Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The evolution of "Sir"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: The evolution of "Sir" Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 9/30/2009 6:52:14 AM   
CelticPrince


Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:


Newbie




Posts: 73
Joined: 3/8/2007
Status: offline If slashyspeak floats your boat then go for it, it's your life & it's your standards, but it makes me nuts just reading it. If I had to write like that I'd go vanilla.....

In my experience , in both the online community and in what I would call real life / real time community there are those submissives who seem to view the addressing of all male D types as Sir asa lifestyle mandate and there are those male D types who expect ( or would like to expect) all S types to call them Sir from the get-go. Then there's S types who use it more informally, such as "night, Sir", "see you nect week , Sir", etc when one of us is leaving an event but most of the time they refer to me by my name. And there's those S types who reserve it only for someone they've grown to respect.When submissives email me, which isnt all that often, some will address me as Sir. A recent example - someone emailed me and said " Thank you for viewing my profile, Sir." I look at it asa formality on their part & I even welcome it but I don't view it as anything more than that. And I sure as hell don't expect it , nor do I question why another submissive who emails me didn't call me Sir. I'm a D type but I often refer to D types as Sir or Ma'am but only if I like and respect them, such as "hello / good night, Ma'am", or " Good to see you, Sir". I give it and take it simply - I repeat, simply -sometimes as courtesy or asa sign of respect but expect it from noone with whom I'm not ina relationship.With one exception - we rarely scene with anyone other than each other but if I am to be scening with someone I have 2 expectations - during the scene they focus as entirely on me and what I'm doing as possible, and they refer to me as Sir when speaking to me

Im my relationship it evolved. My pretty one now calls me Sir the vast majority of the time . She called me Sir when playing from the very first time we played, but for a couple months only when we played. For those first couple months we were seeing each other often but we didn't live together. An emphasis was placed on service and we were feeling each other out and didn't do any real serious negotiating re expectations, protocol, obedience, etc. Baby steps, then slightly bigger steps. When we did move things up a couple steps and began negotiating seriously it felt right to place the expectation that she call me Sir at certain times , those being Good morning Sir, Good night Sir, and at those times I gave her explicit direction( yes Sir, or, I need more details Sir). Over time she started calling me Sir more&more often,and eventually even thinking of me as Sir. Other than what I just mentioned I didn't place title expectations on her, I felt my expectation was enough to start and anything beyond that I'd earn by the way I acted, or not. I recollect noting it as something of a milestone when she started beginning emails or written notes with " Sir : ".

This is one of those things that there's no one, or even twenty "right" ways of doing it. What I just wrote is how it works for me, & how it worked for us......


buddingdom,

Thanks for your complete and valid view on the subject; slashyspeak is not in my view addreeses the qyuestion in only a remote degree and is not what I was addressing.

CP

(in reply to abuddingdom)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 9/30/2009 2:43:37 PM   
abuddingdom


Posts: 158
Joined: 3/8/2007
Status: offline
I get that, CP (& you're welcome, btw). I was just following and addressing one of the sideroads (slashspeak) that the thread took. I sometimes do that but generally I point out that I'm doing it. My main intent was  to respond to your original topic.......

(in reply to CelticPrince)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 9/30/2009 5:16:18 PM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
G'day CP, great question.

My take on things is probably well known, however I'll restate it in response to your question.

I use "Sir" as a normal form or address when addressing someone who I am not familiar enough to use their given name in either the spoken or written format. Certainly I will do this in a formal arena as well as in the more socially casual one. In specific situations like addressing a military officer of higher rank than the one I retired with (colonel) I automatically use Sir. I do this also when addressing any male member of Royalty personally rather than using the lengthy of listing their titles and other honorifics (They do the same to me for the same reason too). I use Sir also with people I have a great deal of respect for. I use lower case in communications when mentioning people generally but use upper case when dealing with or addressing someone specifically.  (Noun rather than pronoun). Much of this is the way i was briought up to and trained to use in that manner. (Frankly fuck the modern grammatical short cuts I stay with the olde worlde usage which is so much more romantic and gracious. Grammar Nazis can be trucked of to the Grammatical/Spelling Auschwitz for reality adjustment or extermination).  I usually have a precursor in that I am ok for someone referring to me as Sir/sir as long as they spell it SIR and not CUR. My usage does not change in and out of kink, lifestyles or chat rooms it is a constant. I do use at the appropriate times another variation mostly seen in literature from the British Empire period (Victorian/Edwardian) which is "Sirrah": Mister; fellow. Used as a contemptuous form of address. 


_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/1/2009 3:24:13 AM   
CelticPrince


Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

For a sub to call their dom "Sir" is fine. That's part of the dynamic.

Anybody who refers to themself as "Sir" or "Master" is a pretentious asshat.


roughleather,

asshat? Methinks you might want to rewtite Chapter 1 in the Dominant Handbook to reflect that caution.

CP

(in reply to roughleather)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/1/2009 3:27:03 AM   
CelticPrince


Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

I do not think chat rooms are a good representation of anything other than bad grammar and poor manners.

_____________________________


Vendaval,

Well I cannot disagree but it meets the needs of the folks that go there; now how about the original post?

CP

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/1/2009 3:37:24 AM   
Loxosceles


Posts: 46
Joined: 10/7/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: roughleather
For a sub to call their dom "Sir" is fine. That's part of the dynamic.
Anybody who refers to themself as "Sir" or "Master" is a pretentious asshat. 


As are the people who point it out, and use the word "themself"

(in reply to roughleather)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/1/2009 6:12:46 AM   
marie2


Posts: 1690
Joined: 11/4/2008
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CelticPrince

Be yee new to the path, Dominant of submissive; what is your application!

CP


I'm not new to the path, I'm about 10 yrs into it now, and when I first found the path, it was in a chatroom and all the submissives were using the term sir to address the dominants, even the ones that they didn't particularly respect.  This never made much sense to me, so it's not something that I ever adopted, but I suppose I can understand that some people in this "sub-culture" we call bdsm or the "lifestyle"  feel comfortable with that. 

When I first meet or talk to a potential dominant, I prefer to use his first name, but as things develope and I begin to feel submissive to him, I prefer to use sir.  For me there comes a time in the evolution where using his first name just begins to feel wrong, or I should say it begins to feel uncomfortable.  I don't know why, I can't explain it, but it feels natural for me to use sir, so I do it.  I've also never been personally involved with a dominant who didn't like it or who took exception to it.  On very rare occasion, I'll use the term sir with someone who isn't my dominant, but someone that I admire greatly and respect.  Feels right and comfortable for me.

I can understand how some people find it weird though, because that's the way I feel about the term "master".  That just makes me feel like I'm playing, but that's only because of my own association with that word. This is not to say that those who prefer "master" are playing at their relationship dynamic. 

We all have different terms that we like to use with each other for whatever reasons that make us feel the way we need to feel when we interact with our partners, non-bdsmers do it too, whether it be a cutesy little nickname or grandpoobahmaster.  To each his own.

(in reply to CelticPrince)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/1/2009 8:12:38 AM   
Andalusite


Posts: 2492
Joined: 1/25/2009
Status: offline
I use Master as more of a formal title, not necessarily role play, but I agree that Sir just seems to feel right/natural, especially when I am feeling particularly submissive. I do use his first name if we're in a vanilla situation.

(in reply to marie2)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/1/2009 11:57:42 AM   
CelticPrince


Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

CP, I've been doing D/s and BDSM for 15 years, but didn't get into the online thing until about 5 or 6 years ago. Once I did, I used forums, but mostly not chat rooms. So, I never got much into the honorifics, weird capitalisation, or s/Slashy S/speak. I think those conventions are rather silly or outright annoying. I use Sir when addressing my Master frequently, and did so with my previous dominant as well. Otherwise, I just use "sir" in the generic "hey whatsyerface" way toward male strangers, or at Renaissance Faires when addressing someone who is playing a Knight. I also use it if it is actually part of someone's name, but it's just their nickname/screen-name, and doesn't hold any respectful connotation, anymore than "Worthless" or "slut" means that I actually feel dominating or humiliating toward people who include those terms in their name.


Andalusite,

I am not so sure that back then the use of "sir" was an "honorific" as folks like to say but rather just a recognition that it was a means of addressing a dominant casually.

CP

(in reply to Andalusite)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/2/2009 1:05:35 PM   
CelticPrince


Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Um, why not just use the proper English usage?


Arpig,

And that would be..........?

CP

(in reply to Arpig)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/2/2009 3:57:43 PM   
gypsygrl


Posts: 1471
Joined: 10/8/2005
From: new york state
Status: offline
Sir's already posted on this, but I'll add my bit. (see abuddingdom's post)

Sir's really the only one I call Sir.  If I called every male dominant Sir, what would I call my Sir?  Its how I think of him, and I call him that pretty much all the time.  Sometimes, its simply inappropriate and I have to think a minute before I can remember his first name.  Everyone is pretty much used to me calling him Sir so its not an issue most the time.

It was a milestone of sorts when I began to think of him as Sir instead of a dominant friend or something like that.  Its kind of like when I started thinking of him as my dominant, rather than someone I rp'd D/s with, or an internalization of his authority over me.


_____________________________

“To be happy is to be able to become aware of oneself without fright.” ~Walter Benjamin


(in reply to CelticPrince)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/2/2009 4:20:52 PM   
stardancer00


Posts: 60
Joined: 7/6/2005
Status: offline
What gypsygrl said makes sense  to me,  too.  When  i had my first D/s relationships,  it was before the internet,and we did not use titles.  i was never  involved in the organized social scene,  so  i don't know what went on there.  After the internet, it seemed there were many who needed to be called one title or another.  i feel that  needing to be called this or that is more about ego-puffing or convincing oneself of one's importance, but when it happens in a natural manner  between a sub/slave and her Sir, it becomes an expression  of something deeper than just roles.

(in reply to gypsygrl)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/2/2009 10:44:22 PM   
HeavansKeeper


Posts: 1254
Joined: 5/14/2007
Status: offline
I feel there is no power ladder until one is whimmed into existence. I will frequently refer to a female submissive as "Miss [name]". Being a Trekkie, I can't call a person "Mister [name]" Without thinking of Captain Picard saying "Mister Data". Hence, boytoys get called by their first name.

"Sir" is treated exactly as it would be in English. It denotes a certain amount of respect, but has become polluted down to what the guy at Dunkin' Donuts calls me. I'm pretty sure I'd not his master.

In short, sir means very little to me. Once denoting knighthood, the phrase now represents any male with which business is conducted.

_____________________________

The Loving Owner of HisHeavan

... You've waited your whole life for this moment...

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/4/2009 7:33:49 AM   
CelticPrince


Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

I get that, CP (& you're welcome, btw). I was just following and addressing one of the sideroads (slashspeak) that the thread took. I sometimes do that but generally I point out that I'm doing it. My main intent was to respond to your original topic.......


abuddingdom,

And indeed you did that very well. Welcome to the boards and hope to see more partisipation from you here.

CP

(in reply to abuddingdom)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/4/2009 7:51:26 AM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
One thing I will mention is that for us, in the beginning when it was primarily a play relationship, I did use Sir. But unlike abuddingdom, for us it has evolved the other way. We've pretty much dropped the demand for honorifics except in the occasional play scene, and even then rarely. He knows who he is to me and where he is in my heart, and that's more important than a formal title.

I don't say Sir would you like some more tea, I use Honey. And that works better for us.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to CelticPrince)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/4/2009 2:50:20 PM   
CelticPrince


Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

G'day CP, great question.

My take on things is probably well known, however I'll restate it in response to your question.

I use "Sir" as a normal form or address when addressing someone who I am not familiar enough to use their given name in either the spoken or written format. Certainly I will do this in a formal arena as well as in the more socially casual one. In specific situations like addressing a military officer of higher rank than the one I retired with (colonel) I automatically use Sir. I do this also when addressing any male member of Royalty personally rather than using the lengthy of listing their titles and other honorifics (They do the same to me for the same reason too). I use Sir also with people I have a great deal of respect for. I use lower case in communications when mentioning people generally but use upper case when dealing with or addressing someone specifically. (Noun rather than pronoun). Much of this is the way i was briought up to and trained to use in that manner. (Frankly fuck the modern grammatical short cuts I stay with the olde worlde usage which is so much more romantic and gracious. Grammar Nazis can be trucked of to the Grammatical/Spelling Auschwitz for reality adjustment or extermination). I usually have a precursor in that I am ok for someone referring to me as Sir/sir as long as they spell it SIR and not CUR. My usage does not change in and out of kink, lifestyles or chat rooms it is a constant. I do use at the appropriate times another variation mostly seen in literature from the British Empire period (Victorian/Edwardian) which is "Sirrah": Mister; fellow. Used as a contemptuous form of address.


IronBear,

Always good to hear from you IB and I pretty much am in accord with you on your useage; but what do you require or ask from the submissive side of the slash?

CP

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/4/2009 4:13:32 PM   
CollaredChicklet


Posts: 146
Joined: 10/28/2008
Status: offline
my take is that "Sir" or "Master" is an address of respect. Obviously, someone who i call "Master" has earned that respect, or i wouldn't have taken His collar. Even in a normal, vanilla situation, i will happily call someone "Sir" at my workplace or elsewhere as long as there is politeness and some form of "respect" involved. obviously, someone coming in work sceaming and yelling about something that we apparently did wrong will not get the same respect from me.

And if my Master trusts someone, then i will trust my Master, and give that person my respect in return.
just my take...

_____________________________



"The sea was calm, your heart would have responded gaily, when invited, beating obediently to controlling hands" --T.S. Eliot, The Waste Land

(in reply to CelticPrince)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/8/2009 5:51:20 AM   
CelticPrince


Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

I'm not new to the path, I'm about 10 yrs into it now, and when I first found the path, it was in a chatroom and all the submissives were using the term sir to address the dominants, even the ones that they didn't particularly respect. This never made much sense to me, so it's not something that I ever adopted, but I suppose I can understand that some people in this "sub-culture" we call bdsm or the "lifestyle" feel comfortable with that.

When I first meet or talk to a potential dominant, I prefer to use his first name, but as things develope and I begin to feel submissive to him, I prefer to use sir. For me there comes a time in the evolution where using his first name just begins to feel wrong, or I should say it begins to feel uncomfortable. I don't know why, I can't explain it, but it feels natural for me to use sir, so I do it. I've also never been personally involved with a dominant who didn't like it or who took exception to it. On very rare occasion, I'll use the term sir with someone who isn't my dominant, but someone that I admire greatly and respect. Feels right and comfortable for me.

I can understand how some people find it weird though, because that's the way I feel about the term "master". That just makes me feel like I'm playing, but that's only because of my own association with that word. This is not to say that those who prefer "master" are playing at their relationship dynamic.

We all have different terms that we like to use with each other for whatever reasons that make us feel the way we need to feel when we interact with our partners, non-bdsmers do it too, whether it be a cutesy little nickname or grandpoobahmaster. To each his own.



marie,

I think your ending comment says it all as to the evolution of it useage "to each his own"
Thanks for your thoughts.

CP

(in reply to marie2)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/8/2009 6:23:39 AM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CelticPrince

quote:

G'day CP, great question.

My take on things is probably well known, however I'll restate it in response to your question.

I use "Sir" as a normal form or address when addressing someone who I am not familiar enough to use their given name in either the spoken or written format. Certainly I will do this in a formal arena as well as in the more socially casual one. In specific situations like addressing a military officer of higher rank than the one I retired with (colonel) I automatically use Sir. I do this also when addressing any male member of Royalty personally rather than using the lengthy of listing their titles and other honorifics (They do the same to me for the same reason too). I use Sir also with people I have a great deal of respect for. I use lower case in communications when mentioning people generally but use upper case when dealing with or addressing someone specifically. (Noun rather than pronoun). Much of this is the way i was briought up to and trained to use in that manner. (Frankly fuck the modern grammatical short cuts I stay with the olde worlde usage which is so much more romantic and gracious. Grammar Nazis can be trucked of to the Grammatical/Spelling Auschwitz for reality adjustment or extermination). I usually have a precursor in that I am ok for someone referring to me as Sir/sir as long as they spell it SIR and not CUR. My usage does not change in and out of kink, lifestyles or chat rooms it is a constant. I do use at the appropriate times another variation mostly seen in literature from the British Empire period (Victorian/Edwardian) which is "Sirrah": Mister; fellow. Used as a contemptuous form of address.


IronBear,

Always good to hear from you IB and I pretty much am in accord with you on your useage; but what do you require or ask from the submissive side of the slash?

CP


Politeness my friend, politeness and good manners little more. I certainly do not have the right to expect anything more from those on, as you put it, the submissive side of the slash who are not in my personal collar or the Bruin Cottage collar. I'm just another dominant bloke. I mostly get called IB or Bear with or without the Sir and I am happy with that. In private at home or in public I am also happy with IB or Bear from those of the House or my Personal Collar, however on formal occasions Master is acceptable  as is Sir. It more in line with the traditions of  and correct for the Victorian period than anything else.


_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to CelticPrince)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: The evolution of "Sir" - 10/11/2009 2:53:04 AM   
CelticPrince


Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:


Wicked




Posts: 1464
Joined: 10/8/2005
From: new york state
Status: offline Sir's already posted on this, but I'll add my bit. (see abuddingdom's post)

Sir's really the only one I call Sir. If I called every male dominant Sir, what would I call my Sir? Its how I think of him, and I call him that pretty much all the time. Sometimes, its simply inappropriate and I have to think a minute before I can remember his first name. Everyone is pretty much used to me calling him Sir so its not an issue most the time.

It was a milestone of sorts when I began to think of him as Sir instead of a dominant friend or something like that. Its kind of like when I started thinking of him as my dominant, rather than someone I rp'd D/s with, or an internalization of his authority over me.


gypsygrl,

It is indeed interesting how applying the use of sir creeps into your mind with the right person.
Thanks for adding to your Sirs input.

CP



(in reply to gypsygrl)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: The evolution of "Sir" Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141