RE: Why does collarme...

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Why does collarme...

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Why does collarme...

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Why does collarme... - 8/19/2009 7:56:00 PM

ShaharThorne

Posts: 11071
Joined: 2/24/2009
From: Somewhere in TX
Status: offline

More like CM got a new set of volunteers,...err, I mean manual slaves who think they are following company rules. Perhaps I need the MRI of my brain for my profile *cusses out her computer for being a POS*.

As for viewing profiles like I do, nothing fluid should be allowed, including drinks and evening cocktails...

_____________________________

Goddess of Yarn

You are making two and a half feet of irresistible, tubular sex! -Lola, Kinky Boots

Founder: Bitch with Tits

Whip me, beat me, make me feel cheap and have great sex

(in reply to Rhodes85)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: Why does collarme... - 8/20/2009 2:27:41 AM

TurboJugend

Posts: 481
Joined: 6/15/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rhodes85

and to the OP....you're right, the full nude pics are in violation of their TOS...even says in the upload window 'no explicit genital nudity' and they approve them anyway....am I the only one that finds that a bit odd?

it says now
"No explicit primary photos"

not sure what is meant with that. So nude is ok now. And what is explicit....that is different for any one.
So I guess unless people don't report it..it is ok?

(in reply to Rhodes85)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: Why does collarme... - 8/20/2009 6:13:12 PM

Rhodes85

Posts: 445
Joined: 11/15/2008
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TurboJugend

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rhodes85

and to the OP....you're right, the full nude pics are in violation of their TOS...even says in the upload window 'no explicit genital nudity' and they approve them anyway....am I the only one that finds that a bit odd?

it says now
"No explicit primary photos"

not sure what is meant with that. So nude is ok now. And what is explicit....that is different for any one.
So I guess unless people don't report it..it is ok?

Hmm, I hadn't noticed that...then again I haven't updated my pics in awhile lol

I'm not exactly sure what they mean by 'explicit' but I would say its safe to assume it would refer to sexual acts or explicit nudity. If I were running this site i'd make sure I was alot more specific about what is and isn't allowed in pics, so it didn't come back to bite me in the ass later.

I don't particularly trust relying on 'volunteers' to do anything either. Theres good ones, but theres plenty of them that don't really care what they do. Not a good thing considering the site is liable for their actions. I was under the impression most sites stopped relying on volunteers after the administration staff of Ultima Online sued (and won) OSI a few years back.

Well, anyways not a risk I would take.

(in reply to TurboJugend)

Profile

Post #: 23