DemonKia
Posts: 5521
Joined: 10/13/2007 From: Chico, Nor-Cali Status: offline
|
lol & FR, after read thru Seriously, this is a fucking hysterically funny thread . . .. . . & wow, it wedged loose a torrent of stuff from me, lol . . . . . . . A more general thought triggered by this thread is the idea that there are many kinds of 'smarts': social, emotional, physical, creative, mystical, political, money, book smarts (which breaks into various categories -- literature, math, etc -- & is the kind I tend to have some mastery over), & so on & so forth . . . & while there can be some correlation between them, it's generally pretty rough correlation & not necessarily to be found from one individual set of randomness to the next . . . . . . I know from hard personal experience that while I can be brilliant in that book smart way, I can be remarkably retarded when it comes to the social & emotional realms . . . . . I'm gonna climb out of one closet, here, briefly, & admit that I'm really smart, mostly (as stated above) of the 'book' variety. (I try to cultivate some kinda humility so I'm rarely willing to directly cop to that, especially in public, but it seems relevant to the topic at hand . . . . . ) &, oh horror-of-horrors, I'm an 'intellectual' . . . . . & a science geek . . . . .. . & a bit of a trivia buff . . . . . . & the finest compliment ever handed to me was that I could 'talk to nearly anyone about nearly anything' . . .. . . & in my experience, I'm in a teeny-tiny percentile all by myself . . . . . There are people who's focused, in-depth knowledge is greater than mine, but when it comes to breadth I'm in a class all my own . . . . . (& if you think I'm 'bragging' you've no clue how lonely it can be to be in a league all one's own . . . . . ) Given that, I don't give much of a fudge for whether those around me meet up to some yardstick of expectations about their intellects . . . . . There are much more important characteristics than sheer intelligence -- loyalty, kindness, compassion, reliability, desire, kinkiness, libido, honesty, & handfuls of other personality factors weigh so much more heavily .. . . . . . For me, it's more a matter of there needs to be some base level of smarts to succeed in interacting with me, a you-must-be-this-smart-to-ride rule, but anything beyond that modicum of brains is gravy, for me . . . . . . . lol In my experience, people who are 'as smart as me' are like me in other ways, too -- arrogant-unto-pretentiousness, condescending, annoying know-it-alls, snobby, etc, etc, etc -- & I'm plenty of all that, so why seek out more of the same . . . . . I prefer to seek out the company of those who 'balance' me, who are maybe humble to-a-fault . . . . . & I especially prize some naivete, some 'child mind' in myself & others. Knowing can get in the way of learning, & I make some attempt to cultivate my 'empty teacup nature' . . . . . . Another thought is that we Americans (y'all other planetary nationals can join in at will, I just know best what I live in) have a very uneasy relationship with 'meritocracy', that those who are more skilled, talented, et al, deserve bigger rewards, preferential access, & such like due to their greater demonstrated merit. It clashes with what I suspect are more deeply held values around egalitarianism . . . . . . Oh. & last, but not least, big fuckin' raspberry over the stupidity of evaluating personalities via grammar & spelling . . . . . Yeah, there may be some correlation to other stuff, & it may be primally important to others, but not to me . . .. . & huge LOLOLOLOL over how, time & again, the 'linguistic Nazi-types' mis-spell & otherwise blow their grammatical superiority all over the place in their posts slamming the naughty typo-ists & brain-oh-ists . . . . Edit: [removal of errant comma]
< Message edited by DemonKia -- 9/28/2009 2:56:40 PM >
_____________________________
Snarko ergo sum. The Verbossinator
|