Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
No id? You mean like qualifying to be part of the security force for the US Embassy in Kabul? "One recruit was allegedly hired even though he had no identification, not even a driver's license, to prove who he was." The State Dept didn't have a problem with that occurring, so why would a different Fed agency have a problem with people getting free medical care without proof that they qualify? It isn't that surprising. Orion, Those responsible for vetting are too busy interrogating CIA operative who tortured poor defenseless religious individuals at GITMO. Who has time to investigate embassy personal? Where are your priorities, damn it?! quote:
ORIGINAL: kittinSol This makes me wonder how medical ethics and the Hippocratic Oath should be dealt with, according to those who are finding yet a new reason to be against health reform (I note that seemingly every week, a new argument replaces the old one, as myths and lies are debunked on a regular basis). So which is it in the case of this Bill not having any verification and enforcement; a "lie" or "myth"? I'm confident in your ability to debunk such matters with ease. Please do so. The issue isn't medical oaths, although any doctor would be as likely to walk away from a person having a seizure in front of them versus treating them due to the likelihood of resulting litigation, the issue is a representation made by the President on Wednesday night and the resulting outcry of him being called on it. This isn't a "new reason" it is among the reasons that have been discussed and addressed. Evidence being the proposed amendment and subsequent vote against enforcement being discussed. quote:
Should a doctor refuse to treat a patient because s/he didn't have the right paperwork? 83% of the US population says yes they should refuse. However, feel free to become a physician and volunteer at a clinic of your choice.
|