RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes.

RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 8:21:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: janiebelle You mocked a pretty significant minority. The people on welfare. Nice try, but no cigar. Follow along if you're capable: 1. The LIAR stated, "I don't kick people when they are already down and out." 2. I stated, "What the hell are you talking about [Because the comment made zero sense]... are you in the Welfare line or something and want sympathy?!! [Mocked the liar for interjecting something nonsensical, not "people on welfare", as you falsely allege]. The above has zero to do with anything posted. [Again, because the comment made zero sense]" So you're wrong, and in typical forum fashion are simply showing bias instead of actually noting what has been stated. Moreover, you completetly IGNORE the fact that two of your fellow posters, when just seeing the word "welfare" IMMEDIATELY equate welfare with "minorities". Not only is that assumption INNACURATE, but to make that leap is RACIST!!! Had someone other than one of your forum pals made that leap, you'd be up on your soap box damning them... but because it's not, you ignore it, showing both intellectual dishonesty and selective outrage. Grow up, or at least grow a backbone. Either would do.

Arpig -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 8:46:16 AM)
Are you in politics? If not you should be, because you duck and dodge the questions and issues like a junior Minister at Question period. quote: 1. The LIAR stated, "I don't kick people when they are already down and out." 2. I stated, "What the hell are you talking about [Because the comment made zero sense]... are you in the Welfare line or something and want sympathy?!! [Mocked the liar for interjecting something nonsensical, not "people on welfare", as you falsely allege]. The above has zero to do with anything posted. [Again, because the comment made zero sense]" Your response about welfare was indeed mocking people on welfare, not the poster. You may not have intended it to do so, but it did, and people on welfare are indeed in the minority, (or are you alledging that they are the majority?) and thus mocking a minority Nobody here has made any racist remarks, and nobody here except you has lied. We would all appreciate it if you would take a pill and calm down a little and just respond to the questions and issues that were people raised in response to your statements, which you so far have failed to do. As an extra favour, could you answer Ian Anderson's great question: How does it feel to be thick.....as a brick?

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 9:12:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: oceanwinds The orginal OP had started an intelligent question which I would like to hear others opinions. Unfortunately there was one who felt their mission was to trash everyone. Not true. Go back to the first page and start reading... I gave my opinion, just as others gave theirs. Then it took a short turn on the Castle Realm stuff... then the debate about that BDSM can be "all physical" (which I proved it's not)... and THEN one of your forum pals got snarky (on page 3 about the physical stuff); that's when the thread went South. You forum pals are to blame. The thread did get back on track... and then again, one of your forum pals (the racist), having lost the "physical" debate (and bruising his ego), decided to open his unnformed mouth about minorities and welfare... and in doing so both side-tracked the thread again and revealed his RACIST views.

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 9:18:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Arpig Nobody here has made any racist remarks... Oh really? Hmmm... quote: ORIGINAL: Arpig ...the majority of people on welfare, in the US, in Canada, and in the UK are minorities You're not only WRONG, but a RACIST for spewing this garbage!!!

janiebelle -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 9:27:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote: ORIGINAL: janiebelle You mocked a pretty significant minority. The people on welfare. Nice try, but no cigar. Follow along if you're capable: 1. The LIAR stated, "I don't kick people when they are already down and out." 2. I stated, "What the hell are you talking about [Because the comment made zero sense]... are you in the Welfare line or something and want sympathy?!! [Mocked the liar for interjecting something nonsensical, not "people on welfare", as you falsely allege]. The above has zero to do with anything posted. [Again, because the comment made zero sense]" So you're wrong, and in typical forum fashion are simply showing bias instead of actually noting what has been stated. Moreover, you completetly IGNORE the fact that two of your fellow posters, when just seeing the word "welfare" IMMEDIATELY equate welfare with "minorities". Not only is that assumption INNACURATE, but to make that leap is RACIST!!! Had someone other than one of your forum pals made that leap, you'd be up on your soap box damning them... but because it's not, you ignore it, showing both intellectual dishonesty and selective outrage. Grow up, or at least grow a backbone. Either would do. OK, I will say this one more time. Please try to think before you bang out another knee-jerk response. This racist thing is a strawman. You were the one who made the leap to "minority=race". Drop it already; it is not germaine to the subject at hand. As for anyone of these people being my buddies, I've never corresponded with any of them, let alone ever met a one of them. That assumption is INACCURATE, to quote a fool. If one of these posters said something racist, they wouldn't get a bit of damnation from me about the racism, but instead, like I am here, I would nail them for going so far off topic. I'll extend the offer yet again. If you want to talk racism, I'll see you on stormfront. Be forewarned, though- you better be packing some brass balls. While I tend to my spine, how about you try to scrounge up a manner or two? If you talk the way you write, I cringe to think you kiss your mother with that mouth. j j

mnottertail -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 9:30:27 AM)
Being a reasonably fake dom and wannabee, I find myself agreeing with the entire shit-o-ree, up to this very post. R

ModeratorEleven -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 10:10:41 AM)
Last warning kids, lose the flaming or we'll lose you. XI

janiebelle -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 10:11:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote: ORIGINAL: Arpig Nobody here has made any racist remarks... Oh really? Hmmm... quote: ORIGINAL: Arpig ...the majority of people on welfare, in the US, in Canada, and in the UK are minorities You're not only WRONG, but a RACIST for spewing this garbage!!! All right, MSLA, I tried to save your skin on this by saying that the breakdown by race was not relevant, but you just couldn’t leave well enough alone. I would say I hate to be the one to tell you, but that would be a lie. And I don’t lie. According to Andrew Hacker’s Two Nations Black and White: Separate, Hostile, Unequal (p. 87 in the edition on my shelf) the breakdown of welfare recipients by race in the USA is as follows: 57.9% minorities (black, Hispanic, and Asian), 38.8% white, 3.3% “other”. So, are you a liar, or simply mistaken? Either way, if you have any manners, apologize to Arpig. He was not wrong. And he’s no racist (I am confident in that assessment even though I don’t know him well. It takes one to know one, as they say, and I have yet to spot any comment from him that was the slightest bit racist). j

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 10:22:13 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: janiebelle According to Andrew Hacker’s Two Nations Black and White: Separate, Hostile, Unequal (p. 87 in the edition on my shelf) the breakdown of welfare recipients by race in the USA is as follows: 57.9% minorities (black, Hispanic, and Asian), 38.8% white, 3.3% “other”. WRONG... you're doing what many do to justify the false view of welfare by using PERCENTAGES instead of TOTALS. There are MORE WHITE PEOPLE ON WELFARE; i.e., there are a greater number of white people on welfare. Example: ~ If you have 1,000,000 white people in total, and 100,000 of them are on welfare, then you could express that as 10% on welfare. ~ If you have 300,000 hispanic people in total, and 100,000 of them are on welfare, then you could express that as 33% on welfare. Using the percentages does NOT change that there are still 1,000,000 white people (i.e., 700,000 more) on welfare. The "strawman" is to use the percentages to support the racist views on welfare, instead of the actual numbers. And the fact remains, THERE ARE MORE WHITE PEOPLE ON WELFARE. That's what I stated, and that t is true. Go check it out for yourself.

sirsholly -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 10:27:15 AM)
quote: WRONG... you're doing what many do to justify the false view of welfare by using PERCENTAGES instead of TOTALS. There are MORE WHITE PEOPLE ON WELFARE; i.e., there are a greater number of white people on welfare. it is not the percent of the indivudal race she is quoting...but the breakdown of the races on welfare. The three figures total 100%

Sunnyfey -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 10:28:38 AM)
[sm=diethreaddie.gif][sm=diethreaddie.gif][sm=diethreaddie.gif][sm=diethreaddie.gif] Jesus people, this is getting retarded honestly.

ModeratorEleven -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 10:29:37 AM)
Now that we have the difference between raw numbers and percentages sorted out, welfare statistics are not the topic of this thread. If you want to discuss welfare statistics, please start another thread in the Off Topic forum to do it. XI

WyldHrt -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 12:45:25 PM)
quote: Anyways this is a good topic, please let's not let one person derail it. Agreed quote: I am sure, as we have seen, there are those who from other countries use this site to get money, and they use other sites and means too. Nothing fake about them, they are experts in conning people. Got to disagree with you there, ocean. IMO, when a 30 year old man is pretending to be a 21 year old woman, or a professional scammer is pretending to be an engineer, using photos stolen off the web, sending gifts paid for with stolen credit cards, and lying with every word they write to their victims, that's about as fake as it gets.

IronBear -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 1:56:10 PM)
Surely this would be classified as a REAL/FAKE in as much as they are real con artists and fake what ever it is they are purporting to be? Mayhap they are indeed Real aliens and Fake humans.

sirsholly -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 2:06:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: IronBear Surely this would be classified as a REAL/FAKE in as much as they are real con artists and fake what ever it is they are purporting to be? Mayhap they are indeed Real aliens and Fake humans. i keep thinking of a piece of art work. Is it a real forgery or a fake original? Is there a difference? If there is, does it really matter? I mean...who cares?

IronBear -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 2:12:11 PM)
Only the collector and the Insurance company I imagine. Were i to own a number of master Pieces of classic art as in paintings, I'd damn well make sure that the ones on my wall were legal fakes (authorised copies) whilst the originals were on loan to a public gallery for the populace to enjoy too..

nephandi -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 2:26:26 PM)
Greetings quote: No. If an alleged Dom sends an introductory, "On your knees, cunt... I'm now your Master!" communication, that is NOT someone who simply "doesn't know any better"... that's an idoit who could care less... an HNG. I once got a mail that said on your knees and suck my cock bitch. I politely answered: quote: You want me to get down on my knees and suck your cock that comes all the way from USA? I am impressed, right across the Atlantic, what a length. But tell me do it not hurt when boats and cars run over it, and how do you move with a so many thousands of miles long dick, it must be a real hassle. Strangely I never go a rely back. Why call these pepole fakers when it is much more fun to insult them. I wish you well

IronBear -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/18/2009 2:34:23 PM)
~Coughs coffee over the screen in a fit of laughter~ I agree they do provide much entertainment.

vixenmoon -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/19/2009 11:39:22 AM)
quote: The person with a brain that questions the idiot that tosses about the "You're my property" after 2 emails, for example. Oh, yeah. Or from the initial email. There are many who just want an excuse to be a jerk and get somethin.

vixenmoon -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/19/2009 1:31:26 PM)
I find that there are indeed fakes... those who lie, those who claim to have more experience than they have, etc. They are faking it. They're lying. That can put me at risk if I were to go along with them, and as such, I have no qualms using fake or wanna be. However, I still try to not. I more prefer just to say bad (such as those who start off conversing with me by degrading me or commanding my obedience; they definitely haven't read my profile if they think that I'm into that). That being totally my perspective, it doesn't matter to anyone besides myself and those who care about me. Live and let live, let people do what they will... but be honest. Shouldn't be too much to ask.

Page: << < prev 8 9 [10] 11 12 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125