DemonKia -> RE: Flaws (8/26/2009 11:14:54 AM)
|
FR, after continuing read thru & aimed at whoever the quote thingie says I'm replying to . . . . . First, I'd like to take a moment to acknowledge the wealth of perfectionistic attitudes that was displayed in this thread. In particular was the [sarcastic] obvious correlations between perfected writing forms & other career achievements . . . . . As online dwellers we should all understand that only perfect prose is worthy of believing or even reading for that matter, lol . . . ... [/sarcastic] [well, kinda sorta] Ah. & I note that those most displaying their expectations of 100% perfect correlations of this, that, or the other thing across many or even all areas seemed to be inviting misery in their doors with their perfectionistic attitudes . . . . Okay. Next: quote:
ORIGINAL: Prinsexx OK so let's assume that we culd take away a D type's 'changing' agenda. Isn't controlling a form of changing the other? Clarification about my statement: quote:
changing the other seems like an unrealistic expectation Let's contextualize this some; all is change. Things change, it is in the nature of the universe to evolve & shift & swirl . . . . . But. Expecting an other to change to benefit self, that's a very specialized form of change. Sometimes it works out that way, sometimes not. The other, the one needing that change from the perspective of self, may or may not recognize or desire to change in that particular way . . . .. If self is a D or M type & the other is an s type, & if the s type wants to change, then there may be movement towards change. May not be. Hell, many individuals would like to change this or that aspect of self & yet cannot, or cannot do it easily, quickly, effortlessly, or without other major change rippling thru their lives . . .. . . Is control a form of change? I want to say that they're related, but they have, to my mind, essential differences . . .. .. Connected but somewhat independent variables . . . . .. . quote:
ORIGINAL: Prinsexx Yes perfectionism sets an unobtainable standard so why try? why even attempt? Rhetorical questions by the way. (Gonna answer these, anyways, [;)] ) There is the ostensible & the actual. Outside of the context of that Buddha quote in my original reply to the OP, perfectionism mostly seems to exist in the realm of the ostensible. But its expectation has consequences in the actual, frequently these are those negative, 'failure' states: dejection, despondency, despair, giving up, apathy, & so on . . . . . & I have to suspect that sometimes, that's the goal of the perfectionist utterer, to inspire depression & failure, a goal engaged in a covert, subconscious manner . . . . . Similarly to how 'success' is an obviously desirable goal-state, & the stated desire of many who then turn around & engage in myriad 'failure' tactics. Ostensible & actual. Humans are such that, in a communication, in the heat of the moment, or in the eye of the desired, they may feel the need to posture as to their movements towards those desired states of being (success, perfection) & then, in the longer run, the actual emerges .. . . . Sometimes accompanied by all the verbiage 'smoothing' the way . . . . .. & then there was this: quote:
ORIGINAL: CaringandReal If I were a spychologist.... Good thing I'm not a spychologist, isn't it? That is the most awesome 'typo' . . . . . Mucho gracias por la favor. A 'spychologist'. That is gonna take some digesting, it's such a fabulous coinage . . . . . .
|
|
|
|