Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Paradox ??


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Paradox ?? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/15/2009 5:51:07 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
little wonder it's a fuckin paradox, to my thinking

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/15/2009 5:55:20 PM   
Andalusite


Posts: 2492
Joined: 1/25/2009
Status: offline
He does things that meet my needs, and I do things that meet his. We *both* want to be happy! I don't see any paradox involved.

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/15/2009 6:08:29 PM   
sexisubi


Posts: 373
Joined: 11/23/2008
Status: offline
i do what i am told because i trust the person who is telling me to do it. no one has complete control over anyone unless you let them, its a matter are you able to let them.

i guess i will use a quick example. i party with a punk crowed, they go to punk shows, skateboard jump off roofs get really waisted always getting hurt.. blah blah blah. well this guy asked me to help a friend off the roof,  who was really drunk and laying down, knowing he wasnt going to listen to me i still said it hey dont fall asleep up here you could fall and hurt yourself. i got this response 'dont tell me what to do,' this guy and i arent really friends we know eachothers names and party thats it. a girl he works with that he knows really well comes up and tells him the same, immediately he gets up and gets off the roof to a couch and falls asleep.

the one thing that always concerns me is if the rule/order/ thing that is asked is hard am i going to be able to do it when they are and are not around? after i ask myself this question i try to find ways to do it when im alone anyway (whatever it is, im being pretty broad here.) i also express the concern to them, they cant make me do something, no one can make me do something, but doing it makes them happy, and if they are happy then i am happy.






_____________________________

bound by love,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIvvaqUdDm8

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/16/2009 12:14:58 AM   
MaamJay


Posts: 2101
Joined: 9/2/2005
Status: offline
As I've said a few times recently, for Me it's not submission unless there is a willingness to go out of their comfort zone (that's NOT equal to breaking hard limits) occasionally. Only when there's some "cost" involved is it submission, the rest of the time it's serving in ways that they like and I love! I'm not the sort who takes pleasure in seeing them out of their comfort zone all the time, most of the time I get My pleasure from theirs. But they do need to be willing to follow where I lead and just sometimes it will be down a path they're not that eager to walk down. If they do it ... there's usually a reward at the end that they never saw coming. If they don't ... that's usually game over for I perceive it as a lack of trust in Me ... and I lose faith and interest in them.

OP, I know you have the best interests in your girl at heart, but just as when raising a child you sometimes have to be cruel to be kind (in the right measure) to teach a very important lesson, so sometimes there's a need to ask more of your sub and lead them to challenge some inner thinking. Don't be afraid to go there occasionally.

Maam Jay aka violet[A]

_____________________________

Life is a song ... and I love singing it! (By me!)

(in reply to UKEvolutionary)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/16/2009 12:40:52 AM   
Acer49


Posts: 1434
Joined: 8/7/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: UKEvolutionary

I have done years of "research" into BDSM and in particular, D/s - M/s, and have had one "on-line" experience and only recently, one REAL life experience. I have to ask this !! And please bear in mind that this is "Lifestyle" and not just "Bedroom kink" !!

A Dom/me does "things" for His / Her submissive to satiate their needs, and for that, the Dom/me gets their satisfaction.

If the Dom/mes "purpose" is to fullfill the needs of their submissive for their own delight, who's REALLY " In charge" ?? I KNOW the Dom/me is "supposed" to be, but there lies the Paradox !!!

And just for the record, I will, and want to do the BEST I can for "My girl" as that is the thing that pleasures Me the most !!

Opinions please ?


While I do enjoy making my slave happy, I do not think satiate would be the correct term
Keeping my slave happy is just one of my purposes. The Dominant is still in charge as it is his/her choice as to where when and how much of the needs will be filled at any given time. The power structure does not change just because the dominant is a nice person



< Message edited by Acer49 -- 9/16/2009 12:41:42 AM >


_____________________________

Never be bullied into silence. Never allow yourself to be made a victim. Accept no one's definition of your life; define yourself.
Harvey Fierstein

(in reply to UKEvolutionary)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/16/2009 1:34:32 AM   
lally2


Posts: 2621
Joined: 4/16/2009
Status: offline
im in the position of being able to compare between a relationship where my physical and emotional needs were pretty much off the map and a relationship where my physical and emotional needs are being so completely met that for the past couple of days ive been doing an awful lot of cathartic crying.  ive even come out with a stinking cold and i know its a manifestation of all the stuck chi inside of me because i never go down with disgusting colds.

i am a human being and i have feelings, needs, a desire to love life and enjoy every aspect of who i am as a thinking, feeling, sentient being.  it is my right to have those feelings, i was born to have those feelings they are mine.  becoming someones slave doesnt suddenly mean that i stop being who i am and i stop needing to feel the things i need to feel.

if a Master wants all of who his slave or sub is, if He wants her to give Him everything and not to be an automaton then tapping into her emotions, making her feel cherished, valued and desired gives her the opportunity to give all of herself, all, every last little ounce of herself, isnt that what you want.  absolute enslavement not just of her head but of her heart and spirit.

it isnt a paradox atall.  my Master enjoys giving me pleasure, its what gives him pleasure.  last night he was trying to think up ways of coming down here to look after me with this disgusting cold.  He said he wanted to put me to bed, cuddle me and stroke my hair till i fell asleep.  im His cherished possession, His creature  and Him wanting so much to look after me made me feel more than the sum of my parts, more than arse, tits and a cunt - i am His totally even when im snotty and sneezing all over the place.

but He also wants to whip me till i cry and if i feel awkward and embarrassed about something thats too bad.  so cool!



_____________________________

So all I have to do in order to serve him, is to work out exactly how improbable he is, feed that figure into the finite improbability generator, give him a fresh cup of really hot tea ... and turn him on!

(in reply to Acer49)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/16/2009 2:34:02 AM   
daintydimples


Posts: 967
Joined: 7/6/2009
Status: offline
A power exchange is only a paradox if you see it as a one way exchange. In a good dynamic, the power does not flow one way, it's circular. On some level, the s-type is empowered by giving up power.




_____________________________

Some soften by the forced reflection that comes from loss; others harden. Which are you?




(in reply to lally2)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/16/2009 5:09:03 AM   
katrinka


Posts: 4
Joined: 3/3/2008
Status: offline
What caught my attention here is "Both focus on the needs of the Dominant" -

I don't know about how long that can stay good and healthy; a good relationship is about everyone's needs being met as well as possible.... and ultimately d/s IS a relationship between two people. 

In order to get the best out of me, it is in his best interests to make sure my needs are met.  In order for him to be the best he can be, it is important to meet his needs.  In fact - the best partnerships are borne out of both partners doing their very best at this - this makes for happy, healthy contented people. 

Finally - simply in the roles of d/s M/s - if he expects to be able to push me over a cliff, to cede all power and to tear me apart it is vital that he be there for the catching, holding, and comforting - to help me grow in the way that pleases him best.  Perhaps in the end he does this for his own pleasure, but he views his mastery s a service, and my submission as a gift.  Honestly, I don't view my submission as a gift - in my opinion, he does all the hard work which allows me the freedom I enjoy as a submissive  - and for this I am more grateful than I can say.

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/16/2009 7:12:44 AM   
UKEvolutionary


Posts: 60
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
Some really interesting responses to the original post, thank you A/all.
Nothing "appears" to be conclusive as far as I can see, and it's interesting to see various opinions and supporting statements, I suppose My only "supporting" reply would be the usage of the submissive's "safe word" ( IF you use one ) The Dom/me is In charge of the scene / play / etc etc, but if the sub uses their safe word do you just ignore it because YOU'RE in charge ?? But then this too, opens up a whole new topic as two P/people who are in a M/s, D/s should have such an understanding and rapport with each other that the Dom/me should be able to "read" His / Her submissive as to not need a "safe word" !!


Maybe I have still got a lot to learn, but I am having the most wonderful journey with My girl physically, spiritually and emotionally and I would rather post questions like this to learn MORE than to not post them for "fear" of ridicule or "judgement" from others, which I'm pleased to say hasn't happened.

(in reply to katrinka)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/16/2009 7:29:04 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: daintydimples

A power exchange is only a paradox if you see it as a one way exchange. In a good dynamic, the power does not flow one way, it's circular. On some level, the s-type is empowered by giving up power.

1. a statement that seems self-contradictory but may be true: it's a strange paradox that a musician must practise improvising to become a good improviser   In much the same way, a submissive must yield power in order to have any power within a D/s dynamic.  If she refuses to yield her power, there is no D/s dynamic and she therefore has no power within the dynamic.  This is a paradox.2. a self-contradictory proposition, such as I always tell lies 3. a person or thing that is made up of contradictory elements [Greek paradoxos opposed to existing notions] As I noted in my first post, to the outside world, it appears as if the dominant holds all the power within this relationship/dynamic but within the dynamic, it is known by both parties that a submissive can stop a scene with one word or phrase, no matter how compelling the dominant is.  The submissive can alter the dynamic by refusing to yield on something upon which she has always yielded before.  Though it appears to the outside world that the dominant holds all the power to make choices, that power comes only from her willingness to yield to the dominant.  Of course, a D/s dynamic cannot exist without the yielding nor the willingness to accept that yielding.  So while the power is circular, there is equality within the inequality and inequality within the equality.  Again, a paradox.

(in reply to daintydimples)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/16/2009 11:13:22 AM   
lovingpet


Posts: 4270
Joined: 6/19/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: UKEvolutionary

Some really interesting responses to the original post, thank you A/all.
Nothing "appears" to be conclusive as far as I can see, and it's interesting to see various opinions and supporting statements, I suppose My only "supporting" reply would be the usage of the submissive's "safe word" ( IF you use one ) The Dom/me is In charge of the scene / play / etc etc, but if the sub uses their safe word do you just ignore it because YOU'RE in charge ?? But then this too, opens up a whole new topic as two P/people who are in a M/s, D/s should have such an understanding and rapport with each other that the Dom/me should be able to "read" His / Her submissive as to not need a "safe word" !!


Maybe I have still got a lot to learn, but I am having the most wonderful journey with My girl physically, spiritually and emotionally and I would rather post questions like this to learn MORE than to not post them for "fear" of ridicule or "judgement" from others, which I'm pleased to say hasn't happened.


Ahhhhh, but who gave the submissive that safeword? Honoring it is simply using a tool already provided for a specific purpose. It may end the scene, but that was the intent of it all along, so there is no control lost. It functioned exactly as it was meant to. Regardless of who pulls the trigger, did the gun still fire?

As for "reading" the submissive. Yes, some partners can and do. Not using safewords really doesn't have to do with such things though. Okay, it does somewhat, but it is simply because communication is such that a simple statement of the problem is possible. Also, it is a mental block for some submissives to have this back door escape (at least how it gets viewed anyway). It is mentally closing one more exit. What of the submissives who simply can't bring themselves to use the safeword they are offered? How does that affect this dichotomy of control you are envisioning?

lovingpet

(in reply to UKEvolutionary)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/16/2009 12:05:27 PM   
agirl


Posts: 4530
Joined: 6/14/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: UKEvolutionary

Some really interesting responses to the original post, thank you A/all.
Nothing "appears" to be conclusive as far as I can see, and it's interesting to see various opinions and supporting statements, I suppose My only "supporting" reply would be the usage of the submissive's "safe word" ( IF you use one ) The Dom/me is In charge of the scene / play / etc etc, but if the sub uses their safe word do you just ignore it because YOU'RE in charge ?? But then this too, opens up a whole new topic as two P/people who are in a M/s, D/s should have such an understanding and rapport with each other that the Dom/me should be able to "read" His / Her submissive as to not need a "safe word" !!


Maybe I have still got a lot to learn, but I am having the most wonderful journey with My girl physically, spiritually and emotionally and I would rather post questions like this to learn MORE than to not post them for "fear" of ridicule or "judgement" from others, which I'm pleased to say hasn't happened.


I don't happen to have a safeword but I have plenty of other words and we've been together a very long time.

If I had a safeword, I'd use it...... probably before the first strand of rope touched my wrist. It'd be a waste of time for us.....but that's US. People use them, they suit some people, they suit certain circumstances for some people.......if I was ever involved with anyone else in a physical sense without M being around , I'd not only have a safeword, I'd have a list of limits as long as my leg.

agirl

(in reply to UKEvolutionary)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/16/2009 1:16:30 PM   
shadowowl


Posts: 198
Joined: 5/31/2004
Status: offline
The Dom/me also has needs to do those things to the sub/slave or needs things from the relationship :)  so both fulfill each others needs Yin/Yang balance.
the exception is standard play not in a relationship in which case usually the sub is in charge of the situation but only in that they can stop things on command via safeword.
specially regarding pro's the subs are 90% in charge and the pro's provide the service so in theory most "pro-doms"  are much more sub then a lifestyle-doms and could be why more male "subs" like them since most of them are more like topping bottoms rather then subs :P
just my opinion though ;)


(in reply to agirl)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/16/2009 2:21:38 PM   
littlesarbonn


Posts: 1710
Joined: 12/3/2005
From: Stockton, California
Status: offline
People have a tendency to want to challenge the norms of belief (that the submissive submits and the dominant dominates) so we often hear the claim that a submissive is the dominant because he or she can walk away at any time. That really has nothing to do with dominance or submission because the dominant can walk away at any time as well. What it means is that both entities have the power that comes from coupling. Anyone can break the dynamic of a relationship, but that doesn't give them power; it gives them the ability to end the dynamic, meaning that once that "power" is used, there is not relationship, and thus the submissive really had no power but just the ability to take away the relationship.

During the relationship the dominant can be perceived as having all the power that he or she negotiates as part of the relationship dynamic to begin with. As long as the coupling remains, that dominant has all that power, and the submissive submits. If either one of them ends the relationship, that is not a reflection on the power dynamic. It's the end of the power dynamic.


_____________________________

<---- FYI, this picture looks JUST like me


http://www.littlesarbonn.com/Stickman/Stickman.htm
The Adventures of Stickman and the Unemployed Lego Spaceman

(in reply to UKEvolutionary)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/16/2009 7:52:09 PM   
shadowowl


Posts: 198
Joined: 5/31/2004
Status: offline
it may be the end of the power dynamic but there are a huge number of subs that set the rules and limits before it starts and all the D gets to do is manupulate the situation after the fact  (they can end it or do things within the subs described limits their choice).  and generally subs will end it if the D is not staying within their prescribed limits or doing things the way they want :P
   subs can also negotiate during a session as well to change things as they wish.  yes D's can walk away but D's don't set the limits they only work within the limits set by the sub.    
of course this is "subs"  not "slaves"  slaves are an entire different situation since they remove the limits and boundries of setting things themselves and truly turn over full power to a D to set the limits for them (perhaps with just a few hard limits for various safty or pyschology reasons).  much different power dynamic.  most are subs though so in general most s types are the ones with the most control in general play scenes with a random partner.  From my point of view ;)


(in reply to littlesarbonn)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/16/2009 8:19:56 PM   
flogger


Posts: 186
Joined: 6/27/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Biryl

The D/S aspect of BDSM is a bit of a paradox. 
The idea is that there is a dominant who is in charge and has the power (the degree of power depends upon the relationship).  The submissive or slave then lacks power. 
By all appearances, the dominant is in control and the submissive is not.
The truth of the matter is that the dominant has power only because the submissive yields it.  The submissive still truly retains all the power.  The power of the dominant is illusory, in a sense.  It can come to an end at any moment when the submissive/slave decides to reject the dominant's claim over them. 

Therein lies part of the appeal of dominance and submission (and what separates it from abusive or oppressive relationships).  The submissive/slave makes a choice, just as the dominant does.  The relationship being engaged in is a choice, constantly reaffirmed by the will of the participants involved.  Aileen (forgive me if using you as an example offends you) has no power to control her relationship because she, in fact, chose to give up that power.  She could choose to reclaim this power, which I imagine would end or harm her relationship with her dominant.  By choosing to submit, Aileen constantly affirms her dedication to her partner, her dominant.  He, in turn, affirms his dedication to her by continuing to assert power over her.  Unlike many traditional or vanilla relationships, d/s relationships involve constant affirmation through choice.

To continue this to your original commentary upon pleasure:  The dominant's purpose is to dominate.  The submissive's purpose is to submit.  It sounds like you want to pleasure your girl as best as possible because you care.  That tends to be what happens in caring, mutual relationships.  Even in d/s relationships, there can (and in my opinion, should) exist an equality amongst partners.  Both partners should be having their needs met.  Its just that these needs are being met in different ways.  The dominant meets their needs through dominance and exertion of power as the submissive has their needs met through submitting and relinquishing of power.  This is no way diminishes the power exchange or power relationship or even the "realness" of the power relations between the dominant and submissive.  Your choosing to fulfill your submissive's desires fulfills yours.  Therefore, you are meeting your own needs. 

Depending upon the structures of your relationship, you may engage in activities simply for the enjoyment of your submissive.  I would argue that this does not remove you from your role as a dominant.  Ultimately, you're still doing those activities for yourself.  You please your submissive because you gain pleasure from her enjoyment.  You are still in charge, and you still decide if you're going to please her, how you're going to please her, and other specifics of the situation.  She is still submitting to your will. 

Still, there is a bit of a paradoxical in D&S, but that's just how it is. 



This is a true action that has happened to me and my e-ex and it carrys a whole lot of reality supported by cause and effect.

(in reply to Biryl)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/16/2009 9:04:21 PM   
pompeii


Posts: 934
Joined: 1/4/2007
From: Silicon Valley, San Jose, California
Status: offline
Like any relationship ... quid pro quo ... 

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/17/2009 1:54:07 PM   
sweetcheeksbbw


Posts: 13
Joined: 9/9/2009
Status: offline
I have just recently had this dicussion with a slave.  The truth of it is that if the sub does not choose to give up his power to me, I am nothing.  In reality, the sub holds the cards.  It is my job as a good Domme to make him feel comfortable (or frightened enough - depending on how you look at it) to turn his power over to me.

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/17/2009 3:27:06 PM   
RavenMuse


Posts: 4030
Joined: 1/23/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sweetcheeksbbw
The truth of it is that if the sub does not choose to give up his power to me, I am nothing.  In reality, the sub holds the cards. 


Bollox! and no I don't apologise for being blunt. The Domme is 'nothing'?!? Turn that around, the sub is nothing if the Dominant chooses not to take up that submission.

Before submission there are two EQUAL people looking for compatibility, NEITHER is 'nothing'. It there is compatability then one submits the other takes up that submission, the relationship begins... if EITHER side chooses not to move forward there is no relationship, there is no Dynamic.


_____________________________

This above all: to thine own self be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man.

Owner of metalmiss

(in reply to sweetcheeksbbw)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Paradox ?? - 9/17/2009 4:08:12 PM   
windchymes


Posts: 9410
Joined: 4/18/2005
Status: offline
I like the yin & yang comparison the best.  If what each partner does naturally is what the other one "needs", isn't that the ideal?

_____________________________

You know it's going to be a GOOD blow job when she puts a Breathe Right strip on first.

Pick-up artists and garbage men should trade names.

(in reply to RavenMuse)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Paradox ?? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094