Ialdabaoth
Posts: 1073
Joined: 5/4/2008 From: Tempe, AZ Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Loki45 It doesn't. If the person who just coldly, brutally murdered your loved one is not put down, the blood of his next victim is on your hands as well. What part of "we need to fix them" didn't you read? Of course you keep them restricted while you're repairing them, for the same reason you shut down malfunctioning equipment before going in to fix it - you don't want anyone else getting hurt. quote:
Sure, your loved one is gone, so you can't save them. But killers usually aren't content with just one victim, nor are theives, nor is nearly anyone else who turns to crime. People turn to crime for THOUSANDS of different reasons. Let's stick to the murderer right now; I don't think we can extrapolate one case into another as easily as you're trying to, here. quote:
Don't lock up a murderer? His next victim is a life you could have saved. Ok, fine, but when you (earlier in thread) complain about jail being "too easy" on them, it's easy to assume that you aren't just talking about locking them up. And why do you keep assuming that I'm not talking about locking someone up? Look, we both know that shoving someone in a box for 10 - 25 years does nothing to fix them - especially when you put them in with other people who will teach them how to be more of a problem when they get out. So how about we start talking about solutions instead of yelling at each other that what we THINK the other person is talking about is stupid? quote:
Don't lock up a theif? The next person who comes home to an empty house might not have, if you'd only acted. Right. But when someone steals because they have no other options? Maybe part of what we should be doing - while we keep them locked up, mind - is giving them more options. You know? quote:
How is it you are not understanding this? What I'm not understanding is how what you're talking about has anything to do with what I'm talking about, at this point. quote:
You say you act to make things better. In the scenario I posted, the difference between you and me is you are thinking short-term. For your loved one only. I'm thinking of everyone. Everyone, that is, except for the murderer who in my opinion forfeited his right to live the moment her murdered my loved one. *ahem* BWAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHA!!!! Right then. quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ialdabaoth Which is yet another reason why our justice system is fucked. We need to fix these people, not pen them up where they learn how to be worse thugs from each other. And the ones that can't be fixed, we need to put down, as gently and humanely as we can. How do you fix someone who is beyond repair? YOU DON'T. Have you not been reading the *pauses, counts* FOUR times I've said "put them down if they can't be fixed?" Are you just looking for a fight? Please, let's have an actual conversation here, okay? You're actually starting to frustrate me. quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ialdabaoth I'd rather we not have that humor at other peoples' expenses. The world is fucked and we shouldn't be trying to make it worse than it already is. Are you serious? Most of humor is at someone else's expense. Take any comedic movie out now....most of the situations are us laughing at the plight of some hapless on-screen nitwit who has ridiculously bad luck in life. Look at Eddie Murphy, Richard Pryor. Any great "comedian." They make a living poking fun a someone else'se appearance, stupidity, lack of common sense, etc. That's the basis for comedy. Hell, look at the THREE STOOGES. Three guys beating the tar out of each other and acting like idiots. And we laugh. We laugh at their 'expense.' To me, laughing at unintended comedy is the same as laughing at intended comedy. I know, and I typically don't find very much of it funny. EDIT: er, addendum - I should say, I only find it funny when it's directed at people in an effort to get them to change. Just laughing out of spite I find horrific.
< Message edited by Ialdabaoth -- 7/11/2009 11:42:08 PM >
|