RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission

RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

Wyzardsgirl -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 1:17:24 AM)
Remember, people that the morons from 4chan started the LOL cats meme. Shows how intelligent they are, They collected pictures of cats and then added stupid captions to them.

Wyzardsgirl -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 1:20:10 AM)
Not to mention that the 4chan idiots use what they refer to as the /b board to post child porn. Do you all really want this person to keep posting here? He and his 4chan friends should consider themselves damned lucky they haven't been arrested yet.

Wyzardsgirl -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 1:40:12 AM)
The idiot who started this thread is likely to be arrested since he's obviously from 4 chan's /b board where they post child porno, happily and gleefully. Best not to give him anymore attention. Agreed? Thanks again for your time. This idiot with his 'lulz' attitude shouldn't be tolerated. I know a 4chan, b/board poster who posts child porno since a friend once sent me a link to that disgusting site. Do NOT respond, do NOT implicate yourselves in his games. His ass will soon be brought to the attention of the appropriate authorities.

GCXcess -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 1:41:18 AM)
Wow, 6.. no.. 8 replies in a row within the space of an hour. Who's getting over who?

Wyzardsgirl -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 1:47:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: GCXcess Wow, 6.. no.. 8 replies in a row within the space of an hour. Who's getting over who? Sorry if I offended you, but the OP set himself up for attacks. Again, when he uses 'LULZ', that is a strong indication that he's from 4chan's /b board Those people regularly post child porno. And he's getting off on finding his way HERE to keep spouting his hatefuls BS. He posted where he just 'takes' and 'uses' a sub. He never gave any indication that he had any experience in owning a sub /slave. It was all about HIM using someone because he thought it made him look good. Far from it. But deal with it as you wish to deal with it. He makes my skin crawl, and most other responsible adults would agree with me.

GCXcess -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 1:56:29 AM)
Not offended; puzzled perhaps. And I must admit a little entertained. Usually I just sit back and watch, but I couldn't help but make a post on this It just doesn't look.. healthy.. to post 8 messages in a row telling people to ignore a person. I'll admit I'm making my own assumptions as I'm 'new here' - although it would seem you are, too. And assuming someone's from the 'child pr0n 4chan bboard' because they 'use the word lulz' is... a bit of a stretch. If that's the case then I need to go make about 40 pedophile reports to the fuzz. If you find his opinions or theories, what-have-you, offensive, or just find him to be a bit of a prick, welllllllll..

SweetPoosy -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 2:29:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Wyzardsgirl Remember, people that the morons from 4chan started the LOL cats meme. Shows how intelligent they are, They collected pictures of cats and then added stupid captions to them. OK, first, what's the matter with LOLcats? I like LOLcats, some of my best friends are always sending me the links and stuff. None of my friends (Hell, even my 82 year old MOTHER sends me LOLcats!) have ever HEARD of 4chan, in fact, I had never heard of it myself until you started ranting and I popped over to Wiki to see what you were on about. Whether I agree with the original poster or not, or whether I think he is an ass is a moot point, but accusing him of being a person who posts child pornography just because he uses the word "lulz" comes off as a bit extreme. I find myself in complete agreement with GCXcess, and I would add that it seems that you "doth protest too much". I wonder what your real issue is, and if you aren't spreading the 4chan word all by yourself!

DMFParadox -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 4:43:26 AM)
I'm not 'from' /b/. But I did have it on my tagline for, oh, OVER A YEAR. Now, when I take it off and I'm posting about something completely unrelated, I'm accused of 4channery? That's awesome irony, man! I did try to reply back to people who responded in a friendly way with a friendly response, and as for the haters? Well, sure. One thing /b/ does very.effing.well. is trollery, and pointless flame wars; so I am offended by neither, and I am amused by those who are. Call me an ass all you want, I want you to understand that as far as flame wars go, y'all are amateurs. Still doesn't mean I won't poke back occasionally. Wyzardsgirl: I don't bother with child porn, there or anywhere else. I also don't care about it one way or another, except insofar as being fascinated by the anthropology of it all. How did that even get brought up? Actually, don't answer. You're clearly back from a recent channing expedition yourself. Go calm down, stick your head in a bucket of water or something until the horrifying imagery goes away, k?

DMFParadox -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 4:50:04 AM)
Wait. Her profile was made YESTERDAY. She knows Chan, which is kind of a college thing... two plus two, carry the two... Gator? Is that you? Girl. You are a FREAK. I like that, but really, private drama is private, y'know? Can you just post rude essays of me on your profile or something?

crouchingtigress -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 5:02:34 AM)
shakes head...It just never does work out well when a post starts out with "New phillosophy on....."

angelikaJ -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 5:04:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DMFParadox quote: ORIGINAL: angelikaJ quote: ORIGINAL: DMFParadox 4) Aggression happens when you stand up. You're committing aggression against displaced air. And MY dominance is more effective the more aggressive I am... . Dominance to me has to do with... quote: ORIGINAL: DMFParadox Aggression happens when you stand up. You're committing aggression against displaced air. And MY dominance is more effective the more aggressive I am, to a certain point, at which it becomes less effective. Like a bell curve,... Thanks for bolding that bit. It gave me the perfect opportunity to bold my own bit. Aggressiveness is not a bad thing. My point was that it wasn't dominance, which is what you're trying to educate me on. This makes me lol. quote: In my humble opinion it is poor form to aggress towards people who disagree with you (and it does not portray you in a dominant light). In my humble opinion you just aggressed because you found my opinion disagreeable. Or you could also have aggressively agreed with me, had you felt like doing so. But you find 'aggress' distasteful, and... what? What's your point? It's a fact of life. Aggression happens, it's never not going to happen, and it's better to lay it on the table than suck it in and end up on a murder spree. Or dying of stress overload. If someone disagrees with me, and upon review I disagree with them, I will strenuously and stridently and AGGRESSIVELY disagree right back at 'em. And enjoy every minute of it, especially when I finally hammer the point home but even when I don't. Don't like it, don't step to the plate. Thank you for clarifying... I did miss that when I skimmed the first time.

DMFParadox -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 5:05:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: crouchingtigress shakes head...It just never does work out well when a post starts out with "New phillosophy on....." Yeah, no crap. Remember the days when you could write a book on a new 'philosophy', with all kinds of random and pointless analogies in it and have entire cult followings? Marx, Freud, those guys had it good, man. I miss those days.

IronBear -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 8:32:20 AM)
I've managed to sift through the posts on this thread and as far as being a New Philosophy on Dominance, it is better that one or two I've read elsewhere but not nearly as lucid or well defined as Mein Kampf.. It does in fact smack of a rambling justification for some one to use s/m to get their rocks off, but of course I could be mistaken. However I'm not really going to allocate the time and energy to dissect the OP and debate it, it probable whold require me to be an Armchair Psychologist which I am not, just your ordinary run of the mill board certified psychologist with two psych degrees.. Thanks any way for the chuckles I had and I wish you well..

sweetsub1957 -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 9:26:18 AM)
Bravo, IronBear!! [sm=applause.gif]

LillyoftheVally -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 9:42:32 AM)
FR People can and will apply their own logic and reasoning to things. There is a hell of a lot that I disagree with throughout this entire thread but then I do not attempt to theorise what other people get out of wiitwd, as far as I am concerned you can think that the reason you are a dominant/sublissive/switch is because you didn't like onions as a child but love them now. The main reason I think this is because I am not in a relationship with any of the people in this thread, I tend to ally myself with those of a similar 'philosophy' which is that you can't explain human behaviour with fancy words or tenuous links between cause and effect, people are a little more complex than that and no one theory fits all. Op if you have found what you think explains why you identify with the term Dominant that is great, truly, and I hope that it gives you clarity and comfort to have those reasons however I do not believe that your theory works for all or even most people who identify with any of the terms. That is fine, who cares? Just be happy in what you have learned about yourself.

DesFIP -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 11:24:20 AM)
OP, you haven't responded in a friendly manner to anyone. You're either nasty or defensive. And your profile says you're almost 30 but you don't act like it. Hell, my 16 year old is more adult in his interactions, real life and online, than you have shown yourself capable of.

RedMagic1 -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 11:25:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesFIP OP, you haven't responded in a friendly manner to anyone. You're either nasty or defensive. He is dominating us.

DesFIP -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 11:27:55 AM)
10 pts, Red

Apocalypso -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 1:11:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Wyzardsgirl Do NOT respond, do NOT implicate yourselves in his games. His ass will soon be brought to the attention of the appropriate authorities. Being a channer is illegal now? Wow. Talk about a police state. (If he is a channer you going all hysterical is exactly the wrong response, yo. "I shall defeat the evil troll by being really easy to troll"). Take a deep breath. And eat more fresh fruit. quote: Again, when he uses 'LULZ', that is a strong indication that he's from 4chan's /b board Or that he's from the Internet. Lulz isn't a chan meme. It's the plural of LOL and is in general usage by now... Seriously, you're just embarassing yourself now. ROFLCOPTERS. OVER 9000! LMAONADE. MILLHOUSE IS STILL NOT A MEME. Oh noes! I must be a channer too. kthxbi

IrishMist -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 8:51:43 PM)
shrug You take your philosophy; I'll keep mine. Either way, life goes on in much the same vein that it always did.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875