that.



OM Gary...
I can't believe that!  I nearly spit soda all over the screen. 

I love you !!!


Why thank you, sincerely! But I'm not Gary... just so's you know, in case you run into the real Gary someday and he wonders what you're referring to...




sunshinemiss -> RE: Dominant women (6/22/2009 5:20:01 PM)

*fyi...

OMG = Oh My God, except here where it is Oh My Gary...

Ask red, she's like sitting next to Gary, mother of Gary, Gary of Bethlehem, PA... something.




RealSub58 -> RE: Dominant women (7/19/2009 8:46:40 AM)

  
quote:

ORIGINAL: onlyfreelycaged

let me put it this way for you darkangel...

You said that you wouldn't believe us even if we told you. You won't change how you fell about it because your not open to it,
First of all --  where did the OP say this?  She NEVER did.  That was YOUR  interpretation.  



so we had some fun instead of taking the time to answer the question.
Second of all   I have noticed over the last 5 years reading these message boards, poking fun and use of sarcasm if running rampant. 
So you (people in general) join the crowd instead of taking your own path.


if it looked like you were seeking to understand,
Thirdly,   What did she have to look like for people to understnd when she stated clearly her confusion and her opinion.

then you would have gotten a lot more thought in your answers.
Lastly,   I have learned that the older I get, the better I learn to ask a question.  When I don't know enough to even ask the correct question, it is gonna come out wrong.
 
So on all accounts...the young lady is jeered, spoken to very disrespectfully and sarcastically because someone could not take the time to clarify.  Assumption is always the MF of all solutions here on CM.





DesFIP -> RE: Dominant women (7/19/2009 9:59:01 AM)

Post 87, page five. Says she still believes what she said and nothing anybody else has said has made a difference.
Can't cite her profile since I didn't read it prior and I imagine she's changed it since.




Lockit -> RE: Dominant women (7/19/2009 10:14:06 AM)

Sometimes someone is just not ready to learn when they are full of the answers RealSub... so if you can do any better... go right ahead. Rather than focus on the ignorance go right to the source of the confusion and help her out! She wasn't willing to listen at the time. She may be growing now that her ever so wonderful dominant... who I do assume was the angry sort and filling her head with nonsense... is gone.  So bring it all up again will you?  You are no better trying to scold those you think need a scolding and bring this to light again.

I brought up her past posting style in her new thread, but she had a totally different way of handling things and might be growing. Let's jump on the bandwagon of a different route we all should go and then flash the past just as you have. You just had to point out how many were wrong, so much that you had to bring her into focus, the one you were defending. I never defended her, so I'm continuing about the same when I called her on it all... but she did respond in a different light so now I will say... she has shown some growth... she is getting that respect in another thread... and you have to point out the wrongs so much that you highlight her even more in your judgement and assumptions yourself.  Good work.




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 9 10 [11]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875