PeonForHer -> RE: heterosexual males sucking cock (the setup) (8/13/2009 1:05:59 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Reigna It's because male sexuality is, of necessity, very rigidly defined and its performance is very strictly monitored. Men HAVE TO be a certain way, and they absolutely MAY NOT deviate from the prescribed course, or else. Women get a little extra slack in this and related matters because our sexuality is less important (if it even exists). A couple of women fucking, well, meh, so what. A couple of men fucking ... my god, society will disintegrate. Apparently the story that Victoria refused to sign any act proscribing lesbianism because she refused to believe that it existed is a myth. I think that male sexuality is more rigidly defined than female sexuality (I think we've talked about this before, Reigna, in relation to ums!) As feminists have frequently pointed out, women have been considered as 'others' - not part of the public world - for centuries in the West. In some crucial sense they 'didn't matter'; therefore, neither did their sexuality. Re that 'power relationship' I mentioned: to be considered homosexual as a male was simultaneously to be considered 'weak'. While lesbians may have been considered odd, unnatural, etc, etc - I don't think they've ever been considered to be weak versions of 'real women'.
|
|
|
|