Esinn
Posts: 886
Joined: 6/23/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FullCircle quote:
Consider 2 of the greatest theist scholars of modern times Ken Miller & Francis Collins. They are now forced to admit evolution is a fact. This contradicts every word in Genesis. No ancient doctrine, parchment or scroll was found that suggested god gave us evolution or intended its creation story to be accepted only as a metaphor - yet they are forced to accept this fact or loose their career. Science filled the once infamous 'god-gap' the story of Genesis. It filled it with such veracity denial of it would mean metaphorical suicide for them. However, if they made the claims a few hundred years ago, 'god did it - evolution sucks' they would have been hailed as heroes. It the wrong modern place or ancient era saying evolution did it, not god could have ended badly The common argument to counter this is that you can only teach people that which they are capable of understanding. If evolution was included in the bible it would perhaps be beyond the questions they were searching for answers for at that point in time when the bible was written. You never read any text and it says the following paragraph is a metaphor. quote:
The reason any writing in the bible/Quran must be viewed as a 'story' by modern day man is just that. We are not ancient superstitious sand strewn men. We recognize, many of us, that most of the writings in the bible are non-rational claims of ancient people whose ignorance was truly not their fault. Those who wish to remain theist declare this as a metaphor or that as just a story. As we push forward it seems modern theists are turning much of early(ancient) religious absolutes into metaphors/stories so they can seem to remain rational. I suppose one of the things I'd question most about the bible is why an oracle of god hasn't produced an up dated version for the 21st century man to interpret. The biggest argument against such religious texts when using the 'we were only capable of understanding this at that point in time' argument is that somebody upstairs should have realised by now that we have far more complex questions these days. You can only get so much wisdom out of a nursery rhyme. quote:
Modern day thinking through critical examination has crushed most ancient thought to the point of no return - only 3(some say say 6) remain.. This is quite an accomplishment. It has been established almost to the point of absolute truth that those who still follow Mithra or Thoth with the same ferocious veracity as some do yhvh/Allah they do so at the risk of being labeled insane and locked away. Or at least being marginalized by intelligent people. It would not be 'socially' acceptable for the commander of the USS Enterprise(Aircraft Carrier - see pic) to demand his crew bow their heads and pray to Poseidon, Thetis or Oceanus each day before setting sail. These gods are the self proclaimed rulers of the seas. Yet, if the same person called upon the crew to pray to the meek and mild Jesus, although JC never directly laid claim to the ocean this would land public empathy. See how those 3 gods have been destroyed? Or consider Zeus and a meteorologist. I think what crushes ancient thought more than modern critical study is the vagueness of it; as time passes people start to fill in the blanks about what they believed to be the case regarding ancient gods. It's more or less impossible to worship such gods because our understanding of the rituals involved are limited to archaeologists and academics. This for me does not mean modern gods supersede ancient gods in terms of legitimacy. quote:
If the agenda of christianity is to market itself down the throats of highschool students and they do not follow the class outlines(which demand no personal 'religious' interpretation allowed), this might just be their objective , it is one of the most clean cut violations of church and state we have had in a bit. When that fight comes - 'they' are ready(Like god I will leave who "they" are a mystery). I will give them $100-200 though as should everyone. The problem is that finding out what is taught behind closed doors in various institutions around the country is not an immediate thing. By the time you realise what is going on perhaps two cycles of students have passed through the system and 60% of those will have a high gullibility rating. Teach people what they are able to understand? Come on, cornflake. We need to be reasonable. God can do whatever the hell it wants. Let me ask how you know this? How did you reach this logical conclusion? The bible, according to some talks about cosmology, exceptionally complicated mathematics(theories we know were not invented at that time). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntr6FJoVlu8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdhR9hXXi1M http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAps2CqtJpU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fw3do0TLv6o - hour long relevant(in some points) to discussion http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixQ0YGAAuas http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVhxL9AoF_w http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0XA25zGQFA So, your argument is pathetic, wrong and just as stupid as the bible. Look if you are going invent theories up as you go that is mighty religious of you. However, it defeats the purpose of having an intelligent discussing. I guess I agree with the rest of your post to degree which will warrant me saying nothing more than I sort of agree. Except for your last sentence. There have been multiple instances in this country where teachers have been fired or disciplined for for prostituting no wait I mean proselytizing, shit I do not know what I mean - their religion. For several hundred years, I have no exact numbers available at present, the bible was taught as an absolute fact in the vast majority of all verticals of education to innocent public school students. I am sure 3-4 cycles of students will not be harmful considering 'the whole'. This new law(or is it a bill) I dunno what to call it is very detailed, well written and specific. The .pdf or word format of it is plastered over the net. If it steps out of the bounds to which it is confined it instantly becomes illegal. All I can do is take them at their word at the moment. As mentioned I have seen blogs of science teachers who are very interested in leading this class. This class("elective") will not be forced but it is mandatory if 15 students desire it. As I initially said critical examination of any religion is a wonderful idea. If that is not the objective and this is some sort of social or marketing experiment then when evidence is available I see no reason every logical adult would not step in its way, unless the constitution is amended(Jesu no). As said before it will be one of the cleanest violations of Church & State out there. The class promoters of the bill choose their words, material and ideas very carefully as so not beak the current laws. We are getting WAY off track here. I was more interested in discussing this, looking at its wording specifically, hearing if anyone felt their school tried something similar, opinions if it is a good idea. . . So, with dat. That is all I wish to say. Thanks for the reply cornflake.
_____________________________
Let's break the law
|