rulemylife -> RE: Obama as "The Joker" (8/5/2009 10:28:36 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy No, it was a military success that isolated the Taliban and restricted OBLs movement. Since we did not occupy Afghanistan after that success, things deteriorated again due to the governments inability to defend itself against the Taliban. It is not finishing what GWB started, it is a new effort. Uh.....we did and currently occupy Afghanistan. The mission was not to restrict Bin-Laden, it was to capture him. Which we failed to do because we committed nine times as many troops to the misadventure in Iraq. You did see that quote I posted earlier about "dead or alive"? Don't remember anything about "dead, alive, or restricted". quote:
Moreover Afhanistan a real life laboratory showing the peril of premature withdrawal, and is one of the reasons why Obama changed his rhetoric and his plans on Iraq to match GWBs. Perhaps he will even apply that lesson in Afghanistan. He's shown some progress in retreating on OBL's capture even being an important enough objective to justify the cost, again consistent with GWB. Yeah, you're right. The murder of 3000+ American citizens and attacks on two US cities is really not important enough to bring the man responsible to justice. Hopefully Obama will do the cost-benefit analysis Bush did, after flip-flopping on his dead-or-alive statement, and realize cost is the most important thing. I mean, after all, we all had those little magnets to put on our cars showing how patriotic and outraged we were. What more can we do? Certainly we don't want it to cost us anything.
|
|
|
|