RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Moonhead -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/1/2009 12:51:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

Michael More and Rush Limbaugh are actualy the same person. His real name is Bob Schmeel. He is a janitor from Poughkeepsie who suffers from Multiple Personality Disorder (he is also Barbara Streisand).

They both have bigger tits than Streisand, though.




kdsub -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/1/2009 1:49:51 PM)

yep that was me...and you were gorgeous…thank you




Moonhead -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/1/2009 1:56:07 PM)

That was a penis and you weren't taking a shit?




Hillwilliam -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/1/2009 2:09:07 PM)

Holy CRAP, this is a fun thread I started.  I gotta get My evil little mind workiin on another one for monday.




Sanity -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/1/2009 2:09:09 PM)

I don't think too many Conservatives concern themselves with Michael Moore. He couldn't do Conservatives any more favors if he were working for us.

Sometimes I have to wonder if he is...


quote:

ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales

Actually, what we love is when he makes that vein in a conservative's forehead throb. That's worth the price of a movie ticket to keep him working alone.






Moonhead -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/1/2009 2:13:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

I don't think too many Conservatives concern themselves with Michael Moore. He couldn't do Conservatives any more favors if he were working for us.

Sometimes I have to wonder if he is...


quote:

ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales

Actually, what we love is when he makes that vein in a conservative's forehead throb. That's worth the price of a movie ticket to keep him working alone.




I've wondered that myself, frankly. I don't think it's possible that he could be quite that stupid, so it has to be a put on, doesn't it?




kdsub -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/1/2009 4:58:53 PM)

Don’t be jealous get your own pickup.




Sanity -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/1/2009 5:00:24 PM)

Fast Reply -
quote:



White House lashes out at Fox News for 'lies'


In the past few months, Fox News' critical coverage of the Obama administration has been the subject of scornful scrutiny by left-leaning pundits and political satirists. But now the White House appears to be willing to get dirt on its own hands, jumping into the fray by blasting the network's "disregard for facts" in a post on the official White House blog.

***

Lee specifically takes issue with Glenn Beck, who in July accused the president of being a "racist" with "a deep-seated hatred for white people or white culture," for showing that "nothing is worthy of respect if it can be used as part of a partisan attack to boost ratings." Lee then goes on to "reality check" a number of assertions recently made by Beck on his afternoon program, in addition to directing readers to the St. Petersburg Times' Politifact site, which rebuts accusations made by Fox News' Steve Doocy against Patrick Gaspard, the director of the White House Office of Political Affairs.


***

While many are raising hay about the White House acting aggressively to combat perceived smears from Fox News, it isn't unprecedented for a president and his administration to feud openly with the media. George W. Bush and CBS came to blows in 2004 after Dan Rather alleged on 60 Minutes II that Bush had used his family's connections to manipulate his enlistment in the National Guard to avoid serving in combat in Vietnam, an incident that led to the firing of CBS producer Mary Mapes and badly tarnished Rather's reputation as an objective newsman. Prior to that, Hillary Clinton famously alleged that forces in the media were involved in a "vast right-wing conspiracy" to destroy her husband's presidency, while Nixon's infamous enemies list contained numerous names of media members and the news organizations they worked for. In short, animosity existing between the White House and the media isn't anything new.


Full article here




kdsub -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/1/2009 5:02:23 PM)

Michael Moore is another example of political trash media...I'd love to see Limbaugh the mouth against Moore the whore in a UFC cage fight.

Butch




SpinnerofTales -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/1/2009 5:10:17 PM)

quote:

Michael Moore is another example of political trash media...I'd love to see Limbaugh the mouth against Moore the whore in a UFC cage fight.
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub


Butch



I'm not much on the cage fight angle, but they'd make a pisspot full of money if they went on a debate tour. I'd buy a ticket.




kdsub -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/1/2009 5:14:59 PM)

I don't think either one have anything to say I want to hear...anyway they are both experts at talking around reality. It would be like a Presidential debate...useless. I would rather watch reruns of " Married With Children"

Butch




HatesParisHilton -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/1/2009 9:35:15 PM)

"I don't think too many Conservatives concern themselves with Michael Moore. He couldn't do Conservatives any more favors if he were working for us. "

which is why millions of us "Frat Boys Must Die" folks won't even watch his shtick on free to air, much less dvd rental prices as cheap as they are, or worse, CINEMA TICKET PRICES.

irony #1:  health promotion/anti-fattening and artery clogging lifestyle ads rolling before a MICHAEL FUCKING MOORE movie!

what the FUCK?  man, if the cineplexes were CONSISTANT, the ads would be for Velveeta, Arby's, Pudding Pops and Marie Calendar's Cholcolate Silk Pies.

say what you want, but at least as HOORIBLE as Rush sounds and looks, he has SANITY as a poster boy for him , and at least SANITY looks like he might survive trotting at 3 kms per hour for 30 metres to catch a fucking BUS.

I mean, Rushbutt revolts, but MikeMooreMangoSwampAss?

Dude.

I mean, DUDE.

I'd rather lick Coulter's "little voodoo doll of a microscopic nazi dick" clit than suffer one nanosecond of MooreSwampAss.




tazzygirl -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/1/2009 9:45:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

yep that was me...and you were gorgeous…thank you


awww.. glad you enjoyed the show!!![:)] [;)]




SeekingAZ -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/2/2009 12:58:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: elegantcdgoddess


quote:

ORIGINAL: tiedtothebed

trying to override the bill of rights and take away the right to bear arms (Hitler's first act in Germany after he took power) will leave the citizenry merciless at the hand of the government.



It is sad sad country if our main weapon against government is .45. I was told our weapon is our right to vote, to choose democratic government, and to dispose of it if we dont like it.

Do you honestly believe you have constitutional right to bear arms to protect yourself against government? Like Waco, TX, or Oklahoma, OH, which recent case would you like to quote.


Yes I do, just like Washington, Jefferson, Adams and all the other founding fathers had the god-given right to send the English back across the pond. And in doing so they bled and suffered to give you the first government in human history that enumerated your god-given right to defend yourself effectively. A right way too many people are willing to throw in the garbage in return so they can vote for a government that is willing to (illegally) put a gun to other's people heads and make them pay for *YOUR* healthcare which is no one's responsibility but your own or to force people to follow your own fundamentalist environmental views. It's clear that a near majority of people in this country don't realize the government guns being used for your "benefit" today can be used to blow your own brains out tomorrow.

And what the hell do you think the word "dispose" meant in the declaration of independence ? That the founding fathers had a right to vote the English out but didn't have a right to defend themselves when the redcoats began killing them ? Any republican form of government that is still following the people's will has no need to be "disposed". "Dispose" has nothing to do with elections.

I used to wonder during high school/college western history classes how a society could get so screwed up that it can vote a Hitler into power and not only stand by but cheer on when the genocidal slaughter of the chosen scapegoat class begins. Now I wonder how I can possibly prevent having to experience something similar in my lifetime. If friggen amazes me what people are willing to give up in order to make other people pay for their own personal responsibilities. Or in other words, if you don't have health insurance why the hell are you even able to post here ? Certainly health insurance is a more important responsibility than Internet connectivity (or cell phone, cable, or car payment, ad infinitum).

I wasn't really worried until I woke up one night last month and instantly realized I no longer had any fear of death (still have plenty of fear of pain, well, the wrong kind of pain anyway). Since that change wasn't the result of a month long fast or a 48 hour meditation session and since I don't engage in pharmacological recreation I have to assume I'm being prepared for something potentially ugly. The most benign possibility I can think of is my time is short and that i'm due to cross in some stupidly useless way (ie car accident, heart attack, etc). It's nauseatingly weird to have that potential kind of event to now be listed in the "not so bad, I can deal with it" category.





kittinSol -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/2/2009 4:36:15 AM)

Oh dear [&:] ...




HatesParisHilton -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/2/2009 4:45:38 AM)

no no no, you have to roll with it and NOT give in to reason or impartiality.  If you won't let ME do it YOU can't either!   [:-]

now get back in there, kiddo, it's only round 5, and the crowd loves you best!

(plays Rocky theme for Kittensol, hands her a live hamster)




kittinSol -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/2/2009 4:50:08 AM)

Did you know that Obama was like Hitler? And did you know that Americans have the right to shoot at their government? It's in the Constitution, ya know. So, to prevent Obama from doing a Hitler, and before he takes away your guns, what do you have to do [8|] ?

Edited, coz my syntax is positively FROG this morning [8D] .




Lucylastic -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/2/2009 4:58:48 AM)

This isnt going to end well is it
Lucy




kittinSol -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/2/2009 5:04:56 AM)

Last night, I watched the news on some obscure channel with a low number - it was WICKED cool. No commercials, or hardly any at all. They explored each issue at length. They had nobody famous on the set, but each person being interviewed was knowledgeable. No pundits, no music, no flashy titles. The program obviously took its viewers seriously.

There was no mention of any kind of hype. I think it was Public Broadcasting (I can't tell for sure, as I'm not a telly addict), but it made me wonder why I always hear about CNN/MSNBC and Fox, and never about Public Broadcasting.

Any idea :-)?




HatesParisHilton -> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. (10/2/2009 5:06:14 AM)

laughing

too

hard

to

type....




Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875