DavanKael -> RE: So when did America become a "Chrisitian" country (9/13/2009 10:20:15 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote:
ORIGINAL: DavanKael Also, relevant to someone's later post, CE does not stand for Christian Era, it stands for Common Era and BCE is Before the Common Era, assuming I am remembering this information from nearly 20 years ago (Still not the 18th century) when I took my first Philosophy class. Davan http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Christian+Era?db=luna Hi, PoliteSub53---- I am not sure if you are meaning to prove or disprove what I said. Your reference heads off with 'Christian Era' but if you reference later on the page is says something akin to "See: Common Era". If you want to be secular BCE and CE are the ways to go. And, yes, to those who are arguing the nuances of years, the whole birth and death of Jesus (Assuming such a guy existed) is all FUBAR in terms of time and calendars but I can not believe that people are actually arguing that the adoption of Christianity by the "Holy Roman Emperor" didn't inextricably (To this point...one can dream for some point in the future) join Christianity in a very important way to Western Culture. And, thus, the re-writing and over-writing of so-many things commenced in earnest. People are arguing against nuances that simply are Christian in lean; it's not unreasonable that a culture dominated by a particular religion has evidence of said religion all over the place that people take for granted but for people to argue that Christianity does not still pervade American culture is baffling. Do kids get off of school for Saturnalia? No, but schools are certainly closed for Christmas. That's just one example. And, I don't believe that the 'vestiges' such as the use of AD are innocuous if someone is desiring to be secular; we have to think of where what we're using is coming from and if there is something that serves us better. I argue in favor of true separation of church and state because I do not believe that someone else's religion (Or even my own, if I had one) should dictate societal laws but to live that assertion rather than simply to make it, I must behave accordingly, and in this instance, it's pointing out the subtle bias of Christianity that still remains in things that many very intelligent people simply accept as meaningless...and, of course, not behaving in ways as to feed into the remaining religiousity (Let alone the overt stuff) when I can reasonably avoid doing so. Davan
|
|
|
|