RE: Crotch Shots

RE: Crotch Shots (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

lusciouslips19 -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/19/2009 7:29:54 PM)
[sm=mop.gif]

lusciouslips19 -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/19/2009 7:34:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DemonKia Damn, that pic got taken down before I got to it . . . . . Sowwy, I have this habit of linking them to this thread.[&o]

DemonKia -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/19/2009 7:51:09 PM)
Ya notify them of their impending celebrity, is that what you're saying? While I applaud your sense of fairness, I deplore my lost opportunity for voyeurism . . . . . [8D]

lusciouslips19 -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/19/2009 8:35:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DemonKia Ya notify them of their impending celebrity, is that what you're saying? While I applaud your sense of fairness, I deplore my lost opportunity for voyeurism . . . . . [8D] Yes, but Im cleaning the streets![:D]

VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/19/2009 9:13:23 PM)
FAST REPLY: I only read a few of the first comments, but to everyone...there is a report photo button on the pictures.If you want a particular picture to be reviewed by the staff because you think it may be in violation etc., click that button.

VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/19/2009 9:16:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 See this is the things that aggravates me. i dont like going to my home page and getting smacked with the pole before I have had my coffee. I dont want the person to look at my profile and then be stuck on the page with his crotch on my page. Well at least you can delete it there. I wish CM had something to block the images you dont want on your page. It's called click the report photo button, then hide that user. You will never see them again! [;)] edited to add: and apparently someone found the report photo button which would be the probable reason that photo isnt available any more

marie2 -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/19/2009 9:31:09 PM)
It's a turn off to me to see the naked crotch of either sex in a profile photo. If I see a cock shot in a profile, this immediately rules the guy out...huge huge turn off for me. But to each his own of course, and I'm sure there are many people, both male and female, who enjoy seeing crotch pics.

GoddessImaginos -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/19/2009 9:33:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: marie2 It's a turn off to me to see the naked crotch of either sex in a profile photo. If I see a cock shot in a profile, this immediately rules the guy out...huge huge turn off for me. But to each his own of course, and I'm sure there are many people, both male and female, who enjoy seeing crotch pics. Ditto that. For Me, there's more to the equation, MUCH more, than what yer packin'. If I like the hypothetical you and decide I want to see what you've got, I'll ask, but no, please don't shove it in My face first thing or act like that's all you have to offer, because then you're just shallow and pathetic, and I'm not interested in that.

DemonKia -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/19/2009 10:48:53 PM)
lol While I like dick pics as pornography & novelty & for various & sundry other reasons, from the seeking-partnership mode I agree with the line of reasoning that those using a cock shot as a primary pic are probably a no-go . . . . . For me, cuz the message that having a penis as one's avatar indicates to me that that penis is the center of that person's world . . . . Or, at least, that's my knee-jerk initial impression. 'Ah, that's his whole world, right there . . . . '

Rhodes85 -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/19/2009 11:39:34 PM)
as a friend of mine says 'if I wanted to see an ass shot i'd look at a pic of george bush' [:D] 'So things have changed here at CM. What was not allowed is now allowed ' Well technically the rules say nothing 'obscene' and technically cock shots fall under that particular category. but its rarely enforced. Personally if I ran the site I wouldn't allow it simply because I wouldn't want to risk it booting out of my CDA protection, but thats me. Realistically I don't see how you can completely prevent it anyway

Acer49 -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/20/2009 2:35:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 So things have changed here at CM. What was not allowed is now allowed and occasionally it looks like Alt or somewhere else. I am a woman. I would never go out with or meet someone or have any interest in a man who got his dick splatterred on his profile page. Am I in the minority? I know some ladies like to look at those shots. The ones Iknow that do are already involved and I dont think they met their partners through a well placed crotch shot. So tell me, am I wrong to think that a man who thinks this will get a woman knows nothing about women? Men do you want to forge a relationship with a woman who has her labia spread wide for you to see in a profile? Am I old fashioned thinking this way? If all a woman has to offer is her genitals, I am going back to playing my video game

DemonKia -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/20/2009 10:30:33 AM)
Ummm, what she means is that before about 2 or 3 months ago all photos on CM went thru an approval process & there were no genitalia photos . . . . . Then they apparently eliminated that oversight, went to an auto-upload set-up, & are allowing all kinds of photos that would have gotten bounced previously. Having had lots of pics (none with genitalia, either, mostly BDSM kinda stuff) bounce under the previous way of doing things, I can testify to the change in policy . .. . . Anyways, Rhodes85, it didn't sound like you understood, so, FYI . . . . . . quote: ORIGINAL: Rhodes85 as a friend of mine says 'if I wanted to see an ass shot i'd look at a pic of george bush' [:D] 'So things have changed here at CM. What was not allowed is now allowed ' Well technically the rules say nothing 'obscene' and technically cock shots fall under that particular category. but its rarely enforced. Personally if I ran the site I wouldn't allow it simply because I wouldn't want to risk it booting out of my CDA protection, but thats me. Realistically I don't see how you can completely prevent it anyway

Rhodes85 -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/20/2009 7:21:09 PM)
No, I fully understand what you said. What i'm saying is, aside from that fact that not censoring shall we say 'questionable' pictures from being posted is a little odd, they are still liable for offensive/obscene pictures as well as copyright violations in pics that people post. The law specifically says they are, plus they are bound to enforce their own tos. I just find it odd that suddenly they would stop censoring pics to begin with. It makes me wonder just what exactly their admin staff does, because it doesn't seem to be anything else. Note that they still have the 'no explicit photos' warning posted on the upload page. In simple terms what I said about the CDA still applies, if anything they are risking any protection they had even more by doing it this way. Especially when cm freely admits to using peoples pictures for commercial uses that violate copyright laws, but i'm not getting into that here. My own opinion of why they stopped approving pics is because their lawyer told them they would be liable if anything happened to slip through that shouldn't. Not that I particularly care in this matter as I don't post those kinds of images in my profile. However, their current setup does have one very VERY dangerous side effect: a much greater risk of some idiotic perv posting 'questionable' pics of underage people (ie: kiddie porn) and the simple fact is the site is liable for that under federal law. It is their responsibility to ensure that does not happen. Combine this with the fact that their reporting system is useless and accounts can't even be reported properly and you're asking for trouble at some point. The fact is if it happens and someone reports it to their webhost the site would be removed by said webhost and reported to the cops. Again, doesn't effect me as its not my responsibility. But I wouldn't want to see any site shut down over something like that.

DemonKia -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/20/2009 8:11:30 PM)
My understanding of how the law works requires that CM do what they prudently can -- provide structures for tagging & removing legally obscene material (primarily the issue of concern is images of underage persons) & follow thru with those structures . . . . . In my experience they do police, particularly issues regarding under-age minors . . . . . I've reported & watched be removed profiles that featured inappropriate age-related materials . . . . . & I've heard from a coupla fems about being required to provide proof of their adult age as they look very young . . . . . . & the site's still here, I doubt that they've never had legally offensive materials uploaded in the 4+ years (6-ish?) they've been here. I believe they're simply required to remove the offending materials & report relevant details to the authorities, which I bet ya they do. Demonstration of reasonable attempts to meet the legal requirements goes a long way . . . . . & the content here is pretty tame. Have ya ever gone to, say, XTube or SlaveFarm? Yowzah, especially SF . .. . Makes CM (& FL) look practically PG-13 . . . . . It occurs to me that part of the reason why deleting spamsters & scamsters is de-prioritized on CM is because eliminating child porn is prioritized . . . . . & methinks they have a relatively small staff / limited work time available to 'do stuff' on either CM or CollarChat . .. . .

NihilusZero -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/20/2009 8:19:39 PM)
Could be nice. Could be not nice. shrug

AlchemicMelody -> RE: Crotch Shots (9/20/2009 8:38:35 PM)
I have never liked crotch shots. I certainly have no interest in males but I find that pussy shots are rather tasteless too. Now, artistic nudity is one thing. Crummy shots of genitals will never get my attention in a good way.

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 5 [6]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

6.054688E-02