NihilusZero
Posts: 4036
Joined: 9/10/2008 From: Nashville, TN Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: eponavet I dunno...i mean, i'm from Florida. it's my opinion that it is cold when it gets below 60 degrees out. And i feel cold, shiver etc. when it gets below 60 degrees out. But i'm quite sure that someone from say - Canada - would be of the opinion that 60 degrees is quite warm. Balmy even.... Who is right? Both of you. You're using a subjective example. You may as well be arguing over which color is the coolest. With topics such as these, sure, everything is varying opinion. Somethings more than others. Music, for instance, is a gray area. Whether someone thinks X music is better than Y is opinion although the musicianship and talent of X and Y can be more objectively assessed and compared. quote:
ORIGINAL: eponavet And aren't both those opinions based on our experiences, facts even (the actual temperature - i'm not saying i'm of the opinion that 60 degrees is actually 32 degrees and freezing - although i may whine something to that effect when i'm cold...) that helped formulate each of our opinions? Sure. But your feeling it's 54 degrees outside and my feeling it's 61 can each be measured on how accurate they are to reality. It doesn't change whether it still feels cold or not to each of us, but it gives us the actual information. quote:
ORIGINAL: eponavet If you aren't going to call them opinions, what word are you going to use? (You mention above that ideas with framework inside them merit a better word. I'm sincerely asking what that word is) In this example? Guesses of just personal expressions. I get cold easily. I frankly couldn't care if someone else thinks it's just dandy outside if I'm freezing my butt off no matter what the thermometer says! quote:
ORIGINAL: eponavet I think my example above is more realistic than yours about me being from Saturn.....  Exactly! Some examples ("opinions") are better than others...usually based on their realistic probability. then we get into all the juicy details of how we determine probability, though (and statistics can get overwhelming really quick). quote:
ORIGINAL: eponavet No problem....i'm not sure why you respond sacracstically as though you don't understand or as though i am attacking you when i'm debating concepts and ideas and expanding my views through debate. Fair enough. It's not personal, though. I can get clinical and pointed during debate. I'll try to keep it a bit more lighthearted if it hasn't seemed that way thus far. quote:
ORIGINAL: eponavet I'm now responding to you differentiating a view from a belief by attaching emotional requirements to the latter. And i am of the opinion that both can have emotional facets and neither is mutually exclusive or valid/invalid based on those emotional aspects....i am also interested in differing opinions that help shape or solidify my own, so thanks for the input (sans the sarcastic, condescending parts.... ...) It's been enlightening for me to think deeper on the linguistics as well as the concepts within this discussion. Wait...did that count as sarcasm? I would still say that grouping them both together as being able to be prone to emotional investment just means we're semantically moving the goalposts. My main concern is with X where X is a thought held tight because the person needs it (emotionally), regardless of what term we use to describe X.
< Message edited by NihilusZero -- 9/10/2009 9:45:48 PM >
_____________________________
"I know it's all a game I know they're all insane I know it's all in vain I know that I'm to blame." ~Siouxsie & the Banshees NihilusZero.com CM Sex God du Jour CM Hall Monitor
|