Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Code d' Odalisque


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Code d' Odalisque Page: <<   < prev  8 9 10 [11] 12   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 2:31:37 AM   
CarrieO


Posts: 2432
Joined: 1/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

I was hoping for a bit of chat about odalisque slavery in Ottoman High culture...


quote:

And another point relevant to earlier posts in this thread. Code d' Odalisque makes no claims to be a historically accurate recreation of odalisque slavery


quote:

I came to this forum offering information on a system of erotic slavery...


I understand your desire to express the interest you have in this code/style of slavery.  I also understand, as I'm sure you do, that it may not appeal to everyone for various reasons.  What I fail to understand is how you can claim your wish was for discussion on slavery in Ottoman/Turk culture and yet when various people address the historicial (?) aspects of the material you offered you respond by saying this code makes no claims on historicial accuracy.  You then continue to offer bits from the site and disregard the attempts at discussion relating to historical slavery/harem life. 

If you want a discussion on slavery in Ottoman culture then stop spouting nonsense from your (?) website and take part in the discussion! 


_____________________________

"No matter what happens in the kitchen, never apologize"~Julia Child~


(in reply to Gentlemanjohn9)
Profile   Post #: 201
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 3:07:02 AM   
Leonidas


Posts: 2078
Joined: 2/16/2004
Status: offline
Ok, seriously now John.

I provided some background on the terms you're using in your "code" early in the thread. I see nothing wrong with you wanting to keep a female slave or slaves in "harem girl" like fashion. Like I said early on, that's my preference too. I don't have any use for a pain-slut or a devotee of elaborate scene-play. I haven't read the website or manifesto that you keep quoting from and aluding to here, but it's fairly clear that you are enamoured of the romantic ideal of keeping indolent harem girls who are highly trained to worship your man-meat.

So, the question that I have for you is, how's that working out for you? Do you keep or have you kept any of these girl(s)? If so, for how long? I for one would be interested in hearing your take on the practicality of putting your "code" into practice. What were some of the issues? Are any of your "odalisques" around to comment on this from the slave's point of view?

I don't want to come off as concescending John, but I have to tell you that it's fairly common for folks with little experience to start out with elaborate fantasies, many of which have the same "ring" as yours (e.g. the single minded focus of the slave on cock-worship 24/7). It looks like you've been working on yours a while. What most folks find though is that fantasies like that don't hold up so well in day-to-day life. If you were a vastly wealthy man of somewhat questionable ethics, keeping indolent women around who basically did nothing all day but groom themselves and await the arival of your divine member might work out OK, especially if she was one of many, and wasn't expecting you to interact with her every day. If you aren't, well, you're going to find pretty quick that a one-dimentional cock worshiper is going to get boring pretty quick, and probably be more trouble and expense than she's worth.

It's fine to have fantasies. Everyone does. But there's a time to stop fantasizing and find out what works, and what doesn't. Unless I'm missing the mark completely, I'd say that time is long overdue for you.

< Message edited by Leonidas -- 8/24/2009 3:08:44 AM >


_____________________________

Take care of yourself

Leonidas

(in reply to SassySarijane)
Profile   Post #: 202
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 3:19:29 AM   
Gentlemanjohn9


Posts: 46
Joined: 8/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble

quote:

'What do you make of this?'


What I make of it is much the same that I make of any fetish. It is no different than someone whose only purpose in life is to worship feet. It doesn't matter who the feet belong to so long as the feet of someone get's worshipped. It takes away the personality of both the master and slave and reduces life to nothing more than body parts. The cock and the cunt. Sure they go well together, and for a lot of folks they are made for each other, but in all things human, they are the least of things. 50% of men get ED after the age of 50. The cock goes flaccid, limp. It no longer works for the purpose for which it was intended. What then? What else but for the slave to move to another cock that does work. A cock that is worthy of worship instead of the limp used-to-be. It objectifies the man who would be Master, making him nothing more than a boneless appendage. There is no need for thought, originality, personality, or thoughtful progress. How can such breed anything but stagnation, boredom, dissatisfaction that their whole being is less, viewed as less, worth less than a single piece of meat that has a 50/50 chance of being fairly useless later in life. For short term fantasy's, whatever floats your boat but for long term relationships with meaning and the stuff and substance of life .. I just don't see it. When the only thing that grows is your cock, that doesn't leave much room to grow in your humanity. I rather feel sorry for the man whose cock is the tool for a cockwhore to get off on. I don't see how you can ever have such a person loyal to you.. anymore than someone whose only purpose in life is to worship your feet and should something tragic happen to your feet, off they go to the next someone who will allow them to worship the new feet.

Like I said before, it's a fleshy flogger .. perfect for the 'do-me' .. just 'do-me' in a different way and Master A's cock can't 'do-me', Master B's cock is just as good.

What I read from the site is a lot of crowing about the cock, so I can't help but think that the only people it will attract are pricks. ::shrugs::




Thanks. I actually share some of your concerns, but I do think you are probably expecting the odalisque Master/slave arrangement to provide the same things as a regular M/s arrangement, when in fact it offers something different. For a start, as I understand it the odalisque has only limited tenure in that role. The Master/slave relationship isn't permanent. A woman can only be an odalisque for a certain amount of time. That is of course fundamentally different to the usual M/s arrangement which is on-going. This is because it is recognized that the odalisque's role is somewhat limiting - although I think it looks like a much richer life than many people opn this thread imagine. In other places, like the yahoo groups, there seems to be a bit of female interest and women who like the idea. But not as a permanent arrangement. I recognize the noble ideals of the usual Master/slave relationship: loyalty, obedience, trust, sdelflessness etc. I don't think Code d' Odalisque is pitched at those same ideals. It is plainly hedonistic. I think it will only appeal to those who are comfortably hedonistic.


(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 203
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 3:33:08 AM   
Gentlemanjohn9


Posts: 46
Joined: 8/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist

BULLSHIT ALERT
I love history and meaningful communication. I like roleplaying, even playing pirates and capturing slaves. It truly sounds like a great play party theme. I like a lot of things in this world and not everything has to be my brand or flavor of BDSM.

However, I don’t like some fake BS about the history, origins or meaning of the very real odalisque harem rank. It all sounds so romantic, Kegels and all, but someone needs to call Penn & Teller to round up these Pirates of the Caribbean’s in their “Guild of the Black Pearl” for their next TV show called BULLSHIT.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BULLSHIT
The OP says, “It revives the institution of “odalisque” - the pleasure slave - and draws upon the sensual slave traditions of the Orient for its inspiration.”

TRUTH
The word "odalisque" is French in form and originates from the Turkish odalık, meaning "chambermaid". It’s Turkish and has nothing to do with sensual slave traditions or the Orient . . . there is no “institution” or “tradition” of pleasure to “revive”.

Reference: 8,365 etymology links
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BULLSHIT
The OP says, “An odalisque is a female slave who is preserved from labour and toil in order to devote herself to sexual service. She is not a cook or cleaner, not a maid or houseslave.”

TRUTH
An odalisque isn’t used sexually, she is the harem’s chambermaid. A chambermaid is a “maid” that physically “labors” to “clean” bedrooms and bathrooms.

MORE TRUTH
In a harem, if you fuck your odalisque, she isn’t and odalisque anymore! She is a concubine. If she bears a child, she is promoted to wife. If she bears the first born son, she is promoted to kadin, highest female rank in the harem unless the Sultans mother is present.

Reference: wiki odalisque
wiki harem
Dictionary chambermaid
Historical Cheat Sheet
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Does Capitan Jack Sparrow really need better maid service???

The “Guild of the Black Pearl” under the Code d’ Odalisque say “The core mission of the Guild is to seek and find the true odalisques of the world and to bring them to their proper vocation.” . . . which as you all know by now is chambermaids!

Reference: The Guild of the Black Pearl
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My grandfather was born in Constantinople Armenia, 1888. I have met real slaves that survived the Turkish genocide of the Armenians. I have also met Turkish slaves. I firmly believe that words have and must retain meaning or we would not be able to communicate. You can argue all day long about how much black or white is in gray but you cannot call black white. Bullshit definitions, false history and bad mislabeling is wrong and it can be dangerous.



In none of the Code d' Odalisque stuff that I've read have they ever made claims to be replicating historically accurate depictions of odaalique slavery. Somewhere on the website it explains this. It states quite plainly that Code d' Odalisque is based on *European imaginings* of Turkish odsalisque culture as per the Orientalist painters and travel writers. That is, the people who put the Code d' Odalisque together were admirers of Orientalist art rather than historical researchers. And I sort of like that. Sure, it is playing fast and loose with history, but it is a creative thing. (With respect, your Armenian background will tend to give you a grim view of all things Turkish... ) So we cannot judge it against history. It is, instead, a European fantasy. (Why is there so much hostility to fantasy here, by the way? Viva la imagination!)

(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 204
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 4:37:29 AM   
ResidentSadist


Posts: 12580
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: a mean old Daddy, but I like you - Joni Mitchell
Status: offline
Your OP didn’t give an inkling of an indication that you were creating a false fantasy history. You stated the history, meanings and origins of odalisque in a clear and matter of fact manner. To see your OP from our perspective, imagine I start a thread pronouncing that I was “reviving” a “tradition” and men will fulfill their role according to “traditions of the Orient”. Then I explain that men get sex changes so that if you are a man, you will have a pussy between your legs instead of a cock. Sounds like bullshit don’t it?

You and the society may well have been much better received if you had invented a new name for your imaginative fantasy. It might have faired better than rewriting the meanings and history of an existing harem rank and then spend the rest of the thread back peddling. Speaking of back peddling, that brings me to “Orientalist art” vs “sensual slave traditions of the Orient”. . . that is two entirely different statements and to try and pass one off as meaning the other is beyond an leap of semantics in my realm.

I am glad you mention art because I host a wealth of information about the history of belly dance, slavery and harems. Including the related art. Odalisque with a capitol letter “O” refers to many of those paintings and it warms my heart to think of them. The most famous, Grande Odalisque was commissioned by Napoleon’s sister. See link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grande_Odalisque

-=Belly Dancer Slave, a real nonconsensual slave=-
-=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, Shame on You=-
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gentlemanjohn9
quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist
BULLSHIT ALERT . . .

In none of the Code d' Odalisque stuff that I've read have they ever made claims to be replicating historically accurate depictions of odaalique slavery. Somewhere on the website it explains this. It states quite plainly that Code d' Odalisque is based on *European imaginings* of Turkish odsalisque culture as per the Orientalist painters and travel writers. That is, the people who put the Code d' Odalisque together were admirers of Orientalist art rather than historical researchers. And I sort of like that. Sure, it is playing fast and loose with history, but it is a creative thing. (With respect, your Armenian background will tend to give you a grim view of all things Turkish... ) So we cannot judge it against history. It is, instead, a European fantasy. (Why is there so much hostility to fantasy here, by the way? Viva la imagination!)


_____________________________

-=BDSM Book List=- Reading is Fundamental !!!
I give good thread.


(in reply to Gentlemanjohn9)
Profile   Post #: 205
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 4:50:26 AM   
BitaTruble


Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gentlemanjohn9


Thanks. I actually share some of your concerns, but I do think you are probably expecting the odalisque Master/slave arrangement to provide the same things as a regular M/s arrangement, when in fact it offers something different. For a start, as I understand it the odalisque has only limited tenure in that role. The Master/slave relationship isn't permanent. A woman can only be an odalisque for a certain amount of time. That is of course fundamentally different to the usual M/s arrangement which is on-going. This is because it is recognized that the odalisque's role is somewhat limiting - although I think it looks like a much richer life than many people opn this thread imagine. In other places, like the yahoo groups, there seems to be a bit of female interest and women who like the idea. But not as a permanent arrangement. I recognize the noble ideals of the usual Master/slave relationship: loyalty, obedience, trust, sdelflessness etc. I don't think Code d' Odalisque is pitched at those same ideals. It is plainly hedonistic. I think it will only appeal to those who are comfortably hedonistic.




Well, I don't understand what is meant by your OP then.

quote:

Today there are couples throughout the world who have adopted Code d’ Ode as a way of life.


If there are couples who have actually adopted this 'way of life', doesn't that speak to longevity and relationships? If you are part of a couple, why wouldn't things like loyalty and trust be part of that? Are you saying that within a completely hedonistic relationship, those things don't exist?

I guess I'm not seeing the point of calling yourself a 'couple' or saying this is a 'way of life' when it doesn't appear so. The OP seems to be in conflict with what you just wrote. Can you clarify it for me?

_____________________________

"Oh, so it's just like
Rock, paper, scissors."

He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."


(in reply to Gentlemanjohn9)
Profile   Post #: 206
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 5:18:48 AM   
Gentlemanjohn9


Posts: 46
Joined: 8/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Leonidas

Ok, seriously now John.

I provided some background on the terms you're using in your "code" early in the thread. I see nothing wrong with you wanting to keep a female slave or slaves in "harem girl" like fashion. Like I said early on, that's my preference too. I don't have any use for a pain-slut or a devotee of elaborate scene-play. I haven't read the website or manifesto that you keep quoting from and aluding to here, but it's fairly clear that you are enamoured of the romantic ideal of keeping indolent harem girls who are highly trained to worship your man-meat.

So, the question that I have for you is, how's that working out for you? Do you keep or have you kept any of these girl(s)? If so, for how long? I for one would be interested in hearing your take on the practicality of putting your "code" into practice. What were some of the issues? Are any of your "odalisques" around to comment on this from the slave's point of view?

I don't want to come off as concescending John, but I have to tell you that it's fairly common for folks with little experience to start out with elaborate fantasies, many of which have the same "ring" as yours (e.g. the single minded focus of the slave on cock-worship 24/7). It looks like you've been working on yours a while. What most folks find though is that fantasies like that don't hold up so well in day-to-day life. If you were a vastly wealthy man of somewhat questionable ethics, keeping indolent women around who basically did nothing all day but groom themselves and await the arival of your divine member might work out OK, especially if she was one of many, and wasn't expecting you to interact with her every day. If you aren't, well, you're going to find pretty quick that a one-dimentional cock worshiper is going to get boring pretty quick, and probably be more trouble and expense than she's worth.

It's fine to have fantasies. Everyone does. But there's a time to stop fantasizing and find out what works, and what doesn't. Unless I'm missing the mark completely, I'd say that time is long overdue for you.


These are quite thoughtful comments. Thanks. I have no direct experience of keeping an odalisque. My experience consists of numerous femsub relationships and a long traditional marriage. Recently divorced and therefore curious about the possibilities before me. My own inclinations are along the Code d' Odalisque line. For instance: not into pain, hetero. And at this stage I'm not looking for a heavy full-time emotional slash spiritual type of thing. A refined sexuality would be fine. Although not on a 24/7 basis. I have a large empty house (kids all grown up), pool, gardens, library, home theatre. Relationships are a hassle. Whores don't do it for me. I work an intense job. So a part-time indulgence in an odalisque fantasy with a well-trained odalisque who enjoys my hospitality several days a week might work, I was thinking. I'm perfectly prepared to admit that a serious Master/slave relationship that extends into all fields of life beyond sex would be far too much for me to take on. You see then, my interest? I correspond with people who *play* Code d' Odalisque but I have no direct experience. There are several yahoo groups which are quite active on Code d' Ode. One group has 300 or so females in it. I've corresponded with some. So I know for a fact that there are females for whom the idea appeals. And some say they are in relationships based on or similar to Code d' Odalisque and they report it works for them. I doubt any of them are in it 24/7 though. But Code d' Odalisque is really flexible in that regard and has a simple occlusion/sojourn device. That is, I'd consider keeping an odalisque "occluded" a few days a week. And within that, certainly I'd be looking to go with what works and learning from what doesn't. One previous relationship (years back) was a quite formal Master/servant arrangement. A part of me wants to revisit that. Aside from that I am interested in the Code d' Odalisque writings - full of ideas that interest me. Even wiithout a practical interest I'd be interested in the theory.

(in reply to Leonidas)
Profile   Post #: 207
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 5:32:19 AM   
Gentlemanjohn9


Posts: 46
Joined: 8/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist

Your OP didn’t give an inkling of an indication that you were creating a false fantasy history. You stated the history, meanings and origins of odalisque in a clear and matter of fact manner. To see your OP from our perspective, imagine I start a thread pronouncing that I was “reviving” a “tradition” and men will fulfill their role according to “traditions of the Orient”. Then I explain that men get sex changes so that if you are a man, you will have a pussy between your legs instead of a cock. Sounds like bullshit don’t it?

You and the society may well have been much better received if you had invented a new name for your imaginative fantasy. It might have faired better than rewriting the meanings and history of an existing harem rank and then spend the rest of the thread back peddling. Speaking of back peddling, that brings me to “Orientalist art” vs “sensual slave traditions of the Orient”. . . that is two entirely different statements and to try and pass one off as meaning the other is beyond an leap of semantics in my realm.

I am glad you mention art because I host a wealth of information about the history of belly dance, slavery and harems. Including the related art. Odalisque with a capitol letter “O” refers to many of those paintings and it warms my heart to think of them. The most famous, Grande Odalisque was commissioned by Napoleon’s sister. See link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grande_Odalisque

-=Belly Dancer Slave, a real nonconsensual slave=-
-=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, Shame on You=-
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gentlemanjohn9
quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist
BULLSHIT ALERT . . .

In none of the Code d' Odalisque stuff that I've read have they ever made claims to be replicating historically accurate depictions of odaalique slavery. Somewhere on the website it explains this. It states quite plainly that Code d' Odalisque is based on *European imaginings* of Turkish odsalisque culture as per the Orientalist painters and travel writers. That is, the people who put the Code d' Odalisque together were admirers of Orientalist art rather than historical researchers. And I sort of like that. Sure, it is playing fast and loose with history, but it is a creative thing. (With respect, your Armenian background will tend to give you a grim view of all things Turkish... ) So we cannot judge it against history. It is, instead, a European fantasy. (Why is there so much hostility to fantasy here, by the way? Viva la imagination!)



Other than it being a bit romantic (and orientalist) the phrase "slave traditions of the orient..." don't bother me and I certainly don't take them literally. But it is a fair enough designation. For a start, it signals a very different slave tradition than the racial system which prevailed in North America. And, in any case, it is not just the Ottomans that are relevant but slave traditions going all the way back to the Bible's King Solomon and others. I also point out that all the Code d' Ode material states clearly that its "imaginative recreation" of the old orient traditions is infused with modern hardcore Western sensibilities. Its a hybrid.

(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 208
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 5:55:04 AM   
Gentlemanjohn9


Posts: 46
Joined: 8/21/2009
Status: offline
If anyone is interested, as far as I can tell Code d' Odalisque has been around for maybe ten years and is mainly the work of an Australian guy named Steve Rose who is better known these days as a writer and practitioner on tantra in the self-help scene. All the same, others have picked it up and revised it and spread it around. It disappeared for a few years. Recently there has been a guy named Charles and his wife Julia from the UK promoting it.

(in reply to Gentlemanjohn9)
Profile   Post #: 209
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 7:04:35 AM   
Leonidas


Posts: 2078
Joined: 2/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gentlemanjohn9


I'm perfectly prepared to admit that a serious Master/slave relationship that extends into all fields of life beyond sex would be far too much for me to take on. You see then, my interest? I correspond with people who *play* Code d' Odalisque but I have no direct experience. There are several yahoo groups which are quite active on Code d' Ode. One group has 300 or so females in it. I've corresponded with some. So I know for a fact that there are females for whom the idea appeals. And some say they are in relationships based on or similar to Code d' Odalisque and they report it works for them. I doubt any of them are in it 24/7 though.



OH! I'm sorry John, I completely misjudged where you were coming from. So you'd like a woman to come over to your house and *play* "harem girl" from time to time. Perfectly doable, I reckon, if you find a willing playmate. I was sitting here scratching my head trying to understand how you were going to make this work when all you were really talking about is episodic play. Yeah, play is play, and just about whatever floats your boat is fair game as long as, again, you've got yourself a willing playmate.

In this new light, I think what you've posted is just as good as any fantasy scenario that is used as a backdrop for play as any I've seen. If harem girls do it for you, as opposed to, say, being the horny principal chasing the naughty school-girl around the desk, Go John!


< Message edited by Leonidas -- 8/24/2009 7:05:50 AM >


_____________________________

Take care of yourself

Leonidas

(in reply to Gentlemanjohn9)
Profile   Post #: 210
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 7:30:20 AM   
Missokyst


Posts: 6041
Joined: 9/9/2006
Status: offline
Once again, men have been doing this for years without the need to give it a fancy new made up term based loosely on european imagination.
Mistress
Call girl
Pay them for their time and they will worship what you want.
It does take money for the "upkeep" it takes to maintain the level of attractiveness you require. Plus, if you wish such an arrangement unless you look like Brad Pitt with a porn star cock between your legs, you better have the cash to make it an attractive proposition.
As for the 300 or so females on that yahoo group, I can tell you from my experience in running groups,
  • Some of those are duplicates, that is one person with 3 identities. 
  • Some of them are men (gasp, why would someone lie about a fantasy?!)
  • Most of them have never done squat but this stuff will appeal to them due to the bodice loving romance novels they have read and fantasize about but would never try. 
  • Some joined because they are list junkies
  • Some like to say they do things to make themselves seem exotic and important, much the same as people who grab the collar to feel special.

One of my lists had 200 members.  I probably met 100 of those, and of that 100, 50 were active in bdsm (and not all of those were into pain.. because guess what?  BDSM does not always include pain)
That is reality.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gentlemanjohn9

And at this stage I'm not looking for a heavy full-time emotional slash spiritual type of thing. A refined sexuality would be fine.

So a part-time indulgence in an odalisque fantasy with a well-trained odalisque who enjoys my hospitality several days a week might work, I was thinking.

One group has 300 or so females in it. I've corresponded with some. So I know for a fact that there are females for whom the idea appeals.

That is, I'd consider keeping an odalisque "occluded" a few days a week. And within that, certainly I'd be looking to go with what works and learning from what doesn't.

(in reply to Gentlemanjohn9)
Profile   Post #: 211
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 7:55:01 AM   
lustlyann2


Posts: 1
Joined: 8/7/2009
Status: offline
Thank you so much for posting this. T|his is exactly what i have been looking for and have always referred to myself as a sexual geisha who is artistic and sexually serving..focus on pleasing and eroticism... in a slave type manner but wanting so much to please without the torture.

(in reply to Gentlemanjohn9)
Profile   Post #: 212
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 8:07:48 AM   
Apocalypso


Posts: 1104
Joined: 4/20/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gentlemanjohn9
To draw attention to these resources free on line. That's all.
That's a valid goal.  And I hope you don't mind if I follow your lead and link to a useful resource.

More BDSM related information than you can shake a stick at!


_____________________________

If you're going to quote from the Book of Revelation,
Don't keep calling it the "Book of Revelations",
There's no "s", it's the Book of Revelation,
As revealed to Saint John the Divine.

(in reply to Gentlemanjohn9)
Profile   Post #: 213
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 8:59:38 AM   
leadership527


Posts: 5026
Joined: 6/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gentlemanjohn9
Leaving aside the infantile I am disappointed with the calibre of discussion here. My complaint is that it is so conspicuously self-centred. Post after post offers not much more than "Its not for me." Of course I knew it would not be for everybody from the outset. But I diodn't actually come here for a show of hands. I was hoping for intelligent dispassionate discussion.

This then may be the disconnect. In general, I have found it to be the course of wisdom to ALWAYS speak from the first person on this forum. You'll note that almost ALL my posts answer questions in the form of, "Well, Carol & I......" That's because, as you have found out, people get VERY VERY touchy when they perceive even the tiniest hint of "should" anywhere in something that is posted. So the only answer I could really give you about the code in general is, "Well, for Carol and I, it wouldn't fit well. Our dyanmic is very very pragmatic with almost no fantasy finery added to it. This is what appeals to us. So clearly a highly elaborate and largely fantasy based code won't serve us well." My expectation is that the moment I speculated beyond my own marriage, my post also would've generated a ton of knee-jerk response. Trying to actually discuss such a thing on this forum would be doomed to instant failure (as happened here). Sometimes, when I want to have such discussions, I use other means to do it. But I dont' do it here.

quote:

This is an appeal for some more dispassionate discussion. Set aside your personal tastes for a second and consider Code d' Odalisque (and the historical institution of the odalisque) dispassionately as another possibility within the wide spectrum of M/s lifestyles. That's all.

See above. It isn't going to happen here. This is the wrong place for it in my experience. It's not about the code itself, it's about damned near anything.


_____________________________

~Jeff

I didn't so much "enslave" Carol as I did "enlove" her. - Me
I want a joyous, loving, respectful relationship where the male is in charge and deserves to be. - DavanKael

(in reply to Gentlemanjohn9)
Profile   Post #: 214
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 9:20:48 AM   
Leonidas


Posts: 2078
Joined: 2/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Missokyst

Once again, men have been doing this for years without the need to give it a fancy new made up term based loosely on european imagination.
Mistress
Call girl
Pay them for their time and they will worship what you want.
It does take money for the "upkeep" it takes to maintain the level of attractiveness you require. Plus, if you wish such an arrangement unless you look like Brad Pitt with a porn star cock between your legs, you better have the cash to make it an attractive proposition.



Whoa, jaded much?  Yes, there are women who don't feel as though they can be full time slaves, but want the experience sometimes.  Yes, some of them prefer pure sexual domination to SM.  (edit: case in point "lustyann" a couple of posts up).  No, not all of them, or even most of them, require that you look like Brad Pitt.  Yes, some of them don't have pussies that would rival a Holstein, so they'd probably be more likely to want to charge if you were hung like a "porn star" than less. 

If Jim here is reasonably presentable, and sane, and stable, and honest in his desires and intentions, I'd be willing to bet he'll find a willing girl or two who are neither whores nor gold-diggers to play harem girl with him.  Something tells me that if Jim were a cross-dressing sissy boy who was looking for a little back-door strap-on action you'd probably be a little more supportive.  Something about a more "traditional" fantasy that gets your undergarments in a bind?

< Message edited by Leonidas -- 8/24/2009 9:28:12 AM >


_____________________________

Take care of yourself

Leonidas

(in reply to Missokyst)
Profile   Post #: 215
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 9:23:27 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

quote:



This is an appeal for some more dispassionate discussion. Set aside your personal tastes for a second and consider Code d' Odalisque (and the historical institution of the odalisque) dispassionately as another possibility within the wide spectrum of M/s lifestyles. That's all.


See above. It isn't going to happen here. This is the wrong place for it in my experience. It's not about the code itself, it's about damned near anything.


No, John, it's not.

You have something you think is cool. You aren't simply raising it--you're pushing it. Nor are you really being picked on much---oh trust me, you'll know when you are. You're whining because folks aren't chanting Hurrah for You in unison.

So play harem. Talk with others into it. You've invited the reaction primarily because you want to elevate a fantasy to an "-ism." But why should people "set aside [their] personal tastes" to consider yours?

It's a diverse world, John. That you're in it (along with a few friends) is fine. That you expect it to revolve around your kink is silly. And that you want to elevate this to a historical institution is an eye-roller.

And what's to "discuss"? You have a list of things your "institution" dictates. Discussion over.

Do some reflection, take a more realistic approach next time you post, and you'll get different results. In the meantime, if as you say you've found others of like mind, then your thread is accomplishing its purpose. What's the problem?

If the issue is instead your bruised ego, then you both deserve and will continue to receive a beating.

Think it over.


< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 8/24/2009 9:26:19 AM >

(in reply to leadership527)
Profile   Post #: 216
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 10:01:17 AM   
Missokyst


Posts: 6041
Joined: 9/9/2006
Status: offline
Did I say I had anything against being a Mistress or a call girl?  I find them to be very viable and honorable professions.   A need is required and met, and upkeep is required like it or not.  My objection came early on through this fantasy thread about his presumption that bdsm meant there would be pain required.  I know plenty of people who do not indulge in pain play.  You also brought out that the term Odalisque was a misnomer to which I agreed. 

What he is looking for is not a relationship, which would be implied by his promotion of that site.  He is looking for what lots of people look for, a fantasy fulfilled now and again.
He doesn't want to spend time to get to know them.  He only needs them to spend time worshiping at the alter of the cock.  Yes there are lots of women out there who are more than willing but I am going to predict most of those women also work to pay for the upkeep, bills, ect that happen in life.  The idea of being an odaliques is that their minds are solely preoccupied with sex.  Work is not part of the deal.  And if that would be the case then someone has to pay for upkeep.

This is not being jaded, it is being practical.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Leonidas

quote:

ORIGINAL: Missokyst

Once again, men have been doing this for years without the need to give it a fancy new made up term based loosely on european imagination.
Mistress
Call girl
Pay them for their time and they will worship what you want.
It does take money for the "upkeep" it takes to maintain the level of attractiveness you require. Plus, if you wish such an arrangement unless you look like Brad Pitt with a porn star cock between your legs, you better have the cash to make it an attractive proposition.



Whoa, jaded much?  Yes, there are women who don't feel as though they can be full time slaves, but want the experience sometimes.  Yes, some of them prefer pure sexual domination to SM.  (edit: case in point "lustyann" a couple of posts up).  No, not all of them, or even most of them, require that you look like Brad Pitt.  Yes, some of them don't have pussies that would rival a Holstein, so they'd probably be more likely to want to charge if you were hung like a "porn star" than less. 

If Jim here is reasonably presentable, and sane, and stable, and honest in his desires and intentions, I'd be willing to bet he'll find a willing girl or two who are neither whores nor gold-diggers to play harem girl with him.  Something tells me that if Jim were a cross-dressing sissy boy who was looking for a little back-door strap-on action you'd probably be a little more supportive.  Something about a more "traditional" fantasy that gets your undergarments in a bind?

(in reply to Leonidas)
Profile   Post #: 217
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 10:41:23 AM   
sweetgirlserves


Posts: 373
Joined: 4/14/2009
Status: offline
There is a yahoo group for this and I had read up on it a couple of months ago.  Although there were some appealing aspects to it at first, but the more i read about it, the more i was turned off.  The first is that the girl is really there to worship the cock... not the man to whom the cock belongs.  She is focused on the actual cock itself.. .nothing else... in her worship.     That just doesn't work at all for me.   

The second is... the girls can do basically nothing... they are not meant to do really much of anything besides sit around and pamper themselves.  That totally doesn't work for me either.

I think though... this really wasn't meant to be a lifestyle...  just 'play'... so if it provides a vanilla couple with some sexual excitement for a few hours... it's a good thing for them.



_____________________________

"I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel." ~Maya Angelou

(in reply to Missokyst)
Profile   Post #: 218
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 10:49:29 AM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sweetgirlserves

so if it provides a vanilla couple with some sexual excitement for a few hours... it's a good thing for them.



And there, madam, you have hit the nail squarely on the head.

(in reply to sweetgirlserves)
Profile   Post #: 219
RE: Code d' Odalisque - 8/24/2009 10:50:36 AM   
LillyoftheVally


Posts: 1826
Joined: 7/22/2009
Status: offline
If vanilla people are incorporating kink doesnt that by definition make them umm not vanilla?

_____________________________

'My doctor says that I have a malformed public-duty gland and a natural deficiency in moral fibre, and that I am therefore excused from saving Universes.'

Nah I am not happy to see you either

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 220
Page:   <<   < prev  8 9 10 [11] 12   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Code d' Odalisque Page: <<   < prev  8 9 10 [11] 12   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094