RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission

RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

danno123456 -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 9:00:57 PM)
Why is it that most self proclaimed "Dommes on this site look as if they have spent the last 6 months eating their slaves rather than training them? i mean seriously, if i wanted to be with a fat, gross , lard ass mouthy Domme i would have stayed married. Reality check! if You are over 170 lbs, put some clothes on and stay inside! BBW is a term fat ppl made up to accept themselves!

IronBear -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 9:20:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: danno123456 Why is it that most self proclaimed "Dommes on this site look as if they have spent the last 6 months eating their slaves rather than training them? i mean seriously, if i wanted to be with a fat, gross , lard ass mouthy Domme i would have stayed married. Reality check! if You are over 170 lbs, put some clothes on and stay inside! BBW is a term fat ppl made up to accept themselves! I could be wrong but you young man, may have just crossed the line as far as ToS goes. However your attack of the larger ladies is uncalled for and is incontrovertibly wrong, abusive, unjustified, and offensive but then your profile leaves a great deal to be desired too. I suggest you go and obtain a complete change of attitude and learn how to address people without insults if you want a pleasant and productive life on CM. Of course you could always go elswhere to a site which caters for the ignorant and biggoted members of the human race.

sweetsub1957 -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 9:22:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 quote: ORIGINAL: DesFIP OP, you haven't responded in a friendly manner to anyone. You're either nasty or defensive. He is dominating us. He may think he is Dominating us, but there is a BIG difference between being a Dom and being an ass, to put it bluntly. Sure, if he wants to be, a Dom can be an ass, but just because someone's an ass it doesn't make them a Dom. According to the OP, "MY dominance is more effective the more aggressive I am," so he thinks he's Dominating us all by being a jerk to everyone. He's not being a better Dom, he's just being a bigger, more agressive jerk.

greeneyedreamer -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 9:41:19 PM)
Well, I will admit I am both disagreeing and agreeing. You have mixed up a lot of things but the one that makes me cringe is aggression multiplying dominance. It's awful... It doesn't multiply anything but stupidity. Dominance, TRUE dominance never becomes aggressive, it's ALWAYS in control and never loses it. Your youth is showing. NICE try though... Good that you are thinking... LOVE the thinking...

greeneyedreamer -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 9:44:39 PM)
quote: Why is it that most self proclaimed "Dommes on this site look as if they have spent the last 6 months eating their slaves rather than training them? i mean seriously, if i wanted to be with a fat, gross , lard ass mouthy Domme i would have stayed married. Reality check! if You are over 170 lbs, put some clothes on and stay inside! BBW is a term fat ppl made up to accept themselves! OOHHH MY GOD>>> You want a DOMME TO PAY YOU!!??? (as per what your Profile is insinuating, that is!) what an arrogant little snot... and I suppose the 170 lbs came from your weight! LOL OH MY GOD. When you grow up to be a man, come back to this site and let us know how you feel...

sweetsub1957 -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 9:52:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: IronBear quote: ORIGINAL: danno123456 Why is it that most self proclaimed "Dommes on this site look as if they have spent the last 6 months eating their slaves rather than training them? i mean seriously, if i wanted to be with a fat, gross , lard ass mouthy Domme i would have stayed married. Reality check! if You are over 170 lbs, put some clothes on and stay inside! BBW is a term fat ppl made up to accept themselves! I could be wrong but you young man, may have just crossed the line as far as ToS goes. However your attack of the larger ladies is uncalled for and is incontrovertibly wrong, abusive, unjustified, and offensive but then your profile leaves a great deal to be desired too. I suggest you go and obtain a complete change of attitude and learn how to address people without insults if you want a pleasant and productive life on CM. Of course you could always go elswhere to a site which caters for the ignorant and biggoted members of the human race. [sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif] Three cheers for IronBear!!! Hmmm. Is danno123456 having a bit of a hard time finding anyone to play with? I, too, detect a very nasty attitude coming from him. I don't understand how people think they will ever meet anyone by insulting their focus group. If I were a Domme, even a slim one, I would most certainly pass over his profile after reading a post like that. Also, danno's profile does leave a great deal to be desired. And besides, that came way out of nowhere. This thread is supposed to be on D/s philosophy, not superficial things like appearance. Maybe he should take his bad attitude and start his own thread about his gripe, in Polls and Other Random Stupidity.....and see how long it takes for him to get mod-spanked and deleted.

RedMagic1 -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 9:57:38 PM)
I was being sarcastic. Unfortunately, I believe Mister 123456 was not. I don't quite know what his post had to do with a new philosophy of dominance and submission, though, because I've sure heard that kind of slime before. At least the OP was trying to figure some stuff out, and being equal-opportunity nasty.

sweetsub1957 -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 10:04:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 I was being sarcastic. Unfortunately, I believe Mister 123456 was not. I don't quite know what his post had to do with a new philosophy of dominance and submission, though, because I've sure heard that kind of slime before. At least the OP was trying to figure some stuff out, and being equal-opportunity nasty. Gotcha. [;)]

DemonKia -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/3/2009 10:15:12 PM)
FR, after read thru (& yes, still sneaking away from vacay to get some vacay from my vacay . . . . shakes head . . ... Vacay is supposed to be less stressful & full of BS & conflict than 'real life', isn't it?) & wow, this was a convuluted mess of a thread, I think . . . . .. All kinds of stuff. So. I guess I have two things to add: One. I eschew aggression & seek out assertion. I have been aggressive, too aggressive even, in the past. But now I revel in & cultivate my assertiveness. & two: *kitchen sink. Now this thread has everything . . . . . . snicker*

DMFParadox -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/4/2009 12:45:19 AM)
Ok, I have to agree with the randomness factor. Anybody else here ever played ForumWarz? This thread looks like one of the computer-generated threads from there, no lie.

DMFParadox -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/4/2009 12:51:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 I was being sarcastic. Unfortunately, I believe Mister 123456 was not. I don't quite know what his post had to do with a new philosophy of dominance and submission, though, because I've sure heard that kind of slime before. At least the OP was trying to figure some stuff out, and being equal-opportunity nasty. Yay! I think you're equal-opportunity nasty too, ya big cuddly galoot. Sloppy kisses.

MsMillgrove -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/4/2009 1:00:14 AM)
several pages back.. I attempted to say something positive about the OP. Why? god knows why.. it seemed like a vaguely good idea at the time. Part of my "stay positive" phase.. a rather foolish gameplan for someone as cranky as I am. Now I am delighted that I checked back to see how the thread's going .. it descended into delicious insanity on several different fronts! also I learned about these 4/chan boys too, I will be sure to avoid them in the future by watching out for anyone who says LULZ. how do you pronounce that btw? since the thread is wildly off topic now.. I'd like to ask this burning question that I don't know where to post. What is the form regarding "Admirers?" If you see someone up there, who you don't know, what is that? Are they indicating some interest in you? Should you contact them? I dunno.. I always sat back and let others write me, it's only this week that i wrote two people to see what would happen. Do you contact these "admirer" strangers, what happens if you do? thanks for the laughs. Hope someone helps me with my admirer confusion. MsM

DMFParadox -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/4/2009 1:00:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesFIP OP, you haven't responded in a friendly manner to anyone. You're either nasty or defensive. And your profile says you're almost 30 but you don't act like it. Hell, my 16 year old is more adult in his interactions, real life and online, than you have shown yourself capable of. Oh no! The maturity card has been played! I guess I'm done for! I think you get off on putting people down, babe. Was your post necessary? Was it worth the 2 minutes or so you spent writing it? If so, why? Because you want to stir the pot. Unless you're a total idiot, and think that accusing me of immaturity will do anything but make me amused. This makes you a troll. Welcome! What's funny is that the more you deny this, the more you ARE one. And if you don't, I don't get to see your incoherent and illogical babbling. Actually, that makes me sad, please babble some more.

DMFParadox -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/4/2009 1:10:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MsMillgrove since the thread is wildly off topic now.. I'd like to ask this burning question that I don't know where to post. What is the form regarding "Admirers?" If you see someone up there, who you don't know, what is that? Are they indicating some interest in you? Should you contact them? I dunno.. I always sat back and let others write me, it's only this week that i wrote two people to see what would happen. Do you contact these "admirer" strangers, what happens if you do? thanks for the laughs. Hope someone helps me with my admirer confusion. MsM I'm not sure what the point of 'Admirers' is either, except as an exercise of pure ego. That said, before my 6 month hiatus I had 2 page's worth. When I checked back in last month I had 3 admirers total. Any merit badges you earn online are strictly for the lulz. quote: ORIGINAL: MsMillgrove several pages back.. I attempted to say something positive about the OP. Why? god knows why.. it seemed like a vaguely good idea at the time. Part of my "stay positive" phase.. a rather foolish gameplan for someone as cranky as I am. This line makes you a troll. You are now that which you avowedly seek to avoid. Hooray! Do a dance! Go visit 4chan with your newfound skillz!

greeneyes600 -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/4/2009 12:57:29 PM)
what on earth is 'meme' and 4chan....i must be getting old...

sirsholly -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/4/2009 1:11:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: danno123456 Why is it that most self proclaimed "Dommes on this site look as if they have spent the last 6 months eating their slaves rather than training them? i mean seriously, if i wanted to be with a fat, gross , lard ass mouthy Domme i would have stayed married. Reality check! if You are over 170 lbs, put some clothes on and stay inside! BBW is a term fat ppl made up to accept themselves! weight can be lost. stupidity is forever. i'd say you're screwed.

sirsholly -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/4/2009 1:17:43 PM)
quote: If I am horny I expect enthusiastic satisfaction. and if they are not enthusiastic enough, you will use your other five fingers?

Sunnyfey -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/4/2009 3:54:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: greeneyes600 what on earth is 'meme' and 4chan....i must be getting old... The term Internet meme (pronounced /mi:m/, meem) is a phrase used to describe a catchphrase or concept that spreads quickly from person to person via the Internet, much like an esoteric inside joke.[1] The term is a reference to the concept of memes, although this concept refers to a much broader category of cultural information. 4chan is an English-language imageboard website. Launched on October 1, 2003, its boards are primarily used for the posting of pictures and discussion of manga and anime. Users generally post anonymously and the site has been linked to internet subcultures and activism, most notably Project Chanology. I <3 Wikipedia

DMFParadox -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/5/2009 5:42:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: sirsholly quote: If I am horny I expect enthusiastic satisfaction. and if they are not enthusiastic enough, you will use your other five fingers? Haha!!! I'm keeping that one. Potential responses: "No, I just beat the first five until they move faster." "Wait, you mean I'm supposed to use THREE hands?" <--goin' big "Nah, I'll just add the middle to my index and thumb" -<--going small "Wait, you're supposed to use your fingers? I'm totally doing it wrong." <--for the entertaining reactions, both clever and non

sweetsub1957 -> RE: New philosophy on dominance and submission (8/5/2009 10:26:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DMFParadox quote: ORIGINAL: DesFIP OP, you haven't responded in a friendly manner to anyone. You're either nasty or defensive. And your profile says you're almost 30 but you don't act like it. Hell, my 16 year old is more adult in his interactions, real life and online, than you have shown yourself capable of. Oh no! The maturity card has been played! I guess I'm done for! I'm surprised it wasn't played a LONG time ago. I think you get off on putting people down, babe. Was your post necessary? Was it worth the 2 minutes or so you spent writing it? If so, why? And you don't? I see it as very condescending, calling her "babe." She's not your "babe." Because you want to stir the pot. No, she was merely making an observation and stating her opinion, which she has a right to. Unless you're a total idiot, and think that accusing me of immaturity will do anything but make me amused. It sounds to me like YOU get off on putting people down. This makes you a troll. Welcome! No, this makes her observant. What's funny is that the more you deny this, the more you ARE one. Nope. Still, she is merely stating her observation. If You can't handle that, You must be very insecure. And if you don't, I don't get to see your incoherent and illogical babbling. Actually, that makes me sad, please babble some more.

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4] 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125