|
Arpig -> RE: regarding fake doms and wanna bes. (7/17/2009 10:34:44 AM)
|
quote:
There is no default...
I see...
1) Their approach is invalid because it is not the default of all slaves.
2) There is no default of all slaves.
therefore...all approachs are invalid. We are all fakes!!![sm=cheerleader.gif]
quote:
They learn a few buzz words and think all subs/slaves are the same Now you are a mind reader as well as being the final arbiter of what is and what isn't real Twue BDSM, amazing! Maybe, just maybe, its not so much that they think all subs/slaves are the same, but they want a sub/slave that is that way.
You have effectively declared anybody who does not see and approach BDSM the way you do to be fake. On what basis do you pontificate? I would like to see your credentials please.
You are being dishonest in your debate here
First you claim they are Castle Realm losers and use an attitude that is pretty much the opposite of that presented on the site, and when called on your misrepresentation, you then change your mind and deride the website for a different reason.
Then you state that BDSM is not encapsulated in the physical. When confronted on this by the fact that for very many people it is in fact "encapsulated" by the physical, you suddenly switch to saying it is not 100% physical, that there is a mental aspect to the acts involved, something that in no way affects the encapsulation of BDSM in the physical (or mental, or emotional for that matter).
Then you declared other views of what a slave is to be invalid because it is not the default for all slaves. Amazingly enough, when this was questioned suddenly what you really meant is that these "net-Doms" assume that their view is the default, therefore their view is invalid.
In another thread you claimed 99% of the Doms are fakes, and when confronted with the absurdity of that claim you suddenly switched to saying its just an expression.
Clearly your words cannot be taken at face value. You misrepresent what you say as soon as somebody points out the flaws in what you have said. That is, at the very least, dishonest.
|
|
|
|
