SpinnerofTales
Posts: 1586
Joined: 5/30/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: slutslave4u Well of course he is, NOW......but as said and well known, he himself has represented the organization in the past, and continued as an "advisor" as has been said of years...... Do you think he would not call for an investigation now that so much has come out into the public eye for all to see just what a corrupt organization it really is? How could he not call for one? I mean really, he HAD no choice but to call for an investigation....what would that had said to the country had he not done so? It is no different than when he turned his back and began to distance himself from his church of, again, MANY (over 20) years....He knew what was being preached of in that church, but when the public caught on when he was running for the Office of The President Of The United States, he turned his back on it and "claimed" he had no knowledge nor idea, yet for over 20 some odd years he had a front row seat.....was a load of lies then, as is now....no difference! It is an old and tired political trick (unfortunately used by some on both sides of the aisle) that when a politician you don't like does something one disagrees with, shout about how they are doing wrong. When they do something you agree with, twist by claiming a) they should have done it earlier b) painting it in the worst possible light and c) claiming it was only the vigilance of your side of the argument that 'forced them to do it'. It's the "heads I win, tails you lose" school of political thought.
|