SteelofUtah
Posts: 5307
Joined: 10/2/2007 From: St George Utah Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: aLittleKitten I think the real issue (for ME, not for everyone) at the moment is TPE and what it entails. As a few people have explained to me in the past, TPE means that the Dom has all power and control to overrule anything the Sub says, safewords are meaningless and the Sub is unable to leave the relationship. I'm a little squeemish about this, just because of the type of person I am in my personal life. I'm quieter, more reserved, a little shy, I would say submissive, but on certain things I am fiercely independent, even just for the sake of being independent. That nature in me just doesn't jive with the idea of hard restrictions on my behaviour. Again you are focusing on what OTHERS say this is supposed to be, somehow you cane across this group of people who seem to agree and that is possible however I wish to make a simple statement that should put your mind at ease. Slavery as in implied legal ownership of a person is Illegal. You cannot be forced to stay and you cannot be locked into a situation that you do not want to be in. You say you do not want to be with someone who has this much control over your actions then simply find a Master who does not WANT that much control over your actions. Choose a Master who wants the same level of control that you are willing to give. Finding a match like this will seriously hinder your search and it may take some time to find a good match but at least it will be closer to what you are looking for and not someone who is going to require that you beg permission to use the toilet. quote:
ORIGINAL: aLittleKitten Now, let me tell a little story. When I first started fielding people for possible BDSM style play a year ago (read "play", I only intended for sessions and explicitly said this) someone who came across as knowledgeable and trustworthy (A Doctor, even) claimed to understand those limits and restrictions, and we had many conversations online and on the phone about this and he seemed incredibly understanding and accepting. He was older, and was very intelligent. Years of experience in the scene, many Subs before, yadda yadda. We never once brought up TPE or 24/7. To be honest, I didn't have much of an idea what it was at the time. So, we meet for the first time, neutral location, and we hit it off well enough, but we'd negotiated no play on the first meeting, or first several meetings. He invited me back to his place for a movie, which was in walking distance of mine anyways so I wasn't worried, and he reminded me that there was no play to be had. Well, long story short the second the door shut and he tries to make a pass at me, he springs on me that I'm his property now, that if I was actually interested in kink I clearly wanted this, etc, and I had to get up and walk out the door. If I hadn't done that at the moment I did I don't know what would have happened. This is unacceptable. HOWEVER, I have some small issues with what you have wrote. HOW DO YOU KNOW ANY OF WHAT HE TOLD YOU WAS TRUE? How Long was he in the lifestyle? How do you know this, How do you know he had any experience? What Defined his Experience? Just because he told you this it has to be true? I know MANY people who are MUCH older than me Physically who have MUCH less time than me involved in this lifestyle. I know Many people who are Older and Talk a good game who have never ACTUALLY HAD A SLAVE. You simply fell into the Too Good To be True catigory and found a douche bag who tried to take advantage of your youth and inexperience. If you cannot Verify someone's reputation then you really need to take a little extra time to see how they interact in a living breathing BDSM community. As Has been said CollarMe is not a community it is an Online Forum and Personals Site. That being said however you can ask anyone here who has read my threads what they think of me and many of these people have I spoken to personally, anyone on my friends list on my Profile can verify that I may have strong opinions about things but I am certainly NOT a threat. quote:
ORIGINAL: aLittleKitten Now, clearly, I know I was in the wrong for going to his place in the first place without much more communication, etc. But the whole experience has really tainted me. This Part bothers me. You are tainted by an experience in which you should have learned something from and what you should have learned isn't that Dominant men are dangerous, but rather Putting yourself in Dangerous situations with Dominant men you really don't know is dangerous. I swear to god, if this man was vanilla and and you just wanted to hang out would you freak out over all the Vanilla guys too? I mean there really is no difference between BDSM Dating and Vanilla Dating the only difference is the DEFINED and DISCUSSED power dynamic. You happen to find a douche bag, not all dominants are douche bags take you time getting to know them and remember until you believe you can trust them explisitly with your requests or you WANT to have sex with them there is NO reason to ever go to a Private HOME. Until you can Trust that they will respect your boundries on sex and physical activities then the provate home just needs to be off limits, same as Kink CLubs and Hotel Rooms. Common Sence. Steel
_____________________________
Just Steel Resident Therapeutic Metallurgist The Steel Warm-Up © ™ For the Uber Posters Thanks for the Grammatical support : ) ~ Term
|