Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: the experienced submissive


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: the experienced submissive Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: the experienced submissive - 8/11/2009 5:39:03 AM   
LillyoftheVally


Posts: 1826
Joined: 7/22/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Apocalypso

Much as I find my penis fascinating, I can't help feeling it is outside the purview of the OP. Possibly start a thread to discuss it? I think it's worth being the sole focus of the discussion.



I think we would need a whole message board on the topic to fit it all in to be honest.

< Message edited by LillyoftheVally -- 8/11/2009 5:40:04 AM >


_____________________________

'My doctor says that I have a malformed public-duty gland and a natural deficiency in moral fibre, and that I am therefore excused from saving Universes.'

Nah I am not happy to see you either

(in reply to Apocalypso)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: the experienced submissive - 8/11/2009 7:25:32 AM   
Masterntn


Posts: 14
Joined: 6/4/2008
Status: offline
What is experience?  It is simply one's past history.  The point here is simple. It doesn't matter if one is sub or Dom.  Experience is part of life and something accrued as we age.  If one is truly submissive they should be living their life in a submissive manner.  Ones past experiences can and usually always will effect one's mindset thus causing them to act in certain ways.  It is up to the individual to decide if these past experiences, good or bad, will influence who they are today.  We all have choices.  We choose how to react to any given situation. If our experience is bad then at times we can choose to let it influence us to a point where we become disabled and fearful to even put ourselves out there.  If our experiences are good we have a tendency to be more outgoing and take more chances in an effort to continue our good feelings.  Regardless if one is sub or Dom there will be events in our lives that will mold us.  It is up to each of us individually to decide how we will react to these situations.  For anyone to judge or assume is simply wrong.

(in reply to sweetsub1957)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: the experienced submissive - 8/11/2009 8:10:54 AM   
CallaFirestormBW


Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: daintydimples

In another thread I came across the concept that the experienced submissive was somehow viewed as damaged goods. The idea seemed to be that a sub with a certain amount of experience must be a failure at relationships.

Experience in a dominant is highly valued; experience in a submissive is not.

Thoughts?


~FR~

My thought is that it depends on the experience. If an individual's experiences are ones that would enhance our household -- if xhe brings new skills, new ideas, and a positive attitude into our demesne, then being an "experienced" submissive individual is, indeed, a valuable thing. Such a servant would be a welcome addition, and we would do our best to continue that history of positive experiences.

On the other hand, if hir experiences have been dysfunctional -- many poor choices, bad attitude, a non-existent skill-set, incapacity to think or reason or use common sense, and a lot of baggage resulting from multiple poor choices over a long period of time, then no, hir experience is -not- a valuable thing. It doesn't necessarily mean that we wouldn't accept her, but xhe'd be brought in as a 'fix-er-upper', and we would have to know that we had the time and energy to basically undo all those previous experiences and start from wherever we could find healthy tissue -- and sometimes that is a VERY long process, because there isn't much left alive aside from the smallest tip down near the root... and bringing such a servant back to functional life is a long, drawn-out, and labor-intensive process.

Most servants with experiences are somewhere in between, and it can be a real challenge to get through the more dysfunctional aspects of a servant's development, even if one -knows- that the overall state is a productive one. The thing is, many folks aren't really forthright about where they're damaged -- sort of like used cars, but you can't get a "ServantFAX" report to let the Keeper know about hidden and covered-up damage. Because of this, I think that some dominant-leaning folks are inclined to err on the side of caution and avoid 'experienced' submissive individuals, just on the off chance that there is more under the chassis than they feel they can reasonably risk --  and I can -fully- understand why some dominant-leaning folks would tend to avoid any possibility of ending up in such a situation. Honestly, it's good for both the servant and the Keeper in that situation, because a poorly prepared or overwhelmed Keeper may only end up adding to the accumulation of non-growth-promoting experiences.

Dame Calla


_____________________________

***
Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!"

"Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer

(in reply to daintydimples)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: the experienced submissive - 8/11/2009 10:04:03 AM   
AnimusRex


Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Apocalypso
Nice way of appearing gentlemanly to the women who fit your personal preference, without that obviously being your motivation.  Bravo, sirrah!


Doffs My hat and bows- I am a sly dog, aren't I?

And yes, I do need mockery often.

But the underlying point is that older Men chasing younger women is not a simple preference similar to "I like blondes and you like brunettes"; there is a powerful biological purpose behind it.

But there is a tension, isn't there between our celebration of the raw untamed sexual desire, and our need for community, family, committment and emotional bonding?

Certainly some May-December romances are loving, committed and ideal; and tolerance is our goal. But, in My view,what should not be tolerated is our societies ruthless fixation on youth, specifically female youth, innocence and naivete. This leads to the bizarre sight of Britney Spears trying desperately to be both innocent virgin and worldly whore. No wonder the poor girl had a nervous breakdown.

There is a sense in the alternative sex and BDSM/ Gor societies that we can strip away all of the boundaries and guidelines of behavior, that we are in a ethical wilderness, guided only by whatever urges our gentials send us. This is what accounts for the daily barrage of emails women get from slavering males howling for them to show their tits.
It ends up demeaning both Men and women. If we strip away the external boundaries that society erects, I would like to think that we create new ones that help us to be better than we are.

(in reply to Apocalypso)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: the experienced submissive - 8/11/2009 10:52:00 AM   
Apocalypso


Posts: 1104
Joined: 4/20/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex
But the underlying point is that older Men chasing younger women is not a simple preference similar to "I like blondes and you like brunettes"; there is a powerful biological purpose behind it.


I suspect we are probably coming from very different philosophical worldviews here.  I would almost entirely reject biological explanations for behaviour in favour of a sociological perspective.  I mention that because I think we can understand each other's outlooks, but it does mean that we're not ever going to see these issues from the same angle.

quote:

But there is a tension, isn't there between our celebration of the raw untamed sexual desire, and our need for community, family, committment and emotional bonding?


Only because of societal taboos.  If we accept that sexual desire is something to be celebrated, the tension disappears.

quote:

Certainly some May-December romances are loving, committed and ideal; and tolerance is our goal. But, in My view,what should not be tolerated is our societies ruthless fixation on youth, specifically female youth, innocence and naivete. This leads to the bizarre sight of Britney Spears trying desperately to be both innocent virgin and worldly whore. No wonder the poor girl had a nervous breakdown.


I'd broadly agree.  But I think that a counterfixation that takes against youth as I think you do if you imply that youth is directly linked to innocence and naivete, the problem is compounded.  If we assign absolute traits to any non self-selecting group, whether based on race, sex, age or whatever, it ends up demonising those who don't have those traits, without necessarily that being our aim.  (Although I am somewhat contradictory here, because I do think we need a definition of "adulthood" for the sake of society and the young.  But that's a contradiction I merely accept). We need to look at the issue of what is and isn't valued.  And the virgin/whore dichotomy does need attacking.  But I think you're attacking a symptom, not a cause.

quote:

There is a sense in the alternative sex and BDSM/ Gor societies that we can strip away all of the boundaries and guidelines of behavior, that we are in a ethical wilderness, guided only by whatever urges our gentials send us. This is what accounts for the daily barrage of emails women get from slavering males howling for them to show their tits.


It has nothing to do with BDSM/Gor/Alternative societies I think.  It's the Internet, and specifically the anonmyity.  Power withour responsibility.  The prerogative of the harlot and the eunuch.

quote:

It ends up demeaning both Men and women. If we strip away the external boundaries that society erects, I would like to think that we create new ones that help us to be better than we are.

Oh, absolutely.  (Although  I would note that sometimes it is necessary to tear down before you have space to build).  To live outside the law, you must be honest, as the old saying goes.  My issue is more that I think to dismiss relationships based on the age of the people involved is merely to repeat old mistakes.  If we're going to make mistakes, at least let them be ours rather than other peoples.  I suspect we are getting into metaphysical issues well outside this threads remit, however.


_____________________________

If you're going to quote from the Book of Revelation,
Don't keep calling it the "Book of Revelations",
There's no "s", it's the Book of Revelation,
As revealed to Saint John the Divine.

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: the experienced submissive - 8/13/2009 5:05:36 PM   
CaringandReal


Posts: 1397
Joined: 2/15/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW


Most servants with experiences are somewhere in between, and it can be a real challenge to get through the more dysfunctional aspects of a servant's development, even if one -knows- that the overall state is a productive one. The thing is, many folks aren't really forthright about where they're damaged -- sort of like used cars, but you can't get a "ServantFAX" report to let the Keeper know about hidden and covered-up damage. Because of this, I think that some dominant-leaning folks are inclined to err on the side of caution and avoid 'experienced' submissive individuals, just on the off chance that there is more under the chassis than they feel they can reasonably risk --  and I can -fully- understand why some dominant-leaning folks would tend to avoid any possibility of ending up in such a situation. Honestly, it's good for both the servant and the Keeper in that situation, because a poorly prepared or overwhelmed Keeper may only end up adding to the accumulation of non-growth-promoting experiences.



You really find that many people are damaged and not enhanced by their experiences as submissives? Why do you think that is? Bad former owners?

(in reply to CallaFirestormBW)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: the experienced submissive - 8/14/2009 5:24:14 AM   
KCalli


Posts: 81
Joined: 8/4/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyoftheVally


quote:

ORIGINAL: daintydimples

In another thread I came across the concept that the experienced submissive was somehow viewed as damaged goods. The idea seemed to be that a sub with a certain amount of experience must be a failure at relationships.

Experience in a dominant is highly valued; experience in a submissive is not.

Thoughts?




To be honest I don't know at what point you become 'experienced' one scene? 5? 3 PE relationships? I dunno. I kinda see what they are saying, that you can have a relationship in a certain way and your next partner may want it to be completely different. If having previous relationships makes me damaged goods then I guess Ill just have to put a 'sale' sticker on my ass


Same here, I guess it is sale time. Much the pity. But I have found it to be true. Personally I don't often talk of my past. 1) it is very personal 2) None of their business unless pertinent. What is the present and future is what is important. Each relationship is unique. Too bad it isn't seen as such with subs. Personally, I would mold myself to my Dom's desires. It has nothing to do with the past. I submit to him.

(in reply to LillyoftheVally)
Profile   Post #: 67
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: the experienced submissive Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063