CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
Is using that slow/safe word not manipulating the session, or asking for a time out which is as said, manipulation? but then, if a sub/slave asks in a certain way for something which is ok to the Master is she then still trying to manipulate? why is it "just" asking? or am I getting too much in to semantics? Is it if s/he asks for something against the rules that it's manipulation? but doenst the slow/safe word slow down or stop whatever is going on which is breaking rules? To me, manipulation is -never- about directly -asking- for something. It is also not about providing additional information, whether or not it changes my original decision (part of being 'the boss' is being able to change my mind when better or different information makes that the best thing for me to do). Manipulation is when I say "no" or "this is the way it's going to be", and the servant either mopes or whines, or goes crying to one of our other family members, or sulks around, or uses other passive-aggressive means of attempting to turn the decision around and get what xhe wants, even when I've made my position clear. Directly -asking-, or using a pre-arranged safeword (for those who use them) isn't manipulation... it is directly and openly providing information for a decision... and I can -still- choose to continue or to decide, and the servant would abide my choice. The fact that I -won't-, for example, continue once a servant has said that xhe's uncomfortable with something happening in a scene is what enables us to develop trust... but the use of a safeword (or, in my case, any expression of the need to slow down or stop an activity, since I don't use safewords), or a servant asking for a favor isn't manipulation. Ok, I don't use "slow/safe" words -- so if someone says, in the midst of an activity, "hey, slow down" or "Whoa" or "NO" or "Owieowieowie", I'm going to slow down and check and see what's going on. Normally, I check off and on anyway, just by asking "Hey, you doing OK?", to which I may get a nod or a grunt or some kind of acknowlegement... or even a dazed look (which it is then my responsibility to interpret as "DANGER" or "ZONING", and which I need to know what "normal" looks like to be able to assess). I don't consider using a stopping word in a scene as "Manipulation" of the scene -- it is just a natural adjunct to doing intense, and sometimes dangerous things. It is something that comes about because people have fluctuations in what they can face at different times, and being "in charge" of a scene means, in my mind, being responsible for making sure that the activity stays positive for everyone, which includes making sure that one is not damaging one's bottom. To me, just -using- a safeword isn't "manipulation", it is just providing information on which I can base a decision about the safety and health of the bottom. Now, as far as the issue of 'manipulation' and safeword use, where it borders on manipulation might occur in a situation where I had a bottom that was constantly hollering "Stop" or "no" after just a couple of strikes or pricks or before we made a single cut, even after originally saying that xhe wanted to participate in the activity in question... but this is one of those 'devil in the details' situations, because what I would be asking myself is whether this person -really- wanted to do that activity at all... sometimes, a servant will think they can do something out of the desire to please a Keeper, but will discover, inadvertently, that xhe's not ready, once it comes time to get down to brass tacks, and will use the safeword as a tool to try to keep from doing something that xhe found out that xhe couldn't just "suck up". Whether this is "manipulation" or not really depends on whether xhe comes clean when I ask hir whether xhe ever plans on being able to go through with the activity, or whether xhe's discovered that it's just too much for hir. If xhe continues, say, four or five times to use this technique, then, for me, it's slid down that slippery slope of "manipulation", because I already know, by this point, that xhe isn't going to do what xhe said xhe was going to do. If this is someone for whom my -only- relationship with them revolves around this activity, then chances are pretty good that we're not going to have a relationship after a few times of this happening, just because to me, this looks like we're not compatible. If we have other things besides this that enter into our relationship, I just take this activity off the "to do" list for now, and move it to the "try later" list -- or sometimes to the "never again" list... and that's OK and doesn't really impact my overall relationship with that servant, just because xhe can't bottom for this activity. Dame Calla
< Message edited by CallaFirestormBW -- 8/29/2009 5:45:35 PM >
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|