Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
In the link I posted earlier there was a large discrepancy from the Bush White House projections and the CBO's projections Once again making the Bush Presidency the 'standard' for considering the Obama Presidency "better"? Has your desperation set in that deep? That said, your problem with this argument is that the reality of the circumstance that occurred in 2001 make discussion of any discrepancy, real or necessary for a political rationalization, a non issue. Had the Bush Administration had the same 8 months of Washington residency and the discrepancy was as dramatic without 9/11 you'd be making a point. However reality happened, and nothing that transpired in the 8 months after 9/11 was in the projection of the CBO or the Bush White House. I appreciate your attempt; but the period of time post 9/11 does not have any similarity to the eight months of this Administration. quote:
In fact, I have provided those sources on more than one occasion and you just continue the argument as if the proof does not exist. Living in the past works for you but not me. Unfortunately, the 9/11 'what if' happened making any prior projection irrelevant to comparison to January 2009 - August 2009 when NOTHING occurred that wasn't under the control of the Obama Administration and his political party. Address those facts and point to a relevant fact from 2001 and we'll have something to discuss. Speaking of today's reality. I find it most interesting that the total deficit number, either the CBO's or the resubmitted one from the White House, both are record setting without a work out plan. Since you aren't even arguing both are wrong, if nothing else it serves to end the debate that "Obama is a fiscal conservative". Projecting such failure to balance the budget for the next few generations indicates fiscal suicide.
|