Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 10:29:40 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Glad that is on the record now, so the other debate you are having will move past that ;).


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY


quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

Firm, the middle of a speech to congress is not the appropriate place to make such a statement, unless they are using political theater to manuever with.

I don't disagree, Orion.

Firm


_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 10:30:39 AM   
Arpig


Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: Increasingly further from reality
Status: offline
quote:

A 15 year old walks in a bar and orders a beer. There is a law on the books stating that anyone under 21 should not be sold a drink. The bartender is no authority to ask for and verify an ID prior to service. Currently that is how the health care bill reads regarding the issue. That is the truth behind Senator Wilson's accusation. President Obama would prefer this died for that truth not to get out.
You mean to tell me that they don't card people at bars in the US? I find that hard to believe. And under this plan, wouldn't people on the public plan have a card just like any other insurance,a card they show so the hospital/doctor knows who to bill?


_____________________________

Big man! Pig Man!
Ha Ha...Charade you are!


Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs?

CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran


(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 10:43:22 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

quote:

A 15 year old walks in a bar and orders a beer. There is a law on the books stating that anyone under 21 should not be sold a drink. The bartender is no authority to ask for and verify an ID prior to service. Currently that is how the health care bill reads regarding the issue. That is the truth behind Senator Wilson's accusation. President Obama would prefer this died for that truth not to get out.
You mean to tell me that they don't card people at bars in the US? I find that hard to believe. And under this plan, wouldn't people on the public plan have a card just like any other insurance,a card they show so the hospital/doctor knows who to bill?




No Arpig, that was the point. We DO card people in the US as the first line of enforcement of existing laws to insure the individual qualifies to buy a drink.

Under any version of the pending health care legislation there would be no similar requirement to proof eligibility. Remember there is no standard US picture ID card. Our Social Security cards haven't been updated to include even basic bar coding, since they were introduced in 1936. Fraudulent SS cards are common, however not even this basic, and piratically meaningless (commonly you need a SS AND another form of ID to get the most basic of government services or even a drivers license in the US), requirement shows up under enforcement. Many other government entitlement programs currently have enforcement and eligibility verification, pointing to some agenda being exposed when its be deliberately excluded in this instance.

Obviously this isn't part of curtailing the $500 Billion in fraud reference by the President.

< Message edited by Mercnbeth -- 9/11/2009 10:46:47 AM >

(in reply to Arpig)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 10:48:43 AM   
SpinnerofTales


Posts: 1586
Joined: 5/30/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY


Keep spinning, Spinner.

The topic at hand isn't about "Death panels". It's about Wilson's exclamation, and the fact that he was apparently following Obama's own advice.

The "That's a lie!" interjection was in reference to Obama's claim that the proposed health care plan couldn't be used by illegal immigrants.

I understand you wish to change the focus of the discussion, because your case is weak on the issue, but I'm not interested.

Thanks, though.

Firm


But in one posting you let the "death panel" issue be raised by quoting it. In the next you whine about how it the left's fault that you lie because "the left started it" and defend it at length. I didn't notice much "I don't want to talk about death panels" talk there. Now suddenly, when you are backed into the corner of either showing yourself untruthful or uninformed, suddenly you don't feel like talking. This from a man who has questioned my honesty and my manhood because of my citations of the websites from which you take your news. If you don't want subjects discussed, stop bringing them up.

I still stand with my question: You in your postings on this thread have used quotes with the term Government Death Panel. Do you believe such panels exist or not? It's an easy question. I'll even go first. I don't believe Government Death Panels were ever a part of this legislation. Now it's your turn.

oh..and by the way, "Alinsky"....it has nothing to do with the disucssion but it becomes a habit to throw it in at every opportunity, doesn't it?

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 10:53:31 AM   
SpinnerofTales


Posts: 1586
Joined: 5/30/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth


Under any version of the pending health care legislation there would be no similar requirement to proof eligibility. Remember there is no standard US picture ID card. Our Social Security cards haven't been updated to include even basic bar coding, since they were introduced in 1936. Fraudulent SS cards are common, however not even this basic, and piratically meaningless (commonly you need a SS AND another form of ID to get the most basic of government services or even a drivers license in the US), requirement shows up under enforcement. Many other government entitlement programs currently have enforcement and eligibility verification, pointing to some agenda being exposed when its be deliberately excluded in this instance.

Obviously this isn't part of curtailing the $500 Billion in fraud reference by the President.



Ok, Merc..I will admit that I'm not a big follower of illegal alien issues. Can you fill me in a bit on places to look to see a) what ID will be needed to get into any private or public health option if this legislation is passed and B) where it says that anyone, without any proper id can get into a plan and recieve helathcare?

I'd like to study up before I decide and decide before I speak. I know some might find it strange but I'm confident you'll understand that process.

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 11:04:33 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

I will admit that I'm not a big follower of illegal alien issues. Can you fill me in a bit on places to look to see a) what ID will be needed to get into any private or public health option if this legislation is passed and B) where it says that anyone, without any proper id can get into a plan and receive helathcare?

Spinner - Repeating....

There is no language pertaining to enforcement or requiring an ID.

quote:

the lack of a specific verification mechanism constitutes a loophole that would allow illegal immigrants to get benefits despite the legal prohibition. Republican Rep. Dean Heller of Nevada proposed an amendment to the bill that would have required the use of the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements program to check the citizenship of anyone applying for federal coverage or affordability credits. SAVE is the program used by Medicaid and similar entitlement programs. That amendment was voted down along party lines by the House Ways and Means Committee.


quote:

Democrats Vote Against Making Sure Illegal Aliens Don�t Get Subsidized Health Insurance

Democrats voted against an amendment offered by Rep. Dean Heller (R-NV) to better screen applicants for subsidized health care to ensure they are actually citizens or otherwise entitled to it. The underlying bill is insufficient for the purpose of preventing illegal aliens from accessing the bill’s proposed benefits, as it does not provide mechanisms allowing those administering the program to ensure illegal aliens cannot access taxpayer-funded subsidies and benefits.


BTW - that was a Newsweek banner headline - not mine.


< Message edited by Mercnbeth -- 9/11/2009 11:07:49 AM >

(in reply to SpinnerofTales)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 11:17:06 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
No id? You mean like qualifying to be part of the security force for the US Embassy in Kabul?

"One recruit was allegedly hired even though he had no identification, not even a driver's license, to prove who he was."

The State Dept didn't have a problem with that occuring, so why would a different Fed agency have a problem with people getting free medical care without proof that they qualify? It isn't that surprising.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 11:21:17 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
This makes me wonder how medical ethics and the Hippocratic Oath should be dealt with, according to those who are finding yet a new reason to be against health reform (I note that seemingly every week, a new argument replaces the old one, as myths and lies are debunked on a regular basis).

Should a doctor refuse to treat a patient because s/he didn't have the right paperwork?

_____________________________



(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 11:26:35 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
The do so if you cannot pay, so not much difference there. They already do so if you do not have the right forms if you are part of Medicare, Medicaid, or Private Insurance. No change there. The only place that does not refuse are emergency rooms, and that is part of the problem with not everyone having health care. People are going to ER's for cold, minor flu, and things such as that. I had an idea a long time ago that there should be a state run free clinic next to each ER.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 11:32:16 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
we have a Walk in clinic attached to my local hospital, and it runs up until I think 9pm most days. It has taken a huge load from the ER especially after regular working hours.
But we need our healthcards to access care.
Lucy


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 11:32:40 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

No id? You mean like qualifying to be part of the security force for the US Embassy in Kabul?
"One recruit was allegedly hired even though he had no identification, not even a driver's license, to prove who he was."
The State Dept didn't have a problem with that occurring, so why would a different Fed agency have a problem with people getting free medical care without proof that they qualify? It isn't that surprising.
Orion,
Those responsible for vetting are too busy interrogating CIA operative who tortured poor defenseless religious individuals at GITMO. Who has time to investigate embassy personal? Where are your priorities, damn it?!

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol
This makes me wonder how medical ethics and the Hippocratic Oath should be dealt with, according to those who are finding yet a new reason to be against health reform (I note that seemingly every week, a new argument replaces the old one, as myths and lies are debunked on a regular basis).


So which is it in the case of this Bill not having any verification and enforcement; a "lie" or "myth"? I'm confident in your ability to debunk such matters with ease. Please do so.

The issue isn't medical oaths, although any doctor would be as likely to walk away from a person having a seizure in front of them versus treating them due to the likelihood of resulting litigation, the issue is a representation made by the President on Wednesday night and the resulting outcry of him being called on it.

This isn't a "new reason" it is among the reasons that have been discussed and addressed. Evidence being the proposed amendment and subsequent vote against enforcement being discussed.

quote:

Should a doctor refuse to treat a patient because s/he didn't have the right paperwork?
83% of the US population says yes they should refuse. However, feel free to become a physician and volunteer at a clinic of your choice.

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 11:39:24 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
83% of the US population says yes they should refuse.


Finally, a real death panel emerges!

_____________________________



(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 11:42:58 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
83% of the US population says yes they should refuse.


Finally, a real death panel emerges!

Are you saying the representation made by the President that no undocumented workers will be covered by the health care bill puts him behind supporting a "real death panel"?

The President represented the bill stands behind the will of those 83% you represent as "death panel" supporters.

Very surprising to see you document such a drastic change about how you view this President. Now he's a death panel supporter in your eyes because he stood in front of the people on Wednesday and said not one dollar from the health care bill would go to paying for coverage for undocumented workers.

< Message edited by Mercnbeth -- 9/11/2009 11:46:58 AM >

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 11:45:53 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
No, what is surprising is that the irony eludes you, who likes to think of himself as such a master of sarcasm.

Very surprising  !

_____________________________



(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 11:50:47 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

No, what is surprising is that the irony eludes you, who likes to think of himself as such a master of sarcasm.

Very surprising  !
I never claimed to be anything but ignorant to your thought process; now more than ever. Where's the irony in the President's statement? Or was the part I missed intended "sarcasm" in your initial representation that denying coverage to those here illegally amounted to the support of "death panels".

Help!

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 11:57:49 AM   
Arpig


Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: Increasingly further from reality
Status: offline
No need to quote your citation, so I won't. It seems you are right, while everybody may have to show a card to get treated,apparently there is no requirement to show ID to get that card. Here in Ontario you have to show a picture ID and a birth certificate or a certificate of citizenship as well as proof of residency to get an OHIP (our health plan) card.

Personally I think that Heller's plan makes perfect sense and am amazed that a provision such as his is not already in the bill....it seems simple common sense. Heller should take Obama up on his offer, he said his door was open and he was willing to entertain any reasonable idea...well Heller's idea is certainly reasonable,especially as the system he proposes is already in use for Medicare/Medicaid (I've never understood the difference, but that's no never mind).

I just sent him an Email to that effect,and I urge all of you out there to do the same.


< Message edited by Arpig -- 9/11/2009 12:11:14 PM >


_____________________________

Big man! Pig Man!
Ha Ha...Charade you are!


Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs?

CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran


(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 12:07:13 PM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

It seems you are right, while everybody may have to show a card to get treated,apparently there is no requirement to show ID to get that card. Here in Ontario you have to show a picture ID and a birth certificate or a certificate of citizenship as well as proof of residency to get an OHIP (our health plan) card.


Appreciate that Arpig - Thanks.

You also raise a good point and question. The same requirement you have in Ontario exists in every country currently having any form of nationalized health care.

Why do you think any attempt to do something similar regarding any of the health care Bills being considered has been rejected?

It may be premature to point to which individual or individuals "screwed up" regarding this issue.

(in reply to Arpig)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 12:16:38 PM   
Arpig


Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: Increasingly further from reality
Status: offline
quote:

Why do you think any attempt to do something similar regarding any of the health care Bills being considered has been rejected?
Well it may have something to do with wanting to leave a loophole for illegals, but I suspect it was either a desire to prevent a government intrusion into one's privacy (i.e. having to prove you are an American) or it was partisanship pure and simple. Now given that the program is already in use and given the party of the nay-sayers in question's fondness for bureaucratic intrusion into people's lives I lean heavily toward the latter.

I think you (by which I mean you American members of CM) all should send an email to Obama urging him to revive Heller's amendment, and to urge all those you know to do so as well. You never know, enough letters, emails and Tweets might just get his attention.


< Message edited by Arpig -- 9/11/2009 12:18:10 PM >


_____________________________

Big man! Pig Man!
Ha Ha...Charade you are!


Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs?

CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran


(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 12:25:24 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
In Wisconsin a 15 year old can drink in a bar, if his parents are with him. It is legal but is also up to the discretion of the bartender. In most cases they are served though.

(in reply to Arpig)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up - 9/11/2009 1:09:13 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

WSJ Critiques the president's speech -

quote:

Medicare for Dummies

Contradictions worthy of the Marx Brothers.

The thing about the bully pulpit is that Presidents can make the most fantastic claims and it takes days to sort the reality from the myths. So as a public service, let's try to navigate the, er, remarkable Medicare discussion that President Obama delivered on Wednesday. It isn't easy.

Mr. Obama began by depicting a crisis in the entitlement state, noting that "our health-care system is placing an unsustainable burden on taxpayers," especially Medicare. Unless we find a way to cauterize this fiscal hemorrhage, "we will eventually be spending more on Medicare than every other government program combined. Put simply, our health-care program is our deficit problem. Nothing else even comes close."

On this score he's right. Medicare's unfunded liability—the gap between revenues and promised benefits—is currently some $37 trillion over the next 75 years. Yet the President uses this insolvency as an argument to justify the creation of another health-care entitlement, this time for most everyone under age 65. It's like a variation on the old Marx Brothers routine: "The soup is terrible and the portions are too small." 

(Full article here).


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: When they all agree, you know you screwed up Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109